胃部超声波检查时间和难度:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1111/anae.16472
Mark G Filipovic, Sascha J Baettig, Monika Hebeisen, Roman Meierhans, Michael T Ganter
{"title":"胃部超声波检查时间和难度:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Mark G Filipovic, Sascha J Baettig, Monika Hebeisen, Roman Meierhans, Michael T Ganter","doi":"10.1111/anae.16472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point-of-care gastric ultrasound is an emerging tool in peri-operative practice. However, data on the technical challenges of gastric ultrasound, which are essential for optimised training, remain scarce. We analysed gastric ultrasound examinations performed after basic training to identify factors associated with difficulty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an analysis of data from a prospective observational study evaluating the potential impact of routine pre-operative gastric ultrasound on peri-operative management in adult patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery at a single centre. Before initiation, physicians received extensive structured training with at least 30 supervised gastric sonograms before independent practice. We then used regression models to identify factors associated with deviation from a predefined sonography algorithm, performance time and scan difficulty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three trained physicians performed 2003 ultrasound scans. Median (IQR [range]) performance time was 5 (4-6 [1-20]) min, which was achieved after 20-27 scans following structured training. Patient characteristics associated with more difficult and longer duration scans were: increase in BMI per 5 kg.m<sup>-2</sup> (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.57 (1.35-1.83), p < 0.001 for difficulty and percentage change coefficient (95%CI) 1.03 (1.02-1.05), p < 0.001 for duration); and male sex (odds ratio (95%CI) 3.31 (2.28-4.88), p < 0.001 for difficulty and percentage change coefficient (95%CI) 1.08 (1.04-1.12), p < 0.001, for duration). Trauma surgery (odds ratio (95%CI) 3.26 (1.88-5.68), p < 0.001), ASA physical status of 3 or 4 (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.86 (1.21-2.88), p = 0.0049) and emergency surgery (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.86 (1.20-2.89), p = 0.006) were associated with deviation from the predefined sonography algorithm.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Approximately 50 scans are required to achieve a baseline performance of 5 min per gastric ultrasound. Future training programmes should focus on patients with obesity, male sex, higher ASA physical status and trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastric ultrasound performance time and difficulty: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Mark G Filipovic, Sascha J Baettig, Monika Hebeisen, Roman Meierhans, Michael T Ganter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point-of-care gastric ultrasound is an emerging tool in peri-operative practice. However, data on the technical challenges of gastric ultrasound, which are essential for optimised training, remain scarce. We analysed gastric ultrasound examinations performed after basic training to identify factors associated with difficulty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an analysis of data from a prospective observational study evaluating the potential impact of routine pre-operative gastric ultrasound on peri-operative management in adult patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery at a single centre. Before initiation, physicians received extensive structured training with at least 30 supervised gastric sonograms before independent practice. We then used regression models to identify factors associated with deviation from a predefined sonography algorithm, performance time and scan difficulty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three trained physicians performed 2003 ultrasound scans. Median (IQR [range]) performance time was 5 (4-6 [1-20]) min, which was achieved after 20-27 scans following structured training. Patient characteristics associated with more difficult and longer duration scans were: increase in BMI per 5 kg.m<sup>-2</sup> (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.57 (1.35-1.83), p < 0.001 for difficulty and percentage change coefficient (95%CI) 1.03 (1.02-1.05), p < 0.001 for duration); and male sex (odds ratio (95%CI) 3.31 (2.28-4.88), p < 0.001 for difficulty and percentage change coefficient (95%CI) 1.08 (1.04-1.12), p < 0.001, for duration). Trauma surgery (odds ratio (95%CI) 3.26 (1.88-5.68), p < 0.001), ASA physical status of 3 or 4 (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.86 (1.21-2.88), p = 0.0049) and emergency surgery (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.86 (1.20-2.89), p = 0.006) were associated with deviation from the predefined sonography algorithm.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Approximately 50 scans are required to achieve a baseline performance of 5 min per gastric ultrasound. Future training programmes should focus on patients with obesity, male sex, higher ASA physical status and trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16472\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16472","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介护理点胃部超声是围手术期实践中的一种新兴工具。然而,有关胃部超声技术挑战的数据仍然很少,而这些数据对于优化培训至关重要。我们对基础培训后进行的胃部超声检查进行了分析,以确定与困难相关的因素:这是一项前瞻性观察研究的数据分析,该研究评估了常规术前胃部超声波检查对在一个中心接受择期手术或急诊手术的成年患者围手术期管理的潜在影响。在开始实施前,医生们接受了广泛的结构化培训,在独立实践前至少进行了 30 次有指导的胃超声检查。然后,我们使用回归模型确定了与偏离预先定义的超声造影算法、操作时间和扫描难度相关的因素:73名经过培训的医生进行了2003次超声扫描。中位(IQR [范围])操作时间为 5(4-6 [1-20])分钟,这是在经过结构化培训后进行 20-27 次扫描后达到的。与扫描难度增加和持续时间延长相关的患者特征有:体重指数每增加 5 kg.m-2 (几率比(95%CI)为 1.57 (1.35-1.83),p 讨论:大约需要 50 次扫描才能达到每次胃部超声检查 5 分钟的基准性能。未来的培训计划应侧重于肥胖、男性、ASA 身体状况较好和外伤患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gastric ultrasound performance time and difficulty: a prospective observational study.

Introduction: Point-of-care gastric ultrasound is an emerging tool in peri-operative practice. However, data on the technical challenges of gastric ultrasound, which are essential for optimised training, remain scarce. We analysed gastric ultrasound examinations performed after basic training to identify factors associated with difficulty.

Methods: This was an analysis of data from a prospective observational study evaluating the potential impact of routine pre-operative gastric ultrasound on peri-operative management in adult patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery at a single centre. Before initiation, physicians received extensive structured training with at least 30 supervised gastric sonograms before independent practice. We then used regression models to identify factors associated with deviation from a predefined sonography algorithm, performance time and scan difficulty.

Results: Seventy-three trained physicians performed 2003 ultrasound scans. Median (IQR [range]) performance time was 5 (4-6 [1-20]) min, which was achieved after 20-27 scans following structured training. Patient characteristics associated with more difficult and longer duration scans were: increase in BMI per 5 kg.m-2 (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.57 (1.35-1.83), p < 0.001 for difficulty and percentage change coefficient (95%CI) 1.03 (1.02-1.05), p < 0.001 for duration); and male sex (odds ratio (95%CI) 3.31 (2.28-4.88), p < 0.001 for difficulty and percentage change coefficient (95%CI) 1.08 (1.04-1.12), p < 0.001, for duration). Trauma surgery (odds ratio (95%CI) 3.26 (1.88-5.68), p < 0.001), ASA physical status of 3 or 4 (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.86 (1.21-2.88), p = 0.0049) and emergency surgery (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.86 (1.20-2.89), p = 0.006) were associated with deviation from the predefined sonography algorithm.

Discussion: Approximately 50 scans are required to achieve a baseline performance of 5 min per gastric ultrasound. Future training programmes should focus on patients with obesity, male sex, higher ASA physical status and trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Influence of the type of anaesthesia on acute kidney injury after nephrectomy: a randomised controlled trial Augmented reality laryngoscopy and ergonomics: a different stance Efficacy of high‐flow nasal oxygenation during induction of general anaesthesia in parturients living with obesity: a two‐centre, prospective, randomised clinical trial Association between self-reported pain experiences in hospital and ratings of care, readmission and emergency department visits: a population-based study from New South Wales, Australia Regional anaesthesia research priorities: a Regional Anaesthesia UK (RA-UK) priority setting partnership involving patients, carers and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1