在 COVID-19 大流行期间通过远程康复提供物理治疗服务的经验调查。

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1486801
Tzu-Hsuan Peng, Janice J Eng, Anne Harris, Catherine Le Cornu Levett, Jennifer Yao, Amy Schneeberg, Courtney L Pollock
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间通过远程康复提供物理治疗服务的经验调查。","authors":"Tzu-Hsuan Peng, Janice J Eng, Anne Harris, Catherine Le Cornu Levett, Jennifer Yao, Amy Schneeberg, Courtney L Pollock","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1486801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physiotherapy services have been typically provided in-person since the profession usually involves a therapist providing hands-on assessment and treatments. The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to study physiotherapists' adaptation to telerehabilitation (phone or videoconference).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed: (1) to explore how physiotherapists adapted to the transition to delivering telerehabilitation, (2) to assess physiotherapists' perceptions of implementing telerehabilitation, and (3) to identify the challenges and facilitators of delivering telerehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used an online survey distributed to physiotherapists within a large Canadian health authority. Closed-ended questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five physiotherapists responded and data were collected. Compared prior to the pandemic to time during the pandemic, the use of a phone for delivering physiotherapy increased from 24.0% to 73.3% of physiotherapists while videoconference increased from 5.3% to 77.3%. Overall, the physiotherapists found videoconference to be a more effective delivery method than phone. Less than half felt that they could use videoconference to effectively treat pain (49.3%), upper extremity function (40.0%) or strength/range of motion (48.0%). Only 29.3% felt that they could effectively treat walking balance or mobility by videoconference. Technical barriers were identified with client comfort with the equipment reported by 90.7% of physiotherapists and positioning of the webcam by 76.0% of physiotherapists. A large proportion of physiotherapists agreed that they would continue the practice of telerehabilitation via phone (54.7%) and videoconference (68.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pandemic resulted in a dramatic shift to telerehabilitation for a profession that typically provides hands-on assessments and treatments. While there was increased uptake of telerehabilitation, many physiotherapists questioned their effectiveness using telerehabilitation to undertake activities that traditionally involve manual treatments or hands-on guidance/supervision. However, physiotherapists were committed to continuing telerehabilitation to meet patients' needs after the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"1486801"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of the experiences of delivering physiotherapy services through telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Tzu-Hsuan Peng, Janice J Eng, Anne Harris, Catherine Le Cornu Levett, Jennifer Yao, Amy Schneeberg, Courtney L Pollock\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2024.1486801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physiotherapy services have been typically provided in-person since the profession usually involves a therapist providing hands-on assessment and treatments. The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to study physiotherapists' adaptation to telerehabilitation (phone or videoconference).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed: (1) to explore how physiotherapists adapted to the transition to delivering telerehabilitation, (2) to assess physiotherapists' perceptions of implementing telerehabilitation, and (3) to identify the challenges and facilitators of delivering telerehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used an online survey distributed to physiotherapists within a large Canadian health authority. Closed-ended questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five physiotherapists responded and data were collected. Compared prior to the pandemic to time during the pandemic, the use of a phone for delivering physiotherapy increased from 24.0% to 73.3% of physiotherapists while videoconference increased from 5.3% to 77.3%. Overall, the physiotherapists found videoconference to be a more effective delivery method than phone. Less than half felt that they could use videoconference to effectively treat pain (49.3%), upper extremity function (40.0%) or strength/range of motion (48.0%). Only 29.3% felt that they could effectively treat walking balance or mobility by videoconference. Technical barriers were identified with client comfort with the equipment reported by 90.7% of physiotherapists and positioning of the webcam by 76.0% of physiotherapists. A large proportion of physiotherapists agreed that they would continue the practice of telerehabilitation via phone (54.7%) and videoconference (68.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pandemic resulted in a dramatic shift to telerehabilitation for a profession that typically provides hands-on assessments and treatments. While there was increased uptake of telerehabilitation, many physiotherapists questioned their effectiveness using telerehabilitation to undertake activities that traditionally involve manual treatments or hands-on guidance/supervision. However, physiotherapists were committed to continuing telerehabilitation to meet patients' needs after the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1486801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1486801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1486801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:物理治疗服务通常由治疗师亲自提供评估和治疗,因此物理治疗服务通常由治疗师亲自提供。COVID-19 大流行为研究物理治疗师对远程康复(电话或视频会议)的适应情况提供了机会:本研究旨在:(1)探讨物理治疗师如何适应向提供远程康复服务的转变;(2)评估物理治疗师对实施远程康复服务的看法;(3)确定提供远程康复服务所面临的挑战和促进因素:本研究采用了在线调查的方式,调查对象是加拿大一家大型医疗机构的物理治疗师。对封闭式问题进行了描述性统计分析:共有 75 名物理治疗师做出了回应并收集了数据。与大流行前和大流行期间相比,使用电话提供物理治疗的物理治疗师从 24.0% 增加到 73.3%,而视频会议从 5.3% 增加到 77.3%。总体而言,物理治疗师认为视频会议比电话更有效。不到一半的物理治疗师认为他们可以利用视频会议有效治疗疼痛(49.3%)、上肢功能(40.0%)或力量/运动范围(48.0%)。只有 29.3% 的人认为他们可以通过视频会议有效治疗行走平衡或移动能力。90.7%的物理治疗师认为客户对设备的舒适度存在技术障碍,76.0%的物理治疗师认为网络摄像头的定位存在技术障碍。大部分物理治疗师同意将继续通过电话(54.7%)和视频会议(68.0%)进行远程康复治疗:大流行导致物理治疗师这一通常提供实际评估和治疗的职业急剧转向远程康复。虽然采用远程康复技术的人数有所增加,但许多物理治疗师对使用远程康复技术开展传统上需要人工治疗或动手指导/监督的活动的有效性表示质疑。然而,物理治疗师致力于继续开展远程康复,以满足大流行病后患者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey of the experiences of delivering physiotherapy services through telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Physiotherapy services have been typically provided in-person since the profession usually involves a therapist providing hands-on assessment and treatments. The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to study physiotherapists' adaptation to telerehabilitation (phone or videoconference).

