儿科癌症幸存者及其家庭核心的创伤后应激障碍和症状:系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.805
Chen Ee Low, Sheryl Yen Pin Tan, Andre Loh, Jingrong Yu, Joel Zuo Er Ong, Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh, Chun En Yau, Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee, Cyrus Su Hui Ho
{"title":"儿科癌症幸存者及其家庭核心的创伤后应激障碍和症状:系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。","authors":"Chen Ee Low, Sheryl Yen Pin Tan, Andre Loh, Jingrong Yu, Joel Zuo Er Ong, Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh, Chun En Yau, Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee, Cyrus Su Hui Ho","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various studies have highlighted the increased incidence and symptoms of depression and anxiety in paediatric cancer survivors (PCS). Yet no meta-analysis has focused on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in PCS and their family nucleus.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the overall risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS in PCS and their family nucleus. Secondary objectives include identifying potential risk factors of PTSD and high PTSS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO for studies comparing the risk of PTSD and PTSS severity among PCS, their family nucleus and non-cancer controls. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1089 records, we included 21 studies. PCS have an increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.37-4.06) and decreased PTSS severity (standardised mean difference -0.29, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.08). Subgroup analyses of other categorical study-level characteristics revealed that female PCS who were older at diagnosis and data collection had a significantly higher risk of PTSD. Meta-regression were insignificant. Family nucleus did not show a significantly increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.59-5.00) and PTSS severity (standardised mean difference 0.53, 95% CI -0.00 to 1.06). Systematically reviewing studies on the family nucleus found that the majority reported a significantly increased risk of psychological trauma compared with the comparator. Lower education, income and social status were also risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Timely identification and interventions are imperative for policy makers and healthcare providers to prevent trauma from worsening in this population group.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 6","pages":"e207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-traumatic stress disorder and symptoms in paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.\",\"authors\":\"Chen Ee Low, Sheryl Yen Pin Tan, Andre Loh, Jingrong Yu, Joel Zuo Er Ong, Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh, Chun En Yau, Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee, Cyrus Su Hui Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2024.805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various studies have highlighted the increased incidence and symptoms of depression and anxiety in paediatric cancer survivors (PCS). Yet no meta-analysis has focused on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in PCS and their family nucleus.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the overall risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS in PCS and their family nucleus. Secondary objectives include identifying potential risk factors of PTSD and high PTSS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO for studies comparing the risk of PTSD and PTSS severity among PCS, their family nucleus and non-cancer controls. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1089 records, we included 21 studies. PCS have an increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.37-4.06) and decreased PTSS severity (standardised mean difference -0.29, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.08). Subgroup analyses of other categorical study-level characteristics revealed that female PCS who were older at diagnosis and data collection had a significantly higher risk of PTSD. Meta-regression were insignificant. Family nucleus did not show a significantly increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.59-5.00) and PTSS severity (standardised mean difference 0.53, 95% CI -0.00 to 1.06). Systematically reviewing studies on the family nucleus found that the majority reported a significantly increased risk of psychological trauma compared with the comparator. Lower education, income and social status were also risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Timely identification and interventions are imperative for policy makers and healthcare providers to prevent trauma from worsening in this population group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"e207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.805\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多项研究表明,儿童癌症幸存者(PCS)的抑郁症和焦虑症发病率和症状有所增加。目的:评估 PCS 及其家庭核心成员患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的总体风险和创伤后应激症状(PTSS)的严重程度。次要目标包括确定 PTSD 和高 PTSS 的潜在风险因素:我们系统地检索了PubMed、Embase和PsycINFO中关于比较PCS、其家庭核心成员和非癌症对照组中PTSD风险和PTSS严重程度的研究。研究遵循 PRISMA 报告指南。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归:从 1089 条记录中,我们纳入了 21 项研究。PCS增加了患创伤后应激障碍的风险(风险比为2.36,95% CI为1.37-4.06),降低了创伤后应激障碍的严重程度(标准化平均差为-0.29,95% CI为-0.50--0.08)。对其他分类研究特征的分组分析表明,在诊断和收集数据时年龄较大的女性 PCS 患创伤后应激障碍的风险明显较高。元回归结果不显著。家庭核心并没有显示 PTSD(风险比 1.13,95% CI 0.59-5.00)和 PTSS 严重程度(标准化平均差 0.53,95% CI -0.00 至 1.06)的风险明显增加。对有关家庭核心的研究进行系统回顾后发现,大多数研究报告称,与比较者相比,心理创伤的风险明显增加。教育程度、收入和社会地位较低也是风险因素:对于政策制定者和医疗服务提供者来说,及时识别和干预是防止这一人群心理创伤恶化的当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-traumatic stress disorder and symptoms in paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Background: Various studies have highlighted the increased incidence and symptoms of depression and anxiety in paediatric cancer survivors (PCS). Yet no meta-analysis has focused on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in PCS and their family nucleus.

Aims: To evaluate the overall risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS in PCS and their family nucleus. Secondary objectives include identifying potential risk factors of PTSD and high PTSS.

Method: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO for studies comparing the risk of PTSD and PTSS severity among PCS, their family nucleus and non-cancer controls. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted.

Results: From 1089 records, we included 21 studies. PCS have an increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.37-4.06) and decreased PTSS severity (standardised mean difference -0.29, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.08). Subgroup analyses of other categorical study-level characteristics revealed that female PCS who were older at diagnosis and data collection had a significantly higher risk of PTSD. Meta-regression were insignificant. Family nucleus did not show a significantly increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.59-5.00) and PTSS severity (standardised mean difference 0.53, 95% CI -0.00 to 1.06). Systematically reviewing studies on the family nucleus found that the majority reported a significantly increased risk of psychological trauma compared with the comparator. Lower education, income and social status were also risk factors.

Conclusions: Timely identification and interventions are imperative for policy makers and healthcare providers to prevent trauma from worsening in this population group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Comparing measurements of lithium treatment efficacy in people with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis - CORRIGENDUM. Factors associated with mental health outcomes in a Muslim community following the Christchurch terrorist attack. Breaking barriers in the career development of women in academic psychiatry. Cognitive, adaptive and daily life functioning in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Depression in childhood to early adulthood and respiratory health in early adulthood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1