血红蛋白病患者血型配型的红细胞规格:来自国际输血医学指南合作组织的最新系统综述和临床实践指南。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY British Journal of Haematology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1111/bjh.19837
Julia Wolf, Isabelle Blais-Normandin, Aarti Bathla, Homa Keshavarz, Stella T Chou, Arwa Z Al-Riyami, Cassandra D Josephson, Edwin Massey, Heather A Hume, Jacob Pendergrast, Gregory Denomme, Rada M Grubovic Rastvorceva, Sara Trompeter, Simon J Stanworth
{"title":"血红蛋白病患者血型配型的红细胞规格:来自国际输血医学指南合作组织的最新系统综述和临床实践指南。","authors":"Julia Wolf, Isabelle Blais-Normandin, Aarti Bathla, Homa Keshavarz, Stella T Chou, Arwa Z Al-Riyami, Cassandra D Josephson, Edwin Massey, Heather A Hume, Jacob Pendergrast, Gregory Denomme, Rada M Grubovic Rastvorceva, Sara Trompeter, Simon J Stanworth","doi":"10.1111/bjh.19837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Red blood cell (RBC) antigen matching beyond ABO and RhD is commonly recommended for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassaemia. We present an updated systematic literature review to inform evidence-based guidelines on RBC matching. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to develop recommendations. Six new observational studies (4 prospective, 2 retrospective) were identified. The six studies reported on 583 patients in total, including cross-over designs, with sample sizes from 10 to 343. Studies were heterogeneous, utilising varying degrees of RBC matching and different definitions for 'extended' matching. All reported on alloimmunisation. One study reported on molecular matching. The reported prevalence of alloimmunisation using limited matching was 0%-50% and with extended matching was 0%-24%. Eighty-two patients were alloimmunised before study entry. The risk of bias across studies was moderate to critical. The guideline panel recommends that ABO, RhDCcEe, and K-compatible RBCs are selected for individuals with SCD and thalassaemia, even in the absence of alloantibodies, and that RBCs which are antigen-negative to already existing clinically significant antibodies are chosen. There is a need for comparative research to define the benefit, impact, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility of extended RBC matching strategies to prevent alloimmunisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Red cell specifications for blood group matching in patients with haemoglobinopathies: An updated systematic review and clinical practice guideline from the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Wolf, Isabelle Blais-Normandin, Aarti Bathla, Homa Keshavarz, Stella T Chou, Arwa Z Al-Riyami, Cassandra D Josephson, Edwin Massey, Heather A Hume, Jacob Pendergrast, Gregory Denomme, Rada M Grubovic Rastvorceva, Sara Trompeter, Simon J Stanworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.19837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Red blood cell (RBC) antigen matching beyond ABO and RhD is commonly recommended for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassaemia. We present an updated systematic literature review to inform evidence-based guidelines on RBC matching. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to develop recommendations. Six new observational studies (4 prospective, 2 retrospective) were identified. The six studies reported on 583 patients in total, including cross-over designs, with sample sizes from 10 to 343. Studies were heterogeneous, utilising varying degrees of RBC matching and different definitions for 'extended' matching. All reported on alloimmunisation. One study reported on molecular matching. The reported prevalence of alloimmunisation using limited matching was 0%-50% and with extended matching was 0%-24%. Eighty-two patients were alloimmunised before study entry. The risk of bias across studies was moderate to critical. The guideline panel recommends that ABO, RhDCcEe, and K-compatible RBCs are selected for individuals with SCD and thalassaemia, even in the absence of alloantibodies, and that RBCs which are antigen-negative to already existing clinically significant antibodies are chosen. There is a need for comparative research to define the benefit, impact, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility of extended RBC matching strategies to prevent alloimmunisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19837\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

镰状细胞病(SCD)和地中海贫血症患者通常建议进行 ABO 和 RhD 以外的红细胞(RBC)抗原配型。我们提交了一份最新的系统性文献综述,为有关红细胞配型的循证指南提供依据。我们采用了建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具来制定建议。确定了六项新的观察性研究(4 项前瞻性研究,2 项回顾性研究)。这六项研究共报告了 583 例患者,包括交叉设计,样本量从 10 例到 343 例不等。这些研究各不相同,采用了不同程度的红细胞匹配和不同的 "扩展 "匹配定义。所有研究都报告了同种免疫情况。一项研究报告了分子配型。据报道,采用有限匹配的同种异体免疫发生率为 0%-50%,而采用扩展匹配的同种异体免疫发生率为 0%-24%。82名患者在进入研究前已进行了同种免疫。各项研究的偏倚风险为中度至严重偏倚。指导小组建议,即使在没有同种抗体的情况下,也应为 SCD 和地中海贫血患者选择 ABO、RhDCcEe 和 K 相容的 RBC,并选择对已存在的临床重要抗体抗原阴性的 RBC。有必要进行比较研究,以确定扩大红细胞配型策略的益处、影响、成本效益和可行性,从而预防同种免疫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Red cell specifications for blood group matching in patients with haemoglobinopathies: An updated systematic review and clinical practice guideline from the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines.

Red blood cell (RBC) antigen matching beyond ABO and RhD is commonly recommended for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassaemia. We present an updated systematic literature review to inform evidence-based guidelines on RBC matching. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to develop recommendations. Six new observational studies (4 prospective, 2 retrospective) were identified. The six studies reported on 583 patients in total, including cross-over designs, with sample sizes from 10 to 343. Studies were heterogeneous, utilising varying degrees of RBC matching and different definitions for 'extended' matching. All reported on alloimmunisation. One study reported on molecular matching. The reported prevalence of alloimmunisation using limited matching was 0%-50% and with extended matching was 0%-24%. Eighty-two patients were alloimmunised before study entry. The risk of bias across studies was moderate to critical. The guideline panel recommends that ABO, RhDCcEe, and K-compatible RBCs are selected for individuals with SCD and thalassaemia, even in the absence of alloantibodies, and that RBCs which are antigen-negative to already existing clinically significant antibodies are chosen. There is a need for comparative research to define the benefit, impact, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility of extended RBC matching strategies to prevent alloimmunisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of measurable residual disease for risk stratification and guiding allogeneic transplant in acute myeloid leukaemia patients with myelodysplasia-related mutations in first remission. Depression, sleep and pain affect instrumental activities of daily living through cognitive functioning in adults with sickle cell disease: A report from the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium. CD71+ erythroid cells promote multiple myeloma progression and impair anti-bacterial immune response. From old to new: Repurposed drugs in the battle towards curing sickle cell disease. Are we there yet? CAR-T therapy in multiple myeloma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1