剖宫产后选择阴道分娩的障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统综述。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104927
Jingjing Jiang , Simin Zhuang , Xin Zhang , Xueping Liang , Cunmei Tan , Jin Liu , Rongjing Yuan , Ke Zhang , Yuxuan Feng , Wei Fan , Yanhong Wang
{"title":"剖宫产后选择阴道分娩的障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统综述。","authors":"Jingjing Jiang ,&nbsp;Simin Zhuang ,&nbsp;Xin Zhang ,&nbsp;Xueping Liang ,&nbsp;Cunmei Tan ,&nbsp;Jin Liu ,&nbsp;Rongjing Yuan ,&nbsp;Ke Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuxuan Feng ,&nbsp;Wei Fan ,&nbsp;Yanhong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaginal birth after cesarean is an effective way of reducing cesarean section rates and preventing a variety of short- and long-term complications associated with cesarean deliveries. Additionally, vaginal birth after cesarean can enhance breastfeeding rates, expedite postpartum recovery, and minimize hospitalization duration for women. Despite these benefits, the prevalence of vaginal birth after cesarean remains low in many countries, and only limited reviews have investigated the factors contributing to the low vaginal birth after cesarean rates.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This review aims to explore the barriers and facilitators influencing decision-making during the process of vaginal birth after cesarean.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A mixed-methods systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten electronic databases were systematically and comprehensively searched for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. Two reviewers critically appraised the eligible studies independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. We converted quantitative findings to narrative form and employed a convergent synthesis design to synthesize the data thematically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This review included 55 studies published between 2002 and 2024. These studies originated from 19 countries and comprised 21 quantitative studies, 31 qualitative studies, and three mixed-methods studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed as moderate to high. We divided the barriers and facilitators influencing vaginal birth after cesarean decision-making into four categories and nine subcategories: individual factors of pregnant women (sociodemographic characteristics, physiological factors, cognition, and psychological factors); interpersonal relationships (emotional support and communication); healthcare system factors (healthcare professionals' acceptance and commitment to action as well as healthcare facilities); and social factors (culture and ethnicity, along with law and policy).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study broadens the understanding of the various factors that influence vaginal birth after cesarean decisions and may provide valuable insights for future modifications in vaginal birth after cesarean practices to enhance its availability for women. We conclude that successful implementation of vaginal birth after cesarean requires the concerted efforts of all stakeholders. Hospitals should improve the quality of care, enhance the capacity of the healthcare system to support vaginal birth after cesarean, and respect the preferences of pregnant women by providing support and encouraging their active participation in decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO on June 24, 2022 (CRD42022339434).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104927"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators of choosing a vaginal birth after cesarean: A mixed-methods systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Jiang ,&nbsp;Simin Zhuang ,&nbsp;Xin Zhang ,&nbsp;Xueping Liang ,&nbsp;Cunmei Tan ,&nbsp;Jin Liu ,&nbsp;Rongjing Yuan ,&nbsp;Ke Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuxuan Feng ,&nbsp;Wei Fan ,&nbsp;Yanhong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaginal birth after cesarean is an effective way of reducing cesarean section rates and preventing a variety of short- and long-term complications associated with cesarean deliveries. Additionally, vaginal birth after cesarean can enhance breastfeeding rates, expedite postpartum recovery, and minimize hospitalization duration for women. Despite these benefits, the prevalence of vaginal birth after cesarean remains low in many countries, and only limited reviews have investigated the factors contributing to the low vaginal birth after cesarean rates.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This review aims to explore the barriers and facilitators influencing decision-making during the process of vaginal birth after cesarean.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A mixed-methods systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten electronic databases were systematically and comprehensively searched for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. Two reviewers critically appraised the eligible studies independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. We converted quantitative findings to narrative form and employed a convergent synthesis design to synthesize the data thematically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This review included 55 studies published between 2002 and 2024. These studies originated from 19 countries and comprised 21 quantitative studies, 31 qualitative studies, and three mixed-methods studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed as moderate to high. We divided the barriers and facilitators influencing vaginal birth after cesarean decision-making into four categories and nine subcategories: individual factors of pregnant women (sociodemographic characteristics, physiological factors, cognition, and psychological factors); interpersonal relationships (emotional support and communication); healthcare system factors (healthcare professionals' acceptance and commitment to action as well as healthcare facilities); and social factors (culture and ethnicity, along with law and policy).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study broadens the understanding of the various factors that influence vaginal birth after cesarean decisions and may provide valuable insights for future modifications in vaginal birth after cesarean practices to enhance its availability for women. We conclude that successful implementation of vaginal birth after cesarean requires the concerted efforts of all stakeholders. Hospitals should improve the quality of care, enhance the capacity of the healthcare system to support vaginal birth after cesarean, and respect the preferences of pregnant women by providing support and encouraging their active participation in decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO on June 24, 2022 (CRD42022339434).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002402\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产后阴道分娩是降低剖宫产率、预防与剖宫产相关的各种短期和长期并发症的有效方法。此外,剖宫产后阴道分娩还能提高母乳喂养率,加快产后恢复,缩短产妇住院时间。尽管有这些好处,但在许多国家,剖宫产后经阴道分娩的比例仍然很低,而且只有有限的综述调查了导致剖宫产后经阴道分娩比例低的因素:本综述旨在探讨剖宫产后阴道分娩过程中影响决策的障碍和促进因素:设计:混合方法系统综述:系统、全面地检索了十个电子数据库中的定性、定量和混合方法研究。两名审稿人使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的批判性评估工具对符合条件的研究进行了独立的批判性评估。我们将定量研究结果转换为叙述形式,并采用聚合综合设计对数据进行专题综合:本综述包括 2002 年至 2024 年间发表的 55 项研究。这些研究来自 19 个国家,包括 21 项定量研究、31 项定性研究和 3 项混合方法研究。所纳入研究的方法质量被评定为中高。我们将影响剖宫产后阴道分娩决策的障碍和促进因素分为四类九小类:孕妇个体因素(社会人口学特征、生理因素、认知和心理因素);人际关系(情感支持和沟通);医疗保健系统因素(医疗保健专业人员的接受度和行动承诺以及医疗保健设施);社会因素(文化和种族以及法律和政策):本研究拓宽了人们对影响剖宫产后阴道分娩决定的各种因素的认识,并为今后修改剖宫产后阴道分娩的做法提供了宝贵的见解,以提高妇女的可及性。我们的结论是,成功实施剖宫产后阴道分娩需要所有利益相关者的共同努力。医院应提高护理质量,增强医疗系统支持剖宫产后阴道分娩的能力,并通过提供支持和鼓励孕妇积极参与决策来尊重孕妇的意愿:本系统综述于 2022 年 6 月 24 日在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42022339434)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and facilitators of choosing a vaginal birth after cesarean: A mixed-methods systematic review

