验证电子健康记录中的哮喘恶化记录:系统性回顾协议。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088849
Elizabeth Moore, Zakariah Z Gassasse, Jennifer K Quint
{"title":"验证电子健康记录中的哮喘恶化记录:系统性回顾协议。","authors":"Elizabeth Moore, Zakariah Z Gassasse, Jennifer K Quint","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Asthma exacerbations or 'attacks' can vary in severity from mild worsening of symptoms to life-threatening changes that require urgent hospital care. Understanding these exacerbations is crucial to improving treatment and support for patients. Electronic health records (EHR) using anonymised data from people with asthma in primary and secondary care can be used to understand exacerbations and outcomes. However, previous studies found significant heterogeneity in the algorithms used to define asthma exacerbations. Validating definitions of asthma exacerbations in EHR will lead to more robust and comparable evidence in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Medline and Embase will be searched for the key concepts relating to asthma exacerbations, EHR and validation. All studies that validate exacerbations of asthma in EHR and administrative claims databases published before 30 May 2024 and written in English will be considered. Validated algorithms for asthma exacerbations or attacks must be compared against a reference or gold standard definition, and a measure of validity must be included. Articles will be screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers with any disagreements resolved by consensus or arbitration by a third reviewer. Study details will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be assessed using a QUADAS-2 tailored to this review.</p><p><strong>Ethics & dissemination: </strong>No ethical approval is required as this is a review of previously published literature. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal with the aim of being used in future research to help identify asthma exacerbation in EHR.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024545081.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the recording of exacerbations of asthma in electronic health records: a systematic review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Moore, Zakariah Z Gassasse, Jennifer K Quint\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Asthma exacerbations or 'attacks' can vary in severity from mild worsening of symptoms to life-threatening changes that require urgent hospital care. Understanding these exacerbations is crucial to improving treatment and support for patients. Electronic health records (EHR) using anonymised data from people with asthma in primary and secondary care can be used to understand exacerbations and outcomes. However, previous studies found significant heterogeneity in the algorithms used to define asthma exacerbations. Validating definitions of asthma exacerbations in EHR will lead to more robust and comparable evidence in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Medline and Embase will be searched for the key concepts relating to asthma exacerbations, EHR and validation. All studies that validate exacerbations of asthma in EHR and administrative claims databases published before 30 May 2024 and written in English will be considered. Validated algorithms for asthma exacerbations or attacks must be compared against a reference or gold standard definition, and a measure of validity must be included. Articles will be screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers with any disagreements resolved by consensus or arbitration by a third reviewer. Study details will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be assessed using a QUADAS-2 tailored to this review.</p><p><strong>Ethics & dissemination: </strong>No ethical approval is required as this is a review of previously published literature. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal with the aim of being used in future research to help identify asthma exacerbation in EHR.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024545081.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088849\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088849","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:哮喘加重或 "发作 "的严重程度各不相同,轻则症状加重,重则危及生命,需要紧急送医治疗。了解这些恶化情况对于改善对患者的治疗和支持至关重要。电子健康记录(EHR)使用来自初级和二级医疗机构的哮喘患者的匿名数据,可用于了解病情恶化和治疗效果。然而,以往的研究发现,用于定义哮喘加重的算法存在很大差异。在电子病历中验证哮喘加重的定义将为未来的研究提供更可靠、更具可比性的证据:将在 Medline 和 Embase 中搜索与哮喘加重、电子病历和验证相关的关键概念。将考虑所有在 2024 年 5 月 30 日之前发表的、用英语撰写的、在电子病历和行政报销数据库中验证哮喘加重的研究。经过验证的哮喘加重或发作算法必须与参考或金标准定义进行比较,并且必须包含有效性测量。文章将由两名独立审稿人进行筛选,如有分歧,则由第三名审稿人通过协商一致或仲裁的方式解决。研究细节将被提取,偏倚风险将使用为本综述量身定制的 QUADAS-2 进行评估:由于本综述是对以前发表的文献的综述,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将在同行评审期刊上发表,旨在用于未来的研究,帮助在电子病历中识别哮喘加重:CRD42024545081。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validating the recording of exacerbations of asthma in electronic health records: a systematic review protocol.

Introduction: Asthma exacerbations or 'attacks' can vary in severity from mild worsening of symptoms to life-threatening changes that require urgent hospital care. Understanding these exacerbations is crucial to improving treatment and support for patients. Electronic health records (EHR) using anonymised data from people with asthma in primary and secondary care can be used to understand exacerbations and outcomes. However, previous studies found significant heterogeneity in the algorithms used to define asthma exacerbations. Validating definitions of asthma exacerbations in EHR will lead to more robust and comparable evidence in future research.

Methods and analysis: Medline and Embase will be searched for the key concepts relating to asthma exacerbations, EHR and validation. All studies that validate exacerbations of asthma in EHR and administrative claims databases published before 30 May 2024 and written in English will be considered. Validated algorithms for asthma exacerbations or attacks must be compared against a reference or gold standard definition, and a measure of validity must be included. Articles will be screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers with any disagreements resolved by consensus or arbitration by a third reviewer. Study details will be extracted, and the risk of bias will be assessed using a QUADAS-2 tailored to this review.

Ethics & dissemination: No ethical approval is required as this is a review of previously published literature. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal with the aim of being used in future research to help identify asthma exacerbation in EHR.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024545081.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Consensus definition of a radiologically healed fistula on magnetic resonance imaging in perianal Crohn's disease: an international Delphi study. An uncertain future: perspectives of emerging adults with inflammatory bowel disease-a qualitative semistructured interview study in eastern China. Behavioural economics to improve and motivate vaccination in primary care using nudges through the electronic health record: rationale and design of the BE IMMUNE randomised clinical trial. Economic effects of priority setting in healthcare: a scoping review of current evidence. Effects of low-dose aspirin in bipolar disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the A-Bipolar RCT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1