腹腔镜经皮腹膜外闭合术(LPEC)与开腹手术治疗 5 岁以下儿童腹股沟疝疼痛的比较。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Surgery International Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s00383-024-05875-x
Hideaki Sato, Sei Adachi, Miri Tominaga, Shunsuke Osawa, Ai Tayama, Noriyoshi Nakayama, Yu Watarai
{"title":"腹腔镜经皮腹膜外闭合术(LPEC)与开腹手术治疗 5 岁以下儿童腹股沟疝疼痛的比较。","authors":"Hideaki Sato, Sei Adachi, Miri Tominaga, Shunsuke Osawa, Ai Tayama, Noriyoshi Nakayama, Yu Watarai","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05875-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The laparoscopic approach (LA) for repairing inguinal hernias (IH), especially laparoscopic extraperitoneal percutaneous closure (LPEC) has become popular minimally invasive surgical technique. However, invasiveness is difficult to evaluate in children of < 5 years of age, as they cannot adequately express their pain. The current study utilized a pain scoring system compare pain in patients of < 5 years of age who were treated by LA or traditional open approach (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 74 IH patients of < 5 years of age who underwent surgery in our hospital between January 2022 and July 2023 were reviewed. Revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scores were used to quantitatively evaluate the degree of pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients (mean age, 2.85 years) underwent treatment with an OA, and 27 patients (mean age, 2.37 years) underwent treatment with an LA. The FLACC scores in the OA and LA groups were 0.21 and 0.44, respectively. In a subanalysis by age groups, The FLACC scores in the OA and LA groups were 0.09 and 0.5 in patients of < 2 years of age, respectively, CONCLUSION: The reduced invasiveness of LA relative to OA did not minimize postoperative pain, especially in patients < 2 years of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of pain between laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and open procedure for inguinal hernias in children below 5 years of age.\",\"authors\":\"Hideaki Sato, Sei Adachi, Miri Tominaga, Shunsuke Osawa, Ai Tayama, Noriyoshi Nakayama, Yu Watarai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00383-024-05875-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The laparoscopic approach (LA) for repairing inguinal hernias (IH), especially laparoscopic extraperitoneal percutaneous closure (LPEC) has become popular minimally invasive surgical technique. However, invasiveness is difficult to evaluate in children of < 5 years of age, as they cannot adequately express their pain. The current study utilized a pain scoring system compare pain in patients of < 5 years of age who were treated by LA or traditional open approach (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 74 IH patients of < 5 years of age who underwent surgery in our hospital between January 2022 and July 2023 were reviewed. Revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scores were used to quantitatively evaluate the degree of pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients (mean age, 2.85 years) underwent treatment with an OA, and 27 patients (mean age, 2.37 years) underwent treatment with an LA. The FLACC scores in the OA and LA groups were 0.21 and 0.44, respectively. In a subanalysis by age groups, The FLACC scores in the OA and LA groups were 0.09 and 0.5 in patients of < 2 years of age, respectively, CONCLUSION: The reduced invasiveness of LA relative to OA did not minimize postoperative pain, especially in patients < 2 years of age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05875-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05875-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹腔镜方法(LA)修复腹股沟疝(IH),尤其是腹腔镜腹膜外经皮闭合术(LPEC)已成为流行的微创外科技术。然而,对腹股沟疝气患儿的侵入性难以评估:结果:74 名 IH 患者的病历:47 名患者(平均年龄 2.85 岁)接受了 OA 治疗,27 名患者(平均年龄 2.37 岁)接受了 LA 治疗。OA 组和 LA 组的 FLACC 评分分别为 0.21 和 0.44。在按年龄组进行的子分析中,OA 组和 LA 组患者的 FLACC 评分分别为 0.09 和 0.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of pain between laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and open procedure for inguinal hernias in children below 5 years of age.

Purpose: The laparoscopic approach (LA) for repairing inguinal hernias (IH), especially laparoscopic extraperitoneal percutaneous closure (LPEC) has become popular minimally invasive surgical technique. However, invasiveness is difficult to evaluate in children of < 5 years of age, as they cannot adequately express their pain. The current study utilized a pain scoring system compare pain in patients of < 5 years of age who were treated by LA or traditional open approach (OA).

Methods: The records of 74 IH patients of < 5 years of age who underwent surgery in our hospital between January 2022 and July 2023 were reviewed. Revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scores were used to quantitatively evaluate the degree of pain.

Results: Forty-seven patients (mean age, 2.85 years) underwent treatment with an OA, and 27 patients (mean age, 2.37 years) underwent treatment with an LA. The FLACC scores in the OA and LA groups were 0.21 and 0.44, respectively. In a subanalysis by age groups, The FLACC scores in the OA and LA groups were 0.09 and 0.5 in patients of < 2 years of age, respectively, CONCLUSION: The reduced invasiveness of LA relative to OA did not minimize postoperative pain, especially in patients < 2 years of age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
期刊最新文献
A comparative study on the efficacy of laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy versus single ureteral bladder reimplantation in treating pediatric complete renal duplication. Chyme reinfusion practices in the neonatal population. Comparison of different Kasai portoenterostomy techniques in the outcomes of biliary atresia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Association between nighttime/weekend visits and patient outcomes in children with blunt liver and spleen injuries. Innovative minimally invasive gastric pull-up techniques in children: SILS and robot-assisted gastric pull-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1