Background

Vaginal birth after cesarean is an effective way of reducing cesarean section rates and preventing a variety of short- and long-term complications associated with cesarean deliveries. Additionally, vaginal birth after cesarean can enhance breastfeeding rates, expedite postpartum recovery, and minimize hospitalization duration for women. Despite these benefits, the prevalence of vaginal birth after cesarean remains low in many countries, and only limited reviews have investigated the factors contributing to the low vaginal birth after cesarean rates.

Objectives

This review aims to explore the barriers and facilitators influencing decision-making during the process of vaginal birth after cesarean.

Design

A mixed-methods systematic review.

Methods

Ten electronic databases were systematically and comprehensively searched for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. Two reviewers critically appraised the eligible studies independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. We converted quantitative findings to narrative form and employed a convergent synthesis design to synthesize the data thematically.

Results

This review included 55 studies published between 2002 and 2024. These studies originated from 19 countries and comprised 21 quantitative studies, 31 qualitative studies, and three mixed-methods studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed as moderate to high. We divided the barriers and facilitators influencing vaginal birth after cesarean decision-making into four categories and nine subcategories: individual factors of pregnant women (sociodemographic characteristics, physiological factors, cognition, and psychological factors); interpersonal relationships (emotional support and communication); healthcare system factors (healthcare professionals' acceptance and commitment to action as well as healthcare facilities); and social factors (culture and ethnicity, along with law and policy).

Conclusions

This study broadens the understanding of the various factors that influence vaginal birth after cesarean decisions and may provide valuable insights for future modifications in vaginal birth after cesarean practices to enhance its availability for women. We conclude that successful implementation of vaginal birth after cesarean requires the concerted efforts of all stakeholders. Hospitals should improve the quality of care, enhance the capacity of the healthcare system to support vaginal birth after cesarean, and respect the preferences of pregnant women by providing support and encouraging their active participation in decision-making.

Registration

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO on June 24, 2022 (CRD42022339434).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "The effects of a facilitator-enabled online multicomponent iSupport for dementia programme: A multicentre randomised controlled trial" [Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 159 (2024) 104868]. Benefits of an educational intervention on functional capacity in community-dwelling older adults with frailty phenotype: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of serious fall injuries among older inpatients: A secondary analysis of multicenter cross-sectional administrative data. Comment on Raya-Benítez et al. (2024) 'Effectiveness of non-instrumental early mobilization to reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients' Comment on Tan et al. (2024) 'Interventions to promote readiness for advance care planning: A systematic review and meta-analysis'
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1