完善实施研究逻辑模型:引文分析、用户调查和范围审查协议。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1490764
James L Merle, Elizabeth A Sloss, Olutobi A Sanuade, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Rosemary Meza, Caitlin Golden, Rebecca G Simmons, Alicia Velazquez, Jennie L Hill, Paul A Estabrooks, Mary M McFarland, Miriam R Rafferty, Dennis H Li, Justin D Smith
{"title":"完善实施研究逻辑模型:引文分析、用户调查和范围审查协议。","authors":"James L Merle, Elizabeth A Sloss, Olutobi A Sanuade, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Rosemary Meza, Caitlin Golden, Rebecca G Simmons, Alicia Velazquez, Jennie L Hill, Paul A Estabrooks, Mary M McFarland, Miriam R Rafferty, Dennis H Li, Justin D Smith","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1490764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Implementation Research Logic Model (IRLM) aids users in combining, organizing, and specifying the relationships between important constructs in implementation research. The goal of the IRLM is to improve the rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of implementation research projects. The article describing the IRLM was published September 25, 2020 (<i>Implement Sci</i>, Vol 15); it has since been highly cited and included as a required element in multiple funding opportunity announcements from federal agencies. The proliferation of IRLM use across dissemination and implementation research projects and practice provides an excellent opportunity to examine applications across a variety of different contexts. This protocol will result in a description of the impact of the IRLM on the field of dissemination and implementation science and guidance on refinements to the IRLM to increase its utility and impact through (1) a citation analysis, (2) a scoping review, and (3) user surveys and interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review reporting guidelines (PRISMA-ScR). We plan to conduct a citation search and analysis of the Smith et al. 2020 article and a scoping review. The review search will be conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, APA PsycINFO4, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection., and grey literature will be searched to identify studies that use alternative logic models for implementation research. A survey will be developed from the findings of the scoping review and administered to individuals who used the IRLM. Semi-structured interviews will then be conducted with a sample of survey respondents to provide an opportunity for sequential mixed-methods analysis to achieve a deeper understanding of needed IRLM refinements and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethics approval for the scoping review and citation analysis is not applicable as only data from published literature will be used and no original data will be collected. For the survey, IRB will be completed once items are developed from the results of the scoping review and citation analysis. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and via online tools.</p><p><strong>Registration details: </strong>This protocol was registered with OSF, https://osf.io/y94bj (1).</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1490764"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining the implementation research logic model: a citation analysis, user survey, and scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"James L Merle, Elizabeth A Sloss, Olutobi A Sanuade, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Rosemary Meza, Caitlin Golden, Rebecca G Simmons, Alicia Velazquez, Jennie L Hill, Paul A Estabrooks, Mary M McFarland, Miriam R Rafferty, Dennis H Li, Justin D Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2024.1490764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Implementation Research Logic Model (IRLM) aids users in combining, organizing, and specifying the relationships between important constructs in implementation research. The goal of the IRLM is to improve the rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of implementation research projects. The article describing the IRLM was published September 25, 2020 (<i>Implement Sci</i>, Vol 15); it has since been highly cited and included as a required element in multiple funding opportunity announcements from federal agencies. The proliferation of IRLM use across dissemination and implementation research projects and practice provides an excellent opportunity to examine applications across a variety of different contexts. This protocol will result in a description of the impact of the IRLM on the field of dissemination and implementation science and guidance on refinements to the IRLM to increase its utility and impact through (1) a citation analysis, (2) a scoping review, and (3) user surveys and interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review reporting guidelines (PRISMA-ScR). We plan to conduct a citation search and analysis of the Smith et al. 2020 article and a scoping review. The review search will be conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, APA PsycINFO4, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection., and grey literature will be searched to identify studies that use alternative logic models for implementation research. A survey will be developed from the findings of the scoping review and administered to individuals who used the IRLM. Semi-structured interviews will then be conducted with a sample of survey respondents to provide an opportunity for sequential mixed-methods analysis to achieve a deeper understanding of needed IRLM refinements and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethics approval for the scoping review and citation analysis is not applicable as only data from published literature will be used and no original data will be collected. For the survey, IRB will be completed once items are developed from the results of the scoping review and citation analysis. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and via online tools.</p><p><strong>Registration details: </strong>This protocol was registered with OSF, https://osf.io/y94bj (1).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1490764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1490764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1490764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:实施研究逻辑模型(IRLM)可帮助用户组合、组织和明确实施研究中重要构造之间的关系。实施研究逻辑模型的目标是提高实施研究项目的严谨性、可重复性和透明度。介绍 IRLM 的文章于 2020 年 9 月 25 日发表(Implement Sci,第 15 卷);自此以后,IRLM 被大量引用,并被联邦机构列为多个资助机会公告中的必备要素。IRLM 在传播与实施研究项目和实践中的广泛应用,为研究各种不同背景下的应用提供了绝佳机会。本协议将通过(1)引文分析、(2)范围审查以及(3)用户调查和访谈,描述IRLM对传播与实施科学领域的影响,并就IRLM的改进提供指导,以提高其实用性和影响力:本方案遵循《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)扩展范围综述报告指南(PRISMA-ScR)。我们计划对 Smith 等人 2020 年的文章进行引文检索和分析,并进行范围界定综述。综述检索将在 Medline、Embase、CINAHL Complete、Cochrane Library、APA PsycINFO4、ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global、Scopus 和 Web of Science Core Collection 中进行,并将检索灰色文献,以确定在实施研究中使用替代逻辑模型的研究。将根据范围界定审查的结果编制一份调查表,并对使用过 IRLM 的个人进行调查。然后,将对调查对象进行抽样半结构式访谈,以便有机会进行连续的混合方法分析,从而更深入地了解所需的 IRLM 改进和建议:伦理和传播:由于只使用已发表文献中的数据,不收集原始数据,因此范围界定审查和引文分析的伦理审批不适用。至于调查,一旦根据范围界定审查和引文分析的结果制定了调查项目,将完成 IRB。调查结果将通过同行评议出版物、会议演讲和在线工具进行传播:本协议已在 OSF 注册,https://osf.io/y94bj (1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refining the implementation research logic model: a citation analysis, user survey, and scoping review protocol.

