用于鬼蜘蛛(Araneae: Anyphaenidae: Amaurobioidinae)物种鉴定和系统发育估计的遗传条形码。

IF 1.8 2区 生物学 Q3 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Invertebrate Systematics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1071/IS24053
Mariana L Barone, Jeremy D Wilson, Lorena Zapata, Eduardo M Soto, Charles R Haddad, Cristian Grismado, Matías Izquierdo, Elizabeth Arias, Jaime Pizarro-Araya, Raúl Briones, Juan Enrique Barriga, Luciano Peralta, Martín J Ramírez
{"title":"用于鬼蜘蛛(Araneae: Anyphaenidae: Amaurobioidinae)物种鉴定和系统发育估计的遗传条形码。","authors":"Mariana L Barone, Jeremy D Wilson, Lorena Zapata, Eduardo M Soto, Charles R Haddad, Cristian Grismado, Matías Izquierdo, Elizabeth Arias, Jaime Pizarro-Araya, Raúl Briones, Juan Enrique Barriga, Luciano Peralta, Martín J Ramírez","doi":"10.1071/IS24053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The identification of spider species presents many challenges, since in most cases the characters used are from genital structures that are only fully developed in the adult stage, hence the identification of immatures is most often not possible. Additionally, these structures usually also present some intra-specific variability, which in some cases makes the identification of closely related species difficult. The genetic barcode technique (DNA barcodes), based on sequencing of the mitochondrial marker cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI ), has proven a useful, complementary tool to overcome these limitations. In this work, the contribution of DNA barcoding to the taxonomy of the subfamily Amaurobioidinae is explored using the refined single linkage analysis (RESL) algorithm for the delimitation of operational taxonomic units (OTUs), in comparison with the assemble species by automatic partitioning (ASAP) algorithm, and presented in conjunction with an updated molecular phylogenetic analysis of three other markers (28S rRNA, 16S rRNA, Histone H3 ), in addition to COI . Of a total of 97 included species identified by morphology, 82 species were concordant with the operational taxonomic units obtained from RESL, representing an 85% correspondence between the two methods. Similar results were obtained using the ASAP algorithm. Previous observations of morphological variation within the same species are supported, and this technique provides new information on genetic structure and potentially cryptic species. Most of the discrepancies between DNA barcoding and morphological identification are explained by low geographic sampling or by divergent or geographically structured lineages. After the addition of many specimens with only COI data, the multi-marker phylogenetic analysis is consistent with previous results and the support is improved. The markers COI , closely followed by 28S , are the most phylogenetically informative. We conclude that the barcode DNA technique is a valuable source of data for the delimitation of species of Amaurobioidinae, in conjunction with morphological and geographic data, and it is also useful for the detection of cases that require a more detailed and meticulous study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54927,"journal":{"name":"Invertebrate Systematics","volume":"38 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic barcodes for species identification and phylogenetic estimation in ghost spiders (Araneae: Anyphaenidae: Amaurobioidinae).\",\"authors\":\"Mariana L Barone, Jeremy D Wilson, Lorena Zapata, Eduardo M Soto, Charles R Haddad, Cristian Grismado, Matías Izquierdo, Elizabeth Arias, Jaime Pizarro-Araya, Raúl Briones, Juan Enrique Barriga, Luciano Peralta, Martín J Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/IS24053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The identification of spider species presents many challenges, since in most cases the characters used are from genital structures that are only fully developed in the adult stage, hence the identification of immatures is most often not possible. Additionally, these structures usually also present some intra-specific variability, which in some cases makes the identification of closely related species difficult. The genetic barcode technique (DNA barcodes), based on sequencing of the mitochondrial marker cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI ), has proven a useful, complementary tool to overcome these limitations. In this work, the contribution of DNA barcoding to the taxonomy of the subfamily Amaurobioidinae is explored using the refined single linkage analysis (RESL) algorithm for the delimitation of operational taxonomic units (OTUs), in comparison with the assemble species by automatic partitioning (ASAP) algorithm, and presented in conjunction with an updated molecular phylogenetic analysis of three other markers (28S rRNA, 16S rRNA, Histone H3 ), in addition to COI . Of a total of 97 included species identified by morphology, 82 species were concordant with the operational taxonomic units obtained from RESL, representing an 85% correspondence between the two methods. Similar results were obtained using the ASAP algorithm. Previous observations of morphological variation within the same species are supported, and this technique provides new information on genetic structure and potentially cryptic species. Most of the discrepancies between DNA barcoding and morphological identification are explained by low geographic sampling or by divergent or geographically structured lineages. After the addition of many specimens with only COI data, the multi-marker phylogenetic analysis is consistent with previous results and the support is improved. The markers COI , closely followed by 28S , are the most phylogenetically informative. We conclude that the barcode DNA technique is a valuable source of data for the delimitation of species of Amaurobioidinae, in conjunction with morphological and geographic data, and it is also useful for the detection of cases that require a more detailed and meticulous study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Invertebrate Systematics\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Invertebrate Systematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/IS24053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Invertebrate Systematics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IS24053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蜘蛛物种的鉴定面临着许多挑战,因为在大多数情况下,所使用的特征来自成虫阶段才完全发育的生殖器结构,因此通常无法鉴定未成熟的蜘蛛。