用于下巴修复的 Hyamax® Monophasic Volumizer 皮肤填充剂:前瞻性、单中心、研究者对照、随机对照试验。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04489-x
Jiangmiao Xie, Yuwei Zhang, Nanze Yu, Wenyun Ting, Yanping Shi, Wei Zhang, Ling Tian, Lin Jin, Runzhu Liu, Ang Zeng, Xiao Long
{"title":"用于下巴修复的 Hyamax® Monophasic Volumizer 皮肤填充剂:前瞻性、单中心、研究者对照、随机对照试验。","authors":"Jiangmiao Xie, Yuwei Zhang, Nanze Yu, Wenyun Ting, Yanping Shi, Wei Zhang, Ling Tian, Lin Jin, Runzhu Liu, Ang Zeng, Xiao Long","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04489-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyamax® Monophasic Volumizer Dermal Fillers is a newly designed hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler for chin augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hyamax® Volumizer in the correction of chin retrusion in the 18-55-year-old Chinese population for 12 months after treatment. Participants were randomized (3:1) to receive Hyamax® Volumizer injection (n = 21) or no treatment (n = 7). Assessments included live and blinded evaluations by photographs on a chin retrusion scale (Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale), aesthetic improvement (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) by the subjects and independent evaluators, and safety follow-up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hyamax® Volumizer was superior in improving chin retrusion at 6 months with a GCRS response rate of 57.14% versus 0% of the controls (P<0.0001) meeting the primary effectiveness objective. The GCRS and GAIS scores by subjects and evaluators achieved remarkable improvement at all follow-up points compared with the control group through 12 months. Common ISRs were injection-site pain (90.48%), tenderness (80.95%), redness (47.62%) and ecchymosis (19.05%). No serious treatment-related advert events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hyamax® Volumizer significantly restored the facial volume and improved the chin projection with safety.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence i: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hyamax® Monophasic Volumizer Dermal Fillers for Chin Restoration: A Prospective, Single-Center, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jiangmiao Xie, Yuwei Zhang, Nanze Yu, Wenyun Ting, Yanping Shi, Wei Zhang, Ling Tian, Lin Jin, Runzhu Liu, Ang Zeng, Xiao Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-024-04489-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyamax® Monophasic Volumizer Dermal Fillers is a newly designed hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler for chin augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hyamax® Volumizer in the correction of chin retrusion in the 18-55-year-old Chinese population for 12 months after treatment. Participants were randomized (3:1) to receive Hyamax® Volumizer injection (n = 21) or no treatment (n = 7). Assessments included live and blinded evaluations by photographs on a chin retrusion scale (Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale), aesthetic improvement (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) by the subjects and independent evaluators, and safety follow-up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hyamax® Volumizer was superior in improving chin retrusion at 6 months with a GCRS response rate of 57.14% versus 0% of the controls (P<0.0001) meeting the primary effectiveness objective. The GCRS and GAIS scores by subjects and evaluators achieved remarkable improvement at all follow-up points compared with the control group through 12 months. Common ISRs were injection-site pain (90.48%), tenderness (80.95%), redness (47.62%) and ecchymosis (19.05%). No serious treatment-related advert events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hyamax® Volumizer significantly restored the facial volume and improved the chin projection with safety.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence i: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04489-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04489-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Hyamax® Monophasic Volumizer Dermal Fillers是一种新设计的用于隆下巴的透明质酸软组织填充剂:这项前瞻性、单中心、评估者盲法随机对照研究旨在评估 Hyamax® Volumizer 在治疗后 12 个月内矫正 18-55 岁中国人下巴后缩的有效性和安全性。参与者以 3:1 的比例随机分配接受 Hyamax® 隆下巴针注射(21 人)或不接受治疗(7 人)。评估包括通过照片对下巴后缩量表(Galderma下巴后缩量表)、受试者和独立评估者的美学改善(全球美学改善量表)以及3、6、9和12个月的安全性随访进行现场盲评:结果:6 个月后,Hyamax® 丰下巴器在改善下巴后缩方面更胜一筹,GCRS 反应率为 57.14%,而对照组为 0%(PC 结论:Hyamax® 丰下巴器在改善下巴后缩方面更胜一筹:Hyamax®玻尿酸注射器能明显恢复面部容积,改善下巴后缩,安全性高:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整说明,请参阅目录或在线作者须知 www.springer.com/00266 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hyamax® Monophasic Volumizer Dermal Fillers for Chin Restoration: A Prospective, Single-Center, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Hyamax® Monophasic Volumizer Dermal Fillers is a newly designed hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler for chin augmentation.

Methods: A prospective, single-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hyamax® Volumizer in the correction of chin retrusion in the 18-55-year-old Chinese population for 12 months after treatment. Participants were randomized (3:1) to receive Hyamax® Volumizer injection (n = 21) or no treatment (n = 7). Assessments included live and blinded evaluations by photographs on a chin retrusion scale (Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale), aesthetic improvement (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) by the subjects and independent evaluators, and safety follow-up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Results: Hyamax® Volumizer was superior in improving chin retrusion at 6 months with a GCRS response rate of 57.14% versus 0% of the controls (P<0.0001) meeting the primary effectiveness objective. The GCRS and GAIS scores by subjects and evaluators achieved remarkable improvement at all follow-up points compared with the control group through 12 months. Common ISRs were injection-site pain (90.48%), tenderness (80.95%), redness (47.62%) and ecchymosis (19.05%). No serious treatment-related advert events were reported.

Conclusion: Hyamax® Volumizer significantly restored the facial volume and improved the chin projection with safety.

Level of evidence i: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review to Explore the Role of Industry and Regulators on Minimally Invasive Aesthetics Education: A Tale of Two Cities. Comparative Analysis of Cellulite Treatment Modalities: A Systematic Review. Exploring Global Trends in Skin Grafting Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric and Visual Analysis (1870-2023). Effectiveness and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Chin Augmentation and Correction of Chin Retrusion: A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. Global Trends in 3D Printing Research in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Key Contributors, Hotspots, and Emerging Topics Based on Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1