伊朗政府教学医院医生和护士对患者安全的态度:横断面调查。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089328
Edris Kakemam, Farzaneh Miri, Sevda Sadeghpour, Alireza Mirzaei, Jalal Saeidpour
{"title":"伊朗政府教学医院医生和护士对患者安全的态度:横断面调查。","authors":"Edris Kakemam, Farzaneh Miri, Sevda Sadeghpour, Alireza Mirzaei, Jalal Saeidpour","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare attitudes towards patient safety among physicians and nurses in Iranian governmental teaching hospitals and to identify factors associated with attitudes towards patient safety.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An institution-based, cross-sectional survey was carried out from July to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>10 governmental teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study participants comprised a random sample of 186 nurses and 90 physicians who had worked for at least 6 months in their current hospitals.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were mean and SD scores for individual items and the nine main patient safety domains assessed by the Attitudes Toward Patient Safety Questionnaire-III. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of physicians and nurses who responded positively to each item, expressed as percentages for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians and nurses exhibited moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety (mean scores of 3.79±0.33 and 3.83±0.36, respectively). Both professional groups reported the most positive attitudes in the same dimensions: 'team functioning' and 'working hours as a cause for error' (mean scores of >4 out of 5). Conversely, the lowest scores were observed in 'importance of patient safety in the curriculum', indicating potential gaps in their understanding of patient safety (mean scores of <3.5 out of 5). Physicians displayed significantly more positive attitudes in the domain of 'error inevitability', while nurses held more positive attitudes in 'error reporting confidence' and 'disclosure responsibility' (p<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the factors associated with more positive attitudes towards patient safety included lower workload (B=0.131; 95% CI 0.047 to 0.215; p=0.002), reporting of adverse events (B=0.100; 95% CI 0.009 to 0.191; p=0.030) and receiving patient safety training (B=0.134; 95% CI 0.019 to 0.249; p< 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both professional groups demonstrated moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety. However, the findings highlighted the need for future patient safety training to prioritise enhancement of healthcare professionals' understanding of medical errors. Such training initiatives should be engaging and directly relevant to the specific needs of both nurses and physicians, ensuring its perceived value to their ongoing professional development. Furthermore, fostering a supportive and blame-free environment that encourages the reporting of medical errors is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes towards patient safety among physicians and nurses in Iranian governmental teaching hospitals: a cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Edris Kakemam, Farzaneh Miri, Sevda Sadeghpour, Alireza Mirzaei, Jalal Saeidpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare attitudes towards patient safety among physicians and nurses in Iranian governmental teaching hospitals and to identify factors associated with attitudes towards patient safety.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An institution-based, cross-sectional survey was carried out from July to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>10 governmental teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study participants comprised a random sample of 186 nurses and 90 physicians who had worked for at least 6 months in their current hospitals.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measures were mean and SD scores for individual items and the nine main patient safety domains assessed by the Attitudes Toward Patient Safety Questionnaire-III. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of physicians and nurses who responded positively to each item, expressed as percentages for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physicians and nurses exhibited moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety (mean scores of 3.79±0.33 and 3.83±0.36, respectively). Both professional groups reported the most positive attitudes in the same dimensions: 'team functioning' and 'working hours as a cause for error' (mean scores of >4 out of 5). Conversely, the lowest scores were observed in 'importance of patient safety in the curriculum', indicating potential gaps in their understanding of patient safety (mean scores of <3.5 out of 5). Physicians displayed significantly more positive attitudes in the domain of 'error inevitability', while nurses held more positive attitudes in 'error reporting confidence' and 'disclosure responsibility' (p<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the factors associated with more positive attitudes towards patient safety included lower workload (B=0.131; 95% CI 0.047 to 0.215; p=0.002), reporting of adverse events (B=0.100; 95% CI 0.009 to 0.191; p=0.030) and receiving patient safety training (B=0.134; 95% CI 0.019 to 0.249; p< 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both professional groups demonstrated moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety. However, the findings highlighted the need for future patient safety training to prioritise enhancement of healthcare professionals' understanding of medical errors. Such training initiatives should be engaging and directly relevant to the specific needs of both nurses and physicians, ensuring its perceived value to their ongoing professional development. Furthermore, fostering a supportive and blame-free environment that encourages the reporting of medical errors is crucial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估和比较伊朗政府教学医院的医生和护士对患者安全的态度,并确定与患者安全态度相关的因素:设计:于 2023 年 7 月至 8 月进行了一项基于机构的横断面调查:地点:伊朗德黑兰的 10 家政府教学医院:研究对象:随机抽样的 186 名护士和 90 名医生,他们在当前医院工作了至少 6 个月:主要结果测量指标是患者安全态度问卷-III 评估的单个项目和九个主要患者安全领域的平均分和 SD 分。次要结果指标是对每个项目做出积极回应的医生和护士的比例,以每组的百分比表示:结果:医生和护士对患者安全持中度积极态度(平均分分别为 3.79±0.33 和 3.83±0.36)。两个专业组在相同的维度上都表现出最积极的态度:团队运作 "和 "工作时间是导致出错的原因"(平均分大于 4 分(满分 5 分))。相反,他们在 "患者安全在课程中的重要性 "方面的得分最低,这表明他们对患者安全的理解可能还存在差距(平均分为 5 分,满分为 5 分):两个专业组对患者安全的态度都比较积极。然而,研究结果突出表明,未来的患者安全培训需要优先加强医护人员对医疗差错的理解。此类培训活动应具有吸引力,并直接与护士和医生的具体需求相关,确保他们认为培训对其持续的专业发展具有价值。此外,营造一个鼓励报告医疗事故的支持性免责环境也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes towards patient safety among physicians and nurses in Iranian governmental teaching hospitals: a cross-sectional survey.

