结构化、家庭支持和以患者为中心的临终关怀规划对姑息关怀患者及其家属临终决策的影响:随机对照试验方案。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01588-z
Doris Y P Leung, Joyce O K Chung, Helen Y L Chan, Raymond S K Lo, Kevin Li, Po Tin Lam, Nancy H Y Ng
{"title":"结构化、家庭支持和以患者为中心的临终关怀规划对姑息关怀患者及其家属临终决策的影响:随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Doris Y P Leung, Joyce O K Chung, Helen Y L Chan, Raymond S K Lo, Kevin Li, Po Tin Lam, Nancy H Y Ng","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01588-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) is a well-recognized quality indicator for palliative care. Despite two decades of effort, previous studies showed that ACP-related documentation and end-of-life discussion rates remain low for palliative care patients. Although ACP is about self-determination and autonomy, studies consistently show the importance of family involvement in adult patient's medical decision-making. Yet, research on ACP interventions with structured components targeting family member remained limited. The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme for adult palliative care patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a 2-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 6 and 12 months. One hundred and seventy eligible palliative care patients and their families are planned to be recruited from three hospitals, and randomized to either a structured, family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme (ACP-Family) or usual ACP care (ACP-UC) arm. The ACP-Family intervention consists of 2 sessions. The primary outcome is family's prediction accuracy of patient's treatment preferences at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include proportions of new ACP documentations and family-reported perception of whether the patient's end-of-life (EOL) care preference was respected; patient's decisional conflict; quality of communication; family's decision-making confidence; family's anxiety and depression; and patients' and family members' satisfaction of the intervention. Outcomes of the two groups will be compared using regressions and linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will provide rigorous scientific evidence on the effectiveness of a structured and well-design family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme for adult palliative care patients and their family members in the hospital setting. If the ACP-Family proves to be effective, it will provide a structured and systematic approach to facilitate ACP discussions involving family members. This will respond to local needs and inform international ACP practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05935540.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a structured, family-supported, and patient-centred advance care planning on end-of-life decision making among palliative care patients and their family members: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Doris Y P Leung, Joyce O K Chung, Helen Y L Chan, Raymond S K Lo, Kevin Li, Po Tin Lam, Nancy H Y Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-024-01588-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) is a well-recognized quality indicator for palliative care. Despite two decades of effort, previous studies showed that ACP-related documentation and end-of-life discussion rates remain low for palliative care patients. Although ACP is about self-determination and autonomy, studies consistently show the importance of family involvement in adult patient's medical decision-making. Yet, research on ACP interventions with structured components targeting family member remained limited. The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme for adult palliative care patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a 2-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 6 and 12 months. One hundred and seventy eligible palliative care patients and their families are planned to be recruited from three hospitals, and randomized to either a structured, family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme (ACP-Family) or usual ACP care (ACP-UC) arm. The ACP-Family intervention consists of 2 sessions. The primary outcome is family's prediction accuracy of patient's treatment preferences at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include proportions of new ACP documentations and family-reported perception of whether the patient's end-of-life (EOL) care preference was respected; patient's decisional conflict; quality of communication; family's decision-making confidence; family's anxiety and depression; and patients' and family members' satisfaction of the intervention. Outcomes of the two groups will be compared using regressions and linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will provide rigorous scientific evidence on the effectiveness of a structured and well-design family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme for adult palliative care patients and their family members in the hospital setting. If the ACP-Family proves to be effective, it will provide a structured and systematic approach to facilitate ACP discussions involving family members. This will respond to local needs and inform international ACP practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05935540.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542196/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01588-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01588-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预先护理计划(ACP)是姑息关怀领域公认的质量指标。尽管经过二十年的努力,以往的研究表明,姑息治疗患者的 ACP 相关文件记录率和临终讨论率仍然很低。尽管 ACP 是关于自我决定和自主权,但研究始终表明家属参与成年患者医疗决策的重要性。然而,有关针对家庭成员的 ACP 干预措施的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在评估针对成年姑息关怀患者及其家属的结构化、家庭支持、以患者为中心的 ACP 计划的有效性:这是一项双臂平行组随机对照试验,随访时间为 6 个月和 12 个月。计划从三家医院招募170名符合条件的姑息关怀患者及其家属,并将其随机分配到结构化、家庭支持、以患者为中心的ACP项目(ACP-Family)或常规ACP关怀(ACP-UC)组。ACP-家庭干预包括两个疗程。主要结果是家属对患者 6 个月后治疗偏好的预测准确性。次要结果包括新的 ACP 文件比例和家属报告的对患者生命末期 (EOL) 护理偏好是否得到尊重的看法;患者的决策冲突;沟通质量;家属的决策信心;家属的焦虑和抑郁;以及患者和家属对干预的满意度。两组结果将通过回归和线性混合效应模型进行比较:本研究将提供严谨的科学证据,证明在医院环境中为成年姑息关怀患者及其家属开展的、有组织的、精心设计的、以患者为中心的家庭支持式 ACP 计划的有效性。如果 "ACP-家庭 "被证明是有效的,它将提供一种结构化和系统化的方法来促进有家庭成员参与的 ACP 讨论。这将满足当地的需求,并为国际 ACP 实践提供参考:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT05935540.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of a structured, family-supported, and patient-centred advance care planning on end-of-life decision making among palliative care patients and their family members: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a well-recognized quality indicator for palliative care. Despite two decades of effort, previous studies showed that ACP-related documentation and end-of-life discussion rates remain low for palliative care patients. Although ACP is about self-determination and autonomy, studies consistently show the importance of family involvement in adult patient's medical decision-making. Yet, research on ACP interventions with structured components targeting family member remained limited. The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme for adult palliative care patients and their families.

Methods: This is a 2-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 6 and 12 months. One hundred and seventy eligible palliative care patients and their families are planned to be recruited from three hospitals, and randomized to either a structured, family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme (ACP-Family) or usual ACP care (ACP-UC) arm. The ACP-Family intervention consists of 2 sessions. The primary outcome is family's prediction accuracy of patient's treatment preferences at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include proportions of new ACP documentations and family-reported perception of whether the patient's end-of-life (EOL) care preference was respected; patient's decisional conflict; quality of communication; family's decision-making confidence; family's anxiety and depression; and patients' and family members' satisfaction of the intervention. Outcomes of the two groups will be compared using regressions and linear mixed-effects models.

Discussion: This study will provide rigorous scientific evidence on the effectiveness of a structured and well-design family-supported, patient-centred ACP programme for adult palliative care patients and their family members in the hospital setting. If the ACP-Family proves to be effective, it will provide a structured and systematic approach to facilitate ACP discussions involving family members. This will respond to local needs and inform international ACP practice.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05935540.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
Communication about incurable illness and remaining life between spouses and patients with incurable illness receiving specialized home care: effects of a family caregiver-targeted web-based psycho-educational intervention. Correction: Adapting the serious illness conversation guide for unhoused older adults: a rapid qualitative study. Online education in palliative care - A national exploratory multimethod study. The family talk intervention prevent the feeling of loneliness - a long term follow up after a parents life-threatening illness. Is the use of antibiotic stewardship measures in the context of specialized outpatient palliative care sensible and feasible? An interview-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1