在退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健系统中实施疼痛导航员计划:分组随机实用临床试验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae074
Courtni France, Chad E Cook, Cynthia J Coffman, Christa Tumminello, Ashley Choate, Steven Z George, Trevor A Lentz, Susan N Hastings
{"title":"在退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健系统中实施疼痛导航员计划:分组随机实用临床试验。","authors":"Courtni France, Chad E Cook, Cynthia J Coffman, Christa Tumminello, Ashley Choate, Steven Z George, Trevor A Lentz, Susan N Hastings","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This manuscript describes the uptake of the AIM-Back Pain Navigator Pathway (PNP) designed to encourage use of non-pharmacologic care options within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This manuscript describes the implementation of a telehealth intervention from one arm of a multisite, embedded, cluster-randomized pragmatic trial comparing the effectiveness of two novel clinical care pathways that provide access to non-pharmacologic care for Veterans with low back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ten VHA clinics.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>19 pain navigators, >200 primary care physicians, and over 1000 Veterans were involved in the PNP implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were generated within the VHA electronic health record (EHR) for the ongoing AIM-Back trial to describe PNP implementation for system-level findings in terms of number of visits, and type of care received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 3-year period, 9 of 10 clinics implemented the PNP within the context of the AIM-Back trial. The most frequent care recommended in the PNP included physical therapy, chiropractic, acupuncture, and yoga/tai chi. During follow-up at six-weeks, ∼50% of Veterans elected to receive a different care choice than what was initially prescribed. Notable variation across clinics was documented for PNP based on time to initiation of care and follow-up rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the telehealth delivered PNP provides a nuanced understanding of the introduction of novel care programs within diverse clinical settings. These findings are most applicable to care programs that are delivered remotely and involve facilitation of existing care options.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":"25 Supplement_1","pages":"S83-S90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The implementation of a pain navigator program in the department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) health care systems: a cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Courtni France, Chad E Cook, Cynthia J Coffman, Christa Tumminello, Ashley Choate, Steven Z George, Trevor A Lentz, Susan N Hastings\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnae074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This manuscript describes the uptake of the AIM-Back Pain Navigator Pathway (PNP) designed to encourage use of non-pharmacologic care options within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This manuscript describes the implementation of a telehealth intervention from one arm of a multisite, embedded, cluster-randomized pragmatic trial comparing the effectiveness of two novel clinical care pathways that provide access to non-pharmacologic care for Veterans with low back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ten VHA clinics.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>19 pain navigators, >200 primary care physicians, and over 1000 Veterans were involved in the PNP implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were generated within the VHA electronic health record (EHR) for the ongoing AIM-Back trial to describe PNP implementation for system-level findings in terms of number of visits, and type of care received.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 3-year period, 9 of 10 clinics implemented the PNP within the context of the AIM-Back trial. The most frequent care recommended in the PNP included physical therapy, chiropractic, acupuncture, and yoga/tai chi. During follow-up at six-weeks, ∼50% of Veterans elected to receive a different care choice than what was initially prescribed. Notable variation across clinics was documented for PNP based on time to initiation of care and follow-up rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the telehealth delivered PNP provides a nuanced understanding of the introduction of novel care programs within diverse clinical settings. These findings are most applicable to care programs that are delivered remotely and involve facilitation of existing care options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 Supplement_1\",\"pages\":\"S83-S90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:本手稿介绍了退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)为鼓励使用非药物治疗方案而设计的 AIM-Back Pain Navigator Pathway (PNP) 的使用情况:本手稿介绍了一项多站点、嵌入式、群组随机化实用性试验中远程医疗干预措施的实施情况,该试验比较了两种新型临床护理途径的有效性,这两种途径可为患有腰背痛(LBP)的退伍军人提供非药物护理:环境:10 个退伍军人事务部诊所:19名疼痛导航员、200多名初级保健医生和1000多名退伍军人参与了PNP的实施:方法:在退伍军人管理局的电子健康记录(EHR)中生成数据,用于正在进行的 AIM-Back 试验,以描述 PNP 的实施情况,从就诊次数和接受的护理类型方面得出系统级结论:在 3 年的时间里,10 家诊所中有 9 家在 AIM-Back 试验范围内实施了 PNP。PNP推荐的最常见护理包括理疗、整脊、针灸和瑜伽/太极。在六周的随访中,50% 的退伍军人选择了与最初处方不同的治疗方案。根据开始护理的时间和随访率,PNP 在各诊所之间存在显著差异:通过实施远程医疗提供的 PNP,我们对在不同临床环境中引入新型护理计划有了细致的了解。这些发现最适用于远程提供并涉及促进现有护理方案的护理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The implementation of a pain navigator program in the department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) health care systems: a cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial.

Objective: This manuscript describes the uptake of the AIM-Back Pain Navigator Pathway (PNP) designed to encourage use of non-pharmacologic care options within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Design: This manuscript describes the implementation of a telehealth intervention from one arm of a multisite, embedded, cluster-randomized pragmatic trial comparing the effectiveness of two novel clinical care pathways that provide access to non-pharmacologic care for Veterans with low back pain (LBP).

Setting: Ten VHA clinics.

Subjects: 19 pain navigators, >200 primary care physicians, and over 1000 Veterans were involved in the PNP implementation.

Methods: Data were generated within the VHA electronic health record (EHR) for the ongoing AIM-Back trial to describe PNP implementation for system-level findings in terms of number of visits, and type of care received.

Results: Over a 3-year period, 9 of 10 clinics implemented the PNP within the context of the AIM-Back trial. The most frequent care recommended in the PNP included physical therapy, chiropractic, acupuncture, and yoga/tai chi. During follow-up at six-weeks, ∼50% of Veterans elected to receive a different care choice than what was initially prescribed. Notable variation across clinics was documented for PNP based on time to initiation of care and follow-up rates.

Conclusions: Implementation of the telehealth delivered PNP provides a nuanced understanding of the introduction of novel care programs within diverse clinical settings. These findings are most applicable to care programs that are delivered remotely and involve facilitation of existing care options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian randomization study finds no evidence for causal effects of C-reactive protein (CRP) on chronic pain conditions. Pressure Pain Sensitivity is Independent of Structural Pathology in Patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Association of Opioid Tapering with Pain-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Primary Care Visits: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Proinflammatory Diet is Associated with Higher Pain, Disease Severity and Biochemical Parameters Associated with Inflammation in Fibromyalgia. Identifying factors associated with persistent opioid use after total joint arthroplasty: A retrospective review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1