一家三级转诊中心的妇科肿瘤转诊至专科姑息治疗:人群、特征和结果。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2024-005166
Anthony James Goodings, Sten Kajitani, Mila Pastrak, Elaine Cunningham, Hannah O'Brien, Catherine Weadick, Karie Dennehy
{"title":"一家三级转诊中心的妇科肿瘤转诊至专科姑息治疗:人群、特征和结果。","authors":"Anthony James Goodings, Sten Kajitani, Mila Pastrak, Elaine Cunningham, Hannah O'Brien, Catherine Weadick, Karie Dennehy","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The early integration of a specialist palliative care team is demonstrated to have numerous benefits for patients. These extend beyond end-of-life care to include reducing depressive symptoms, improving quality of life and reducing unnecessary interventions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to characterise the patient population referred to the specialist palliative care service with a diagnosis of gynaecological cancer. It also assesses referral frequency and response time in order to understand palliative care utilisation in an acute hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review and database analysis were performed to extract data on demographics, cancer diagnoses and referral reasons for patients referred to the specialist palliative care service over 3 years. The study focuses on identifying patterns in the characteristics of the referred patient population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 162 patients revealed a distribution across cancer subtypes: 62% ovarian, 22% endometrial, 12% cervical and 4% vulvar. A notable finding was that the outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer were more likely to be discharged home with or without community care (62%) compared with those with endometrial cancer (41%). A rapid response to referrals was observed, with 70% reviewed within 3 days and 98% within a week. This highlights the service's efficiency and the demographic and diagnostic profile of the patient served.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study gives insight into the demographic and diagnostic profiles of patients with gynaecological cancer referred for palliative care, alongside demonstrating rapid response to such referrals. Despite the rapid assessment times, the research importantly identifies differences in outcomes among different cancer subtypes, with a particular emphasis on the variance in discharge destinations. These findings reflect both patient preferences and medical needs, demonstrating the role of tailoring palliative care approaches to meet the individual needs and desires of this diverse patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gynaecologic oncology referrals to specialist palliative care in a tertiary referral centre: population, characteristics and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony James Goodings, Sten Kajitani, Mila Pastrak, Elaine Cunningham, Hannah O'Brien, Catherine Weadick, Karie Dennehy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2024-005166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The early integration of a specialist palliative care team is demonstrated to have numerous benefits for patients. These extend beyond end-of-life care to include reducing depressive symptoms, improving quality of life and reducing unnecessary interventions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to characterise the patient population referred to the specialist palliative care service with a diagnosis of gynaecological cancer. It also assesses referral frequency and response time in order to understand palliative care utilisation in an acute hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review and database analysis were performed to extract data on demographics, cancer diagnoses and referral reasons for patients referred to the specialist palliative care service over 3 years. The study focuses on identifying patterns in the characteristics of the referred patient population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 162 patients revealed a distribution across cancer subtypes: 62% ovarian, 22% endometrial, 12% cervical and 4% vulvar. A notable finding was that the outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer were more likely to be discharged home with or without community care (62%) compared with those with endometrial cancer (41%). A rapid response to referrals was observed, with 70% reviewed within 3 days and 98% within a week. This highlights the service's efficiency and the demographic and diagnostic profile of the patient served.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study gives insight into the demographic and diagnostic profiles of patients with gynaecological cancer referred for palliative care, alongside demonstrating rapid response to such referrals. Despite the rapid assessment times, the research importantly identifies differences in outcomes among different cancer subtypes, with a particular emphasis on the variance in discharge destinations. These findings reflect both patient preferences and medical needs, demonstrating the role of tailoring palliative care approaches to meet the individual needs and desires of this diverse patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:事实证明,尽早整合姑息关怀专科团队可为患者带来诸多益处。这些益处超出了临终关怀的范围,包括减少抑郁症状、提高生活质量和减少不必要的干预。目的:本研究旨在描述被转诊至专科姑息关怀服务并诊断为妇科癌症的病人群体的特征,同时评估转诊频率和响应时间,以了解姑息关怀服务在急症医院环境中的使用情况。研究还评估了转诊频率和响应时间,以了解姑息关怀在急症医院环境中的使用情况:方法:通过回顾性病历和数据库分析,提取三年内转诊至姑息关怀专科的患者的人口统计学、癌症诊断和转诊原因等数据。研究的重点是确定转诊病人群体的特征模式:结果:对162名患者进行的分析显示了癌症亚型的分布情况:62%为卵巢癌,22%为子宫内膜癌,12%为宫颈癌,4%为外阴癌。一个值得注意的发现是,与子宫内膜癌患者(41%)相比,卵巢癌患者更有可能在接受或不接受社区护理的情况下出院回家(62%)。转诊反应迅速,70%的病人在 3 天内得到复查,98%的病人在一周内得到复查。这凸显了该服务的效率以及所服务患者的人口统计学和诊断概况:这项研究深入了解了转诊接受姑息关怀的妇科癌症患者的人口统计学和诊断概况,同时还展示了对此类转诊的快速反应。尽管评估时间较短,但研究发现了不同癌症亚型在治疗结果上的差异,特别是出院后的去向差异。这些研究结果反映了病人的偏好和医疗需求,证明了姑息关怀方法在满足不同病人群体的个人需求和愿望方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gynaecologic oncology referrals to specialist palliative care in a tertiary referral centre: population, characteristics and outcomes.

Background: The early integration of a specialist palliative care team is demonstrated to have numerous benefits for patients. These extend beyond end-of-life care to include reducing depressive symptoms, improving quality of life and reducing unnecessary interventions.

Aims: This study aims to characterise the patient population referred to the specialist palliative care service with a diagnosis of gynaecological cancer. It also assesses referral frequency and response time in order to understand palliative care utilisation in an acute hospital setting.

Methods: A retrospective chart review and database analysis were performed to extract data on demographics, cancer diagnoses and referral reasons for patients referred to the specialist palliative care service over 3 years. The study focuses on identifying patterns in the characteristics of the referred patient population.

Results: Analysis of 162 patients revealed a distribution across cancer subtypes: 62% ovarian, 22% endometrial, 12% cervical and 4% vulvar. A notable finding was that the outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer were more likely to be discharged home with or without community care (62%) compared with those with endometrial cancer (41%). A rapid response to referrals was observed, with 70% reviewed within 3 days and 98% within a week. This highlights the service's efficiency and the demographic and diagnostic profile of the patient served.

Conclusions: This study gives insight into the demographic and diagnostic profiles of patients with gynaecological cancer referred for palliative care, alongside demonstrating rapid response to such referrals. Despite the rapid assessment times, the research importantly identifies differences in outcomes among different cancer subtypes, with a particular emphasis on the variance in discharge destinations. These findings reflect both patient preferences and medical needs, demonstrating the role of tailoring palliative care approaches to meet the individual needs and desires of this diverse patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Caregiver burden and quality of life in palliative care: cross-sectional study. Comparison of a novel methadone rotation method with other commonly used methods. Gynaecologic oncology referrals to specialist palliative care in a tertiary referral centre: population, characteristics and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1