Objectives: To assess and compare attitudes towards patient safety among physicians and nurses in Iranian governmental teaching hospitals and to identify factors associated with attitudes towards patient safety.

Design: An institution-based, cross-sectional survey was carried out from July to August 2023.

Setting: 10 governmental teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran.

Participants: The study participants comprised a random sample of 186 nurses and 90 physicians who had worked for at least 6 months in their current hospitals.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were mean and SD scores for individual items and the nine main patient safety domains assessed by the Attitudes Toward Patient Safety Questionnaire-III. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of physicians and nurses who responded positively to each item, expressed as percentages for each group.

Results: Physicians and nurses exhibited moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety (mean scores of 3.79±0.33 and 3.83±0.36, respectively). Both professional groups reported the most positive attitudes in the same dimensions: 'team functioning' and 'working hours as a cause for error' (mean scores of >4 out of 5). Conversely, the lowest scores were observed in 'importance of patient safety in the curriculum', indicating potential gaps in their understanding of patient safety (mean scores of <3.5 out of 5). Physicians displayed significantly more positive attitudes in the domain of 'error inevitability', while nurses held more positive attitudes in 'error reporting confidence' and 'disclosure responsibility' (p<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the factors associated with more positive attitudes towards patient safety included lower workload (B=0.131; 95% CI 0.047 to 0.215; p=0.002), reporting of adverse events (B=0.100; 95% CI 0.009 to 0.191; p=0.030) and receiving patient safety training (B=0.134; 95% CI 0.019 to 0.249; p< 0.023).

Conclusion: Both professional groups demonstrated moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety. However, the findings highlighted the need for future patient safety training to prioritise enhancement of healthcare professionals' understanding of medical errors. Such training initiatives should be engaging and directly relevant to the specific needs of both nurses and physicians, ensuring its perceived value to their ongoing professional development. Furthermore, fostering a supportive and blame-free environment that encourages the reporting of medical errors is crucial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis. Post-COVID in healthcare workers and its consequences on quality of life, activities, participation, need for rehabilitation and care experiences: protocol of a cohort study. Association between life satisfaction and health behaviours among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Determinants of inpatient satisfaction and hospital recommendation: experiences from a cross-sectional study of a tertiary general hospital in China. Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1