COVID-19 期间心脏远程康复对心脏血流动力学和功能反应以及生活质量的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002235
Mostafa Dehghani, Mostafa Cheraghi, Amir Shakarami, Morteza Dehghani, Mehrdad Namdari
{"title":"COVID-19 期间心脏远程康复对心脏血流动力学和功能反应以及生活质量的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Mostafa Dehghani, Mostafa Cheraghi, Amir Shakarami, Morteza Dehghani, Mehrdad Namdari","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effects of a home-based cardiac telerehabilitation (HBCT) on cardiac hemodynamic and functional responses and health-related quality (HRQOL) of the patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled clinical trial, single-blinded. One hundred-fifty-five patients (mean age: 50.41±7.3 years, 41 women and 39 men) who underwent PCI were randomized into the two groups of intervention and control. The HBCT program included supervised exercise training, walking, phone calls, and a pedometer for 8 weeks. Hemodynamic changes, including systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), resting heart rate (HR<sub>rest</sub>), maximum heart rate (HR<sub>max</sub>), ejection fraction (EF), and rate pressure product (RPP), and functional parameters including the distance walked and metabolic equivalents (METS), also HRQOL were measured in all patients before and after the 8-week HBCT program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed significant reductions in SBP<sub>rest</sub> (126.82±9.17 vs. 131.27±10.24; <i>P</i> =0.044), DBP<sub>rest</sub> (87.4±5.39 vs. 89.17±7.33; <i>P</i>=0.027), HR<sub>rest</sub> (76.15±3.01 vs. 77.65±4.16; <i>P</i>=0.041), HR<sub>max</sub> (143.1±5.24 vs. 147.57±8.63; <i>P</i>=0.011), and RPP (9.64±0.81 vs. 10.07±0.99; <i>P</i>=0.007) and significant elevations in (45.75±4.31 vs. 43.5±5.21; <i>P</i>=0.039), distance walked (514.95±214.5 vs. 368.04±221.43; <i>P</i>=0.019), Mets (7.41±0.84 vs. 6.89±1.28; <i>P</i>=0.018), as well as HRQOL in the MCS (50.62±10.45 vs. 46.25±7.74; <i>P</i>=0.037), and HRQOL in the PCS (46.75±8.73 vs. 42.37±9.99; <i>P</i>=0.040) in the intervention group compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An HBCT program consisting of supervised exercise training significantly improved hemodynamic response, exercise performance capacity, and HRQOL in patients following PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"86 11","pages":"6537-6545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of cardiac telerehabilitation during COVID-19 on cardiac hemodynamic and functional responses and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Dehghani, Mostafa Cheraghi, Amir Shakarami, Morteza Dehghani, Mehrdad Namdari\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effects of a home-based cardiac telerehabilitation (HBCT) on cardiac hemodynamic and functional responses and health-related quality (HRQOL) of the patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled clinical trial, single-blinded. One hundred-fifty-five patients (mean age: 50.41±7.3 years, 41 women and 39 men) who underwent PCI were randomized into the two groups of intervention and control. The HBCT program included supervised exercise training, walking, phone calls, and a pedometer for 8 weeks. Hemodynamic changes, including systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), resting heart rate (HR<sub>rest</sub>), maximum heart rate (HR<sub>max</sub>), ejection fraction (EF), and rate pressure product (RPP), and functional parameters including the distance walked and metabolic equivalents (METS), also HRQOL were measured in all patients before and after the 8-week HBCT program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed significant reductions in SBP<sub>rest</sub> (126.82±9.17 vs. 131.27±10.24; <i>P</i> =0.044), DBP<sub>rest</sub> (87.4±5.39 vs. 89.17±7.33; <i>P</i>=0.027), HR<sub>rest</sub> (76.15±3.01 vs. 77.65±4.16; <i>P</i>=0.041), HR<sub>max</sub> (143.1±5.24 vs. 147.57±8.63; <i>P</i>=0.011), and RPP (9.64±0.81 vs. 10.07±0.99; <i>P</i>=0.007) and significant elevations in (45.75±4.31 vs. 