Raphael-Kyrillos M Saleib, Begüm Pekbay, Michiel H J Verhofstad, Maria A Paping, Mark G Van Vledder, Oscar J F Van Waes
{"title":"分析四肢截肢患者骨整合的研究趋势和发展:系统的文献计量分析和研究建议。","authors":"Raphael-Kyrillos M Saleib, Begüm Pekbay, Michiel H J Verhofstad, Maria A Paping, Mark G Van Vledder, Oscar J F Van Waes","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone-anchored protheses (BAPs) by means of osseointegrated implants are increasingly being used in amputees with socket-related issues. Clinical advancements are being published by more and more centers worldwide. Although the number of publications and interest in BAP is growing, a systematic evaluation of scholarly output is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify scholarly output, understand research trends and make research recommendations in the clinical field of BAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches in Medline All, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were completed in February 2023. The results were deduplicated, screened, and assessed for quality by independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were as follows: clinical studies and BAP in the extremities. Articles were excluded if they were animal or fundamental studies, nonclinical reports, had a study population less than 10 patients, or BAP was performed in areas other than extremities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twelve articles were included and published between 1993 and 2023. An annual growth rate of 10.3% was found and research was published in 62 different journals. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and The Bone & Joint Journal were the most prolific journals. Hagberg K, Aschoff HH, and Branemark R were major contributors to BAP research. Collaborations are predominantly among high-income countries. Main research trends were on rehabilitation, questionnaires, complication managements, and implant treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research on BAP shows an increasing global trend, highlighting key research areas and authors. A unified global research agenda, stakeholders' collaborations, and consensus are essential for addressing knowledge gaps and development future direction of BAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing research trends and developments in osseointegration in patients with extremity amputations: Systematic bibliometric analysis and research recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Raphael-Kyrillos M Saleib, Begüm Pekbay, Michiel H J Verhofstad, Maria A Paping, Mark G Van Vledder, Oscar J F Van Waes\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone-anchored protheses (BAPs) by means of osseointegrated implants are increasingly being used in amputees with socket-related issues. Clinical advancements are being published by more and more centers worldwide. Although the number of publications and interest in BAP is growing, a systematic evaluation of scholarly output is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify scholarly output, understand research trends and make research recommendations in the clinical field of BAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches in Medline All, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were completed in February 2023. The results were deduplicated, screened, and assessed for quality by independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were as follows: clinical studies and BAP in the extremities. Articles were excluded if they were animal or fundamental studies, nonclinical reports, had a study population less than 10 patients, or BAP was performed in areas other than extremities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twelve articles were included and published between 1993 and 2023. An annual growth rate of 10.3% was found and research was published in 62 different journals. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and The Bone & Joint Journal were the most prolific journals. Hagberg K, Aschoff HH, and Branemark R were major contributors to BAP research. Collaborations are predominantly among high-income countries. Main research trends were on rehabilitation, questionnaires, complication managements, and implant treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research on BAP shows an increasing global trend, highlighting key research areas and authors. A unified global research agenda, stakeholders' collaborations, and consensus are essential for addressing knowledge gaps and development future direction of BAP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000410\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:通过骨结合植入物制作的骨固定假体(BAPs)正越来越多地用于有关节窝相关问题的截肢者。全球越来越多的中心发表了临床研究进展。虽然有关 BAP 的论文数量和关注度在不断增加,但却缺乏对学术成果的系统评估:确定 BAP 临床领域的学术成果、了解研究趋势并提出研究建议:方法:2023 年 2 月在 Medline All、Embase、Web of Science Core Collection、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 中完成了系统检索。独立审稿人对检索结果进行了重复、筛选和质量评估。纳入标准如下:四肢的临床研究和 BAP。如果文章是动物或基础研究、非临床报告、研究人群少于 10 名患者,或 BAP 在四肢以外的部位进行,则排除在外:结果:共收录了 112 篇发表于 1993 年至 2023 年的文章。年增长率为 10.3%,研究发表在 62 种不同的期刊上。Prosthetics and Orthotics International》、《Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research》和《The Bone & Joint Journal》是发表论文最多的期刊。Hagberg K、Aschoff HH 和 Branemark R 是 BAP 研究的主要贡献者。合作主要集中在高收入国家。主要研究趋势是康复、问卷调查、并发症处理和植入治疗:结论:关于 BAP 的研究显示出日益增长的全球趋势,突出了主要研究领域和作者。统一的全球研究议程、利益相关者的合作和共识对于解决知识差距和发展 BAP 的未来方向至关重要。
Analyzing research trends and developments in osseointegration in patients with extremity amputations: Systematic bibliometric analysis and research recommendations.
Background: Bone-anchored protheses (BAPs) by means of osseointegrated implants are increasingly being used in amputees with socket-related issues. Clinical advancements are being published by more and more centers worldwide. Although the number of publications and interest in BAP is growing, a systematic evaluation of scholarly output is lacking.
Objective: To identify scholarly output, understand research trends and make research recommendations in the clinical field of BAP.
Methods: Systematic searches in Medline All, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were completed in February 2023. The results were deduplicated, screened, and assessed for quality by independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were as follows: clinical studies and BAP in the extremities. Articles were excluded if they were animal or fundamental studies, nonclinical reports, had a study population less than 10 patients, or BAP was performed in areas other than extremities.
Results: One hundred twelve articles were included and published between 1993 and 2023. An annual growth rate of 10.3% was found and research was published in 62 different journals. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and The Bone & Joint Journal were the most prolific journals. Hagberg K, Aschoff HH, and Branemark R were major contributors to BAP research. Collaborations are predominantly among high-income countries. Main research trends were on rehabilitation, questionnaires, complication managements, and implant treatment.
Conclusions: Research on BAP shows an increasing global trend, highlighting key research areas and authors. A unified global research agenda, stakeholders' collaborations, and consensus are essential for addressing knowledge gaps and development future direction of BAP.
期刊介绍:
Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.