Introduction: The Implementation Research Logic Model (IRLM) aids users in combining, organizing, and specifying the relationships between important constructs in implementation research. The goal of the IRLM is to improve the rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of implementation research projects. The article describing the IRLM was published September 25, 2020 (Implement Sci, Vol 15); it has since been highly cited and included as a required element in multiple funding opportunity announcements from federal agencies. The proliferation of IRLM use across dissemination and implementation research projects and practice provides an excellent opportunity to examine applications across a variety of different contexts. This protocol will result in a description of the impact of the IRLM on the field of dissemination and implementation science and guidance on refinements to the IRLM to increase its utility and impact through (1) a citation analysis, (2) a scoping review, and (3) user surveys and interviews.

Methods and analysis: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review reporting guidelines (PRISMA-ScR). We plan to conduct a citation search and analysis of the Smith et al. 2020 article and a scoping review. The review search will be conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, APA PsycINFO4, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection., and grey literature will be searched to identify studies that use alternative logic models for implementation research. A survey will be developed from the findings of the scoping review and administered to individuals who used the IRLM. Semi-structured interviews will then be conducted with a sample of survey respondents to provide an opportunity for sequential mixed-methods analysis to achieve a deeper understanding of needed IRLM refinements and recommendations.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval for the scoping review and citation analysis is not applicable as only data from published literature will be used and no original data will be collected. For the survey, IRB will be completed once items are developed from the results of the scoping review and citation analysis. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and via online tools.

Registration details: This protocol was registered with OSF, https://osf.io/y94bj (1).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1