正念干预会造成伤害吗?学习对疼痛应用正念(LAMP)实用临床试验的结果。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae056
Diana J Burgess, Collin Calvert, Ann Bangerter, Mariah Branson, Lee J S Cross, Roni Evans, John E Ferguson, Jessica K Friedman, Emily M Hagel Campbell, Alexander C Haley, Sierra Hennessy, Colleen Kraft, Mallory Mahaffey, Marianne S Matthias, Laura A Meis, J Greg Serpa, Stephanie L Taylor, Brent C Taylor
{"title":"正念干预会造成伤害吗?学习对疼痛应用正念(LAMP)实用临床试验的结果。","authors":"Diana J Burgess, Collin Calvert, Ann Bangerter, Mariah Branson, Lee J S Cross, Roni Evans, John E Ferguson, Jessica K Friedman, Emily M Hagel Campbell, Alexander C Haley, Sierra Hennessy, Colleen Kraft, Mallory Mahaffey, Marianne S Matthias, Laura A Meis, J Greg Serpa, Stephanie L Taylor, Brent C Taylor","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in clinical and nonclinical settings, there has been little systematic study of their potential risks. To address this gap, we examined differences in psychological and physical worsening among participants in the usual care and intervention conditions of a 3-group, randomized pragmatic trial (Learning to Apply Mindfulness to Pain [LAMP]) that tested the effectiveness of 2 approaches to delivering MBIs to patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 374 male and 334 female patients with chronic pain enrolled in the LAMP trial who completed a 10-week follow-up survey, 61% of whom had a mental health diagnosis. Psychological and physical worsening was assessed by a checklist asking whether participants experienced specific symptoms since beginning the study. We used multivariable logistic regression models with imputed data to determine whether predicted probabilities of increased symptoms differed between usual care and the 2 MBIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in usual care were more likely to report experiencing increased psychological and physical worsening than were those in the MBIs, including an increase in disturbing memories; sadness, anxiousness, and fatigue; isolation and loneliness; and feeling more upset than usual when something reminded them of the past.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBIs do not appear to cause harm, in terms of increased symptoms, for this population of patients with chronic pain and high levels of mental health comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Preregistration with an analysis plan at www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04526158. Patient enrollment began December 4, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":"25 Supplement_1","pages":"S68-S76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do mindfulness interventions cause harm? Findings from the Learning to Apply Mindfulness to Pain (LAMP) Pragmatic Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Diana J Burgess, Collin Calvert, Ann Bangerter, Mariah Branson, Lee J S Cross, Roni Evans, John E Ferguson, Jessica K Friedman, Emily M Hagel Campbell, Alexander C Haley, Sierra Hennessy, Colleen Kraft, Mallory Mahaffey, Marianne S Matthias, Laura A Meis, J Greg Serpa, Stephanie L Taylor, Brent C Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnae056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in clinical and nonclinical settings, there has been little systematic study of their potential risks. To address this gap, we examined differences in psychological and physical worsening among participants in the usual care and intervention conditions of a 3-group, randomized pragmatic trial (Learning to Apply Mindfulness to Pain [LAMP]) that tested the effectiveness of 2 approaches to delivering MBIs to patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 374 male and 334 female patients with chronic pain enrolled in the LAMP trial who completed a 10-week follow-up survey, 61% of whom had a mental health diagnosis. Psychological and physical worsening was assessed by a checklist asking whether participants experienced specific symptoms since beginning the study. We used multivariable logistic regression models with imputed data to determine whether predicted probabilities of increased symptoms differed between usual care and the 2 MBIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in usual care were more likely to report experiencing increased psychological and physical worsening than were those in the MBIs, including an increase in disturbing memories; sadness, anxiousness, and fatigue; isolation and loneliness; and feeling more upset than usual when something reminded them of the past.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBIs do not appear to cause harm, in terms of increased symptoms, for this population of patients with chronic pain and high levels of mental health comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Preregistration with an analysis plan at www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04526158. Patient enrollment began December 4, 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 Supplement_1\",\"pages\":\"S68-S76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548848/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管正念干预(MBI)被广泛应用于临床和非临床环境中,但对其潜在风险的系统研究却很少。为了填补这一空白,我们研究了在一项3组随机实用试验(Learning to Apply Mindfulness to Pain [LAMP])中,常规护理和干预条件下参与者心理和身体恶化的差异,该试验测试了向慢性疼痛患者提供正念干预的两种方法的有效性:样本包括 374 名男性和 334 名女性慢性疼痛患者,他们都参加了 LAMP 试验,并完成了为期 10 周的随访调查,其中 61% 的患者有心理健康诊断。心理和身体状况的恶化是通过询问参与者自研究开始以来是否出现特定症状的检查表来评估的。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型和估算数据来确定常规护理和两种 MBIs 的预测症状加重概率是否存在差异:结果:接受常规治疗的参与者比接受 MBIs 治疗的参与者更有可能报告心理和身体状况恶化,包括干扰记忆增加;悲伤、焦虑和疲劳;孤独和寂寞;以及当某些事情让他们想起过去时比平时更难过:结论:MBIs 似乎不会对慢性疼痛和高度精神健康合并症患者造成伤害,不会增加他们的症状:预注册及分析计划请访问 www.ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04526158。患者注册始于 2020 年 12 月 4 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do mindfulness interventions cause harm? Findings from the Learning to Apply Mindfulness to Pain (LAMP) Pragmatic Clinical Trial.

Background: Although mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely used in clinical and nonclinical settings, there has been little systematic study of their potential risks. To address this gap, we examined differences in psychological and physical worsening among participants in the usual care and intervention conditions of a 3-group, randomized pragmatic trial (Learning to Apply Mindfulness to Pain [LAMP]) that tested the effectiveness of 2 approaches to delivering MBIs to patients with chronic pain.

Methods: The sample consisted of 374 male and 334 female patients with chronic pain enrolled in the LAMP trial who completed a 10-week follow-up survey, 61% of whom had a mental health diagnosis. Psychological and physical worsening was assessed by a checklist asking whether participants experienced specific symptoms since beginning the study. We used multivariable logistic regression models with imputed data to determine whether predicted probabilities of increased symptoms differed between usual care and the 2 MBIs.

Results: Participants in usual care were more likely to report experiencing increased psychological and physical worsening than were those in the MBIs, including an increase in disturbing memories; sadness, anxiousness, and fatigue; isolation and loneliness; and feeling more upset than usual when something reminded them of the past.

Conclusions: MBIs do not appear to cause harm, in terms of increased symptoms, for this population of patients with chronic pain and high levels of mental health comorbidities.

Clinical trial registration: Preregistration with an analysis plan at www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04526158. Patient enrollment began December 4, 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian randomization study finds no evidence for causal effects of C-reactive protein (CRP) on chronic pain conditions. Pressure Pain Sensitivity is Independent of Structural Pathology in Patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Association of Opioid Tapering with Pain-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Primary Care Visits: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Proinflammatory Diet is Associated with Higher Pain, Disease Severity and Biochemical Parameters Associated with Inflammation in Fibromyalgia. Identifying factors associated with persistent opioid use after total joint arthroplasty: A retrospective review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1