颅颌面骨折手术中计算机辅助导航技术的应用:系统回顾

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004156
Jenna Thuman, Erika Andrade, Rebecca Brantley, Fernando A Herrera, Isis Raulino Scomacao
{"title":"颅颌面骨折手术中计算机辅助导航技术的应用:系统回顾","authors":"Jenna Thuman, Erika Andrade, Rebecca Brantley, Fernando A Herrera, Isis Raulino Scomacao","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of intraoperative computer-assisted navigation (iCAN) has been well-established in otolaryngology and neurosurgery; however, its use in surgical management of facial fractures is yet to be reported on a large scale. This study aimed to review the existing literature to determine the outcomes, limitations, risks, and benefits of iCAN use in facial fracture management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of iCAN use in craniomaxillofacial fracture surgery was performed by 2 authors in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search was conducted on 3 databases, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, using the search terms \"navigation,\" \"intraoperative,\" and \"brain lab\" in combination with \"facial fractures\" or \"facial reconstruction.\" Study type, demographics, fracture characteristics, surgery characteristics, iCAN devices, intraoperative fracture fixation accuracy, postoperative outcomes, complications, navigation limitations, and risks and benefits were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 909 studies identified in the initial search, of which 42 were chosen for final use. iCAN use was most commonly reported in unilateral (57.1%) and complex (50%) facial fracture cases. Surgical accuracy ranged from 0.7 to 4 mm and postoperative discrepancy ranged from 0.05 to 8 mm. Benefits included improved intraoperative surgical accuracy (95.2%), improved postoperative surgical discrepancy (52.4%), and decreased total surgical time (35.7%). Limitations reported with iCAN device use included operative technical difficulties (23.8%) and persistent systematic errors during device registration (21.4%). None of the studies discussed cost analysis or risks compared to conventional fixation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advancements in and increasing familiarity with iCAN technology have preliminarily shown favorable surgical outcomes in facial fracture fixation, which include improved operative accuracy and discrepancy and decreased surgical time.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of Computer-Assisted Navigation Technology Within Craniomaxillofacial Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jenna Thuman, Erika Andrade, Rebecca Brantley, Fernando A Herrera, Isis Raulino Scomacao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of intraoperative computer-assisted navigation (iCAN) has been well-established in otolaryngology and neurosurgery; however, its use in surgical management of facial fractures is yet to be reported on a large scale. This study aimed to review the existing literature to determine the outcomes, limitations, risks, and benefits of iCAN use in facial fracture management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of iCAN use in craniomaxillofacial fracture surgery was performed by 2 authors in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search was conducted on 3 databases, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, using the search terms \\\"navigation,\\\" \\\"intraoperative,\\\" and \\\"brain lab\\\" in combination with \\\"facial fractures\\\" or \\\"facial reconstruction.\\\" Study type, demographics, fracture characteristics, surgery characteristics, iCAN devices, intraoperative fracture fixation accuracy, postoperative outcomes, complications, navigation limitations, and risks and benefits were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 909 studies identified in the initial search, of which 42 were chosen for final use. iCAN use was most commonly reported in unilateral (57.1%) and complex (50%) facial fracture cases. Surgical accuracy ranged from 0.7 to 4 mm and postoperative discrepancy ranged from 0.05 to 8 mm. Benefits included improved intraoperative surgical accuracy (95.2%), improved postoperative surgical discrepancy (52.4%), and decreased total surgical time (35.7%). Limitations reported with iCAN device use included operative technical difficulties (23.8%) and persistent systematic errors during device registration (21.4%). None of the studies discussed cost analysis or risks compared to conventional fixation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advancements in and increasing familiarity with iCAN technology have preliminarily shown favorable surgical outcomes in facial fracture fixation, which include improved operative accuracy and discrepancy and decreased surgical time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术中计算机辅助导航(iCAN)已在耳鼻喉科和神经外科得到广泛应用,但其在面部骨折手术治疗中的应用尚未有大规模报道。本研究旨在回顾现有文献,以确定 iCAN 用于面部骨折治疗的结果、局限性、风险和益处:方法:两位作者根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,对 iCAN 在颅颌面骨折手术中的应用进行了系统综述。检索在 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Embase 3 个数据库中进行,检索词为 "导航"、"术中 "和 "脑实验室",并结合 "面部骨折 "或 "面部重建"。对研究类型、人口统计学、骨折特征、手术特征、iCAN设备、术中骨折固定准确性、术后结果、并发症、导航限制以及风险和益处进行了分析:据报道,iCAN 最常见于单侧(57.1%)和复杂(50%)面部骨折病例。手术精确度从 0.7 到 4 毫米不等,术后差异从 0.05 到 8 毫米不等。其优点包括提高了术中手术准确性(95.2%),改善了术后手术差异(52.4%),减少了总手术时间(35.7%)。据报道,使用 iCAN 设备的局限性包括手术技术困难(23.8%)和设备注册过程中持续出现系统误差(21.4%)。没有一项研究讨论了与传统固定方法相比的成本分析或风险:结论:iCAN 技术的进步和人们对该技术的日益熟悉初步显示了面部骨折固定术的良好手术效果,包括提高了手术准确性和差异,减少了手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilization of Computer-Assisted Navigation Technology Within Craniomaxillofacial Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Background: Use of intraoperative computer-assisted navigation (iCAN) has been well-established in otolaryngology and neurosurgery; however, its use in surgical management of facial fractures is yet to be reported on a large scale. This study aimed to review the existing literature to determine the outcomes, limitations, risks, and benefits of iCAN use in facial fracture management.

Methods: A systematic review of iCAN use in craniomaxillofacial fracture surgery was performed by 2 authors in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search was conducted on 3 databases, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, using the search terms "navigation," "intraoperative," and "brain lab" in combination with "facial fractures" or "facial reconstruction." Study type, demographics, fracture characteristics, surgery characteristics, iCAN devices, intraoperative fracture fixation accuracy, postoperative outcomes, complications, navigation limitations, and risks and benefits were analyzed.

Results: There were 909 studies identified in the initial search, of which 42 were chosen for final use. iCAN use was most commonly reported in unilateral (57.1%) and complex (50%) facial fracture cases. Surgical accuracy ranged from 0.7 to 4 mm and postoperative discrepancy ranged from 0.05 to 8 mm. Benefits included improved intraoperative surgical accuracy (95.2%), improved postoperative surgical discrepancy (52.4%), and decreased total surgical time (35.7%). Limitations reported with iCAN device use included operative technical difficulties (23.8%) and persistent systematic errors during device registration (21.4%). None of the studies discussed cost analysis or risks compared to conventional fixation methods.

Conclusions: Advancements in and increasing familiarity with iCAN technology have preliminarily shown favorable surgical outcomes in facial fracture fixation, which include improved operative accuracy and discrepancy and decreased surgical time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Changing Perspectives in Mastectomy: The Case for Nipple Preservation. Clinical Outcomes of Gender-Affirming Surgery in Individuals With Connective Tissue Disorders. Hourglass Constriction of a Single Fascicle of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve: A Case Report. Interprogram Differences in Core General, Core Plastic, and Plastic Surgery-Adjacent Training. Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1