Objective: This study aimed: (1) to explore how physiotherapists adapted to the transition to delivering telerehabilitation, (2) to assess physiotherapists' perceptions of implementing telerehabilitation, and (3) to identify the challenges and facilitators of delivering telerehabilitation.

Methods: This study used an online survey distributed to physiotherapists within a large Canadian health authority. Closed-ended questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results: Seventy-five physiotherapists responded and data were collected. Compared prior to the pandemic to time during the pandemic, the use of a phone for delivering physiotherapy increased from 24.0% to 73.3% of physiotherapists while videoconference increased from 5.3% to 77.3%. Overall, the physiotherapists found videoconference to be a more effective delivery method than phone. Less than half felt that they could use videoconference to effectively treat pain (49.3%), upper extremity function (40.0%) or strength/range of motion (48.0%). Only 29.3% felt that they could effectively treat walking balance or mobility by videoconference. Technical barriers were identified with client comfort with the equipment reported by 90.7% of physiotherapists and positioning of the webcam by 76.0% of physiotherapists. A large proportion of physiotherapists agreed that they would continue the practice of telerehabilitation via phone (54.7%) and videoconference (68.0%).

Conclusion: The pandemic resulted in a dramatic shift to telerehabilitation for a profession that typically provides hands-on assessments and treatments. While there was increased uptake of telerehabilitation, many physiotherapists questioned their effectiveness using telerehabilitation to undertake activities that traditionally involve manual treatments or hands-on guidance/supervision. However, physiotherapists were committed to continuing telerehabilitation to meet patients' needs after the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Rehabilitation of a giant meniscus cyst with a mixed tear. Preliminary development and evaluation of a mechanical handwriting assistive device to support individuals with movement disorders. Caregiver perceptions of usual care home programs for persons with acquired brain injury: a qualitative descriptive study. Underutilization of coper/non-coper screening in anterior cruciate ligament injuries management in Italy: an online survey. Validation of a tri-axial accelerometer for measuring physical activity in patients with subacute stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1