此外,这些结构通常还具有一定的种内变异性,这在某些情况下会给近缘物种的鉴定带来困难。事实证明,基于线粒体标记细胞色素 c 氧化酶亚单位 I(COI)测序的遗传条形码技术(DNA 条形码)是克服这些局限性的有用补充工具。在这项工作中,我们使用精细的单链分析(RESL)算法对操作分类单元(OTUs)进行了划分,并与自动分区(ASAP)算法进行了比较,探讨了 DNA 条形码对 Amaurobioidinae 亚科分类学的贡献,并结合除 COI 之外的其他三个标记(28S rRNA、16S rRNA、组蛋白 H3)的最新分子系统学分析进行了介绍。在通过形态学鉴定的 97 个物种中,有 82 个物种与 RESL 得出的操作分类单元一致,两种方法的对应率为 85%。使用 ASAP 算法也得到了类似的结果。以前对同一物种内部形态变异的观察结果得到了支持,该技术提供了有关遗传结构和潜在隐蔽物种的新信息。DNA 条形码与形态鉴定之间的差异大多是由于地理取样较少或由于不同的或地理结构的种系造成的。在增加了许多仅有 COI 数据的标本后,多标记系统发生分析与之前的结果一致,支持率也有所提高。COI 标记和 28S 标记的系统发育信息量最大。我们的结论是,条形码 DNA 技术与形态学和地理学数据相结合,是划分 Amaurobioidinae 物种的宝贵数据来源,它还有助于发现需要进行更详细、更细致研究的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genetic barcodes for species identification and phylogenetic estimation in ghost spiders (Araneae: Anyphaenidae: Amaurobioidinae).

The identification of spider species presents many challenges, since in most cases the characters used are from genital structures that are only fully developed in the adult stage, hence the identification of immatures is most often not possible. Additionally, these structures usually also present some intra-specific variability, which in some cases makes the identification of closely related species difficult. The genetic barcode technique (DNA barcodes), based on sequencing of the mitochondrial marker cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI ), has proven a useful, complementary tool to overcome these limitations. In this work, the contribution of DNA barcoding to the taxonomy of the subfamily Amaurobioidinae is explored using the refined single linkage analysis (RESL) algorithm for the delimitation of operational taxonomic units (OTUs), in comparison with the assemble species by automatic partitioning (ASAP) algorithm, and presented in conjunction with an updated molecular phylogenetic analysis of three other markers (28S rRNA, 16S rRNA, Histone H3 ), in addition to COI . Of a total of 97 included species identified by morphology, 82 species were concordant with the operational taxonomic units obtained from RESL, representing an 85% correspondence between the two methods. Similar results were obtained using the ASAP algorithm. Previous observations of morphological variation within the same species are supported, and this technique provides new information on genetic structure and potentially cryptic species. Most of the discrepancies between DNA barcoding and morphological identification are explained by low geographic sampling or by divergent or geographically structured lineages. After the addition of many specimens with only COI data, the multi-marker phylogenetic analysis is consistent with previous results and the support is improved. The markers COI , closely followed by 28S , are the most phylogenetically informative. We conclude that the barcode DNA technique is a valuable source of data for the delimitation of species of Amaurobioidinae, in conjunction with morphological and geographic data, and it is also useful for the detection of cases that require a more detailed and meticulous study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Invertebrate Systematics
Invertebrate Systematics 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Invertebrate Systematics (formerly known as Invertebrate Taxonomy) is an international journal publishing original and significant contributions on the systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of all invertebrate taxa. Articles in the journal provide comprehensive treatments of clearly defined taxonomic groups, often emphasising their biodiversity patterns and/or biological aspects. The journal also includes contributions on the systematics of selected species that are of particular conservation, economic, medical or veterinary importance. Invertebrate Systematics is a vital resource globally for scientists, students, conservation biologists, environmental consultants and government policy advisors who are interested in terrestrial, freshwater and marine systems. Invertebrate Systematics is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
期刊最新文献
Genetic barcodes for species identification and phylogenetic estimation in ghost spiders (Araneae: Anyphaenidae: Amaurobioidinae). A molecular assessment of species boundaries and relationships in the Australian brine shrimp Parartemia (Anostraca: Parartemiidae). DNA but not always morphology help to recognise monophyletic genera within 'Cercyon' terrestrial water scavenger beetles: a case study of Asiacyon gen. nov. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Integrative taxonomy of Teucriogethes pollen beetles (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae: Meligethinae), with implications on the systematics of the genus Teucrium (Lamiaceae). Molecular phylogeny of Boninia (Platyhelminthes: Polycladida), with description of a new species from the Pacific coasts of Panama.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1