43.5±5.21; <i>P</i>=0.039), distance walked (514.95±214.5 vs. 368.04±221.43; <i>P</i>=0.019), Mets (7.41±0.84 vs. 6.89±1.28; <i>P</i>=0.018), as well as HRQOL in the MCS (50.62±10.45 vs. 46.25±7.74; <i>P</i>=0.037), and HRQOL in the PCS (46.75±8.73 vs. 42.37±9.99; <i>P</i>=0.040) in the intervention group compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An HBCT program consisting of supervised exercise training significantly improved hemodynamic response, exercise performance capacity, and HRQOL in patients following PCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"86 11\",\"pages\":\"6537-6545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估基于家庭的心脏远程康复(HBCT)对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的心脏血流动力学和功能反应以及健康相关质量(HRQOL)的影响:本随机对照临床试验为单盲试验。接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 155 名患者(平均年龄:50.41±7.3 岁,女性 41 人,男性 39 人)被随机分为干预组和对照组。HBCT 计划包括为期 8 周的指导性运动训练、步行、电话和计步器。在为期 8 周的 HBCT 计划前后,对所有患者的血流动力学变化(包括收缩压 (SBP) 和舒张压 (DBP)、静息心率 (HRrest)、最大心率 (HRmax)、射血分数 (EF) 和率压乘积 (RPP))、功能参数(包括步行距离和代谢当量 (METS))以及 HRQOL 进行了测量:结果显示,SBPrest(126.82±9.17 vs. 131.27±10.24;P=0.044)、DBPrest(87.4±5.39 vs. 89.17±7.33;P=0.027)、HRrest(76.15±3.01 vs. 77.65±4.16;P=0.041)、HRmax(143.1±5.24 vs. 147.57±8.63;P=0.011)和 RPP(9.64±0.81 vs. 10.07±0.99;P=0.007)显著升高(45.75±4.31 vs. 43.5±5.21;P=0.039)、步行距离(514.95±214.5 vs. 368.04±221.43;P=0.019)、Mets(7.41±0.84 vs. 6.89±1.28;P=0.018)以及 HRQOL(50.62±10.45 vs. 46.25±7.74;P=0.037)和PCS的HRQOL(46.75±8.73 vs. 42.37±9.99;P=0.040):结论:由有指导的运动训练组成的 HBCT 项目能明显改善 PCI 患者的血流动力学反应、运动能力和 HRQOL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of cardiac telerehabilitation during COVID-19 on cardiac hemodynamic and functional responses and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effects of a home-based cardiac telerehabilitation (HBCT) on cardiac hemodynamic and functional responses and health-related quality (HRQOL) of the patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Materials and methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, single-blinded. One hundred-fifty-five patients (mean age: 50.41±7.3 years, 41 women and 39 men) who underwent PCI were randomized into the two groups of intervention and control. The HBCT program included supervised exercise training, walking, phone calls, and a pedometer for 8 weeks. Hemodynamic changes, including systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), resting heart rate (HRrest), maximum heart rate (HRmax), ejection fraction (EF), and rate pressure product (RPP), and functional parameters including the distance walked and metabolic equivalents (METS), also HRQOL were measured in all patients before and after the 8-week HBCT program.

Results: Our results showed significant reductions in SBPrest (126.82±9.17 vs. 131.27±10.24; P =0.044), DBPrest (87.4±5.39 vs. 89.17±7.33; P=0.027), HRrest (76.15±3.01 vs. 77.65±4.16; P=0.041), HRmax (143.1±5.24 vs. 147.57±8.63; P=0.011), and RPP (9.64±0.81 vs. 10.07±0.99; P=0.007) and significant elevations in (45.75±4.31 vs. 43.5±5.21; P=0.039), distance walked (514.95±214.5 vs. 368.04±221.43; P=0.019), Mets (7.41±0.84 vs. 6.89±1.28; P=0.018), as well as HRQOL in the MCS (50.62±10.45 vs. 46.25±7.74; P=0.037), and HRQOL in the PCS (46.75±8.73 vs. 42.37±9.99; P=0.040) in the intervention group compared to the control group.

Conclusion: An HBCT program consisting of supervised exercise training significantly improved hemodynamic response, exercise performance capacity, and HRQOL in patients following PCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
期刊最新文献
Hereditary multiple exostoses with cervical spine involvement: a case report: Retraction. Acalvaria, rare congenital malformation in Palestine: case report and literature review: Retraction. Influence of clinical experience in detecting calcifications of the head and neck region on panoramic radiographs: an app-based evaluation. Apple Vision Pro as an augmentative tool in surgery: a double-edged scalpel. Management of recurrent end-stage achalasia with robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1