James R Dornhoffer, John P Marinelli, Christine M Lohse, Justin Cottrell, Sean O McMenomey, J Thomas Roland, Nicholas J Thompson, Kevin D Brown, Jacob C Lucas, Seilesh C Babu, Nathan R Lindquist, Elizabeth L Perkins, Torsten Rahne, Stefan K Plontke, Donald Tan, Jacob B Hunter, Erin Harvey, Nicholas L Deep, Samantha Y Cerasiello, Matthew L Kircher, Mana Espahbodi, Evan L Tooker, Simon K W Lloyd, Matthew L Carlson
{"title":"比较 100 例散发性前庭许旺瘤患者通过观察、放射外科手术或显微外科手术治疗后的人工耳蜗植入效果:多机构回顾","authors":"James R Dornhoffer, John P Marinelli, Christine M Lohse, Justin Cottrell, Sean O McMenomey, J Thomas Roland, Nicholas J Thompson, Kevin D Brown, Jacob C Lucas, Seilesh C Babu, Nathan R Lindquist, Elizabeth L Perkins, Torsten Rahne, Stefan K Plontke, Donald Tan, Jacob B Hunter, Erin Harvey, Nicholas L Deep, Samantha Y Cerasiello, Matthew L Kircher, Mana Espahbodi, Evan L Tooker, Simon K W Lloyd, Matthew L Carlson","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed with observation, radiosurgery, or microsurgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eleven tertiary academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred patients with sporadic VS who received an ipsilateral CI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ipsilateral cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pure-tone thresholds, monosyllabic speech perception testing scores, and rates of open-set speech acquisition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients studied, 54 underwent microsurgery, 26 underwent radiosurgery, 19 continued observation, and 1 underwent multimodal therapy. Among all patients, the median post-implantation pure-tone average was 31 dB (interquartile range [IQR] 25-39 dB) and the median monosyllabic speech perception score was 30% (IQR 0-60%) at a median of 12 months (IQR 5-25 months) post-implantation. Patients who were managed with microsurgery (median speech perception score 11%, IQR 0-52%) exhibited poorer implant outcomes overall compared with those managed with observation (median speech perception score 52%, IQR 40-72%) or radiosurgery (median speech perception score 30%, IQR 16-60%). Open-set speech perception was achieved in 61% of patients managed with microsurgery, 100% with observation, and 80% with radiosurgery. In a multivariable setting, those managed with observation (p = 0.02) or who underwent radiosurgery (p = 0.04) were significantly more likely to achieve open-set speech perception compared with patients who underwent microsurgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cochlear implants offer benefit in selected patients with sporadic VS. Although achieved in over half of people after microsurgery, open-set speech perception is more reliably attained in patients who are treated with observation or radiosurgery compared with microsurgical resection. These data may inform patient counseling and VS tumor management in people who may benefit from implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"45 10","pages":"e719-e726"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Cochlear Implant Outcomes in 100 Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Managed With Observation, Radiosurgery, or Microsurgery: A Multi-Institutional Review.\",\"authors\":\"James R Dornhoffer, John P Marinelli, Christine M Lohse, Justin Cottrell, Sean O McMenomey, J Thomas Roland, Nicholas J Thompson, Kevin D Brown, Jacob C Lucas, Seilesh C Babu, Nathan R Lindquist, Elizabeth L Perkins, Torsten Rahne, Stefan K Plontke, Donald Tan, Jacob B Hunter, Erin Harvey, Nicholas L Deep, Samantha Y Cerasiello, Matthew L Kircher, Mana Espahbodi, Evan L Tooker, Simon K W Lloyd, Matthew L Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed with observation, radiosurgery, or microsurgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eleven tertiary academic medical centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred patients with sporadic VS who received an ipsilateral CI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ipsilateral cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pure-tone thresholds, monosyllabic speech perception testing scores, and rates of open-set speech acquisition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients studied, 54 underwent microsurgery, 26 underwent radiosurgery, 19 continued observation, and 1 underwent multimodal therapy. Among all patients, the median post-implantation pure-tone average was 31 dB (interquartile range [IQR] 25-39 dB) and the median monosyllabic speech perception score was 30% (IQR 0-60%) at a median of 12 months (IQR 5-25 months) post-implantation. Patients who were managed with microsurgery (median speech perception score 11%, IQR 0-52%) exhibited poorer implant outcomes overall compared with those managed with observation (median speech perception score 52%, IQR 40-72%) or radiosurgery (median speech perception score 30%, IQR 16-60%). Open-set speech perception was achieved in 61% of patients managed with microsurgery, 100% with observation, and 80% with radiosurgery. In a multivariable setting, those managed with observation (p = 0.02) or who underwent radiosurgery (p = 0.04) were significantly more likely to achieve open-set speech perception compared with patients who underwent microsurgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cochlear implants offer benefit in selected patients with sporadic VS. Although achieved in over half of people after microsurgery, open-set speech perception is more reliably attained in patients who are treated with observation or radiosurgery compared with microsurgical resection. These data may inform patient counseling and VS tumor management in people who may benefit from implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\"45 10\",\"pages\":\"e719-e726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004298\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing Cochlear Implant Outcomes in 100 Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Managed With Observation, Radiosurgery, or Microsurgery: A Multi-Institutional Review.
Objective: To compare cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed with observation, radiosurgery, or microsurgery.
Study design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Eleven tertiary academic medical centers.
Patients: One hundred patients with sporadic VS who received an ipsilateral CI.
Interventions: Ipsilateral cochlear implantation.
Main outcome measures: Pure-tone thresholds, monosyllabic speech perception testing scores, and rates of open-set speech acquisition.
Results: Of the 100 patients studied, 54 underwent microsurgery, 26 underwent radiosurgery, 19 continued observation, and 1 underwent multimodal therapy. Among all patients, the median post-implantation pure-tone average was 31 dB (interquartile range [IQR] 25-39 dB) and the median monosyllabic speech perception score was 30% (IQR 0-60%) at a median of 12 months (IQR 5-25 months) post-implantation. Patients who were managed with microsurgery (median speech perception score 11%, IQR 0-52%) exhibited poorer implant outcomes overall compared with those managed with observation (median speech perception score 52%, IQR 40-72%) or radiosurgery (median speech perception score 30%, IQR 16-60%). Open-set speech perception was achieved in 61% of patients managed with microsurgery, 100% with observation, and 80% with radiosurgery. In a multivariable setting, those managed with observation (p = 0.02) or who underwent radiosurgery (p = 0.04) were significantly more likely to achieve open-set speech perception compared with patients who underwent microsurgery.
Conclusions: Cochlear implants offer benefit in selected patients with sporadic VS. Although achieved in over half of people after microsurgery, open-set speech perception is more reliably attained in patients who are treated with observation or radiosurgery compared with microsurgical resection. These data may inform patient counseling and VS tumor management in people who may benefit from implantation.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.