普利西兰与 PCSK9 抑制剂相比,他汀类药物加依折麦布治疗高脂血症的疗效和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1186/s12872-024-04321-z
Shengxuan Zhang, Lei Sun, Xinyu Xu, Yanling Zhang, Qilan Chen
{"title":"普利西兰与 PCSK9 抑制剂相比,他汀类药物加依折麦布治疗高脂血症的疗效和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Shengxuan Zhang, Lei Sun, Xinyu Xu, Yanling Zhang, Qilan Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12872-024-04321-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hyperlipidemia plays a crucial role in increasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. Recent studies have established that inclisiran positively influences lipid regulation. Nevertheless, its effectiveness in comparison to conventional treatments is still questionable. Hence, a methodical assessment of its effectiveness and safety is required. This research evaluates the efficacy and safety of inclisiran, PCSK9 inhibitors, and the combination of statins with ezetimibe in the treatment of hyperlipidemia via a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an extensive search of English-language publications in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until April 2024. We conducted a web-based meta-analysis and reported in accordance with the guidelines. We selected the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as efficacy evaluation metrics and the incidence of adverse events as safety evaluation metrics for analysis and comparison.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We incorporated 33 studies involving 23,375 patients, evaluating three interventions regarding their effects on LDL-C, TC, TG, HDL-C, and adverse events. All treatments improved metrics over placebo. Inclisiran significantly reduced LDL-C compared to statins (mean - 15.21, 95% CI [-25.19, -5.23]) but showed no significant difference from statin + ezetimibe. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) rankings placed inclisiran highest for LDL-C reduction (26.2%). The combination of statin and ezetimibe was the most efficacious for triglyceride reduction (mean 17.2, 95% CI [10.22, 24.19]; mean 15.61, 95% CI [16.87, 24.35]). The safety profiles were comparable across treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inclisiran with its superior LDL-C reduction and low frequency of administration, appears promising for hyperlipidemia treatment, particularly for patients with adherence issues or side effects from other medications.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>CRD42024550852.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of inclisiran versus PCSK9 inhibitor versus statin plus ezetimibe therapy in hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shengxuan Zhang, Lei Sun, Xinyu Xu, Yanling Zhang, Qilan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12872-024-04321-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hyperlipidemia plays a crucial role in increasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. Recent studies have established that inclisiran positively influences lipid regulation. Nevertheless, its effectiveness in comparison to conventional treatments is still questionable. Hence, a methodical assessment of its effectiveness and safety is required. This research evaluates the efficacy and safety of inclisiran, PCSK9 inhibitors, and the combination of statins with ezetimibe in the treatment of hyperlipidemia via a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an extensive search of English-language publications in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until April 2024. We conducted a web-based meta-analysis and reported in accordance with the guidelines. We selected the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as efficacy evaluation metrics and the incidence of adverse events as safety evaluation metrics for analysis and comparison.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We incorporated 33 studies involving 23,375 patients, evaluating three interventions regarding their effects on LDL-C, TC, TG, HDL-C, and adverse events. All treatments improved metrics over placebo. Inclisiran significantly reduced LDL-C compared to statins (mean - 15.21, 95% CI [-25.19, -5.23]) but showed no significant difference from statin + ezetimibe. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) rankings placed inclisiran highest for LDL-C reduction (26.2%). The combination of statin and ezetimibe was the most efficacious for triglyceride reduction (mean 17.2, 95% CI [10.22, 24.19]; mean 15.61, 95% CI [16.87, 24.35]). The safety profiles were comparable across treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inclisiran with its superior LDL-C reduction and low frequency of administration, appears promising for hyperlipidemia treatment, particularly for patients with adherence issues or side effects from other medications.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>CRD42024550852.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549808/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04321-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04321-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高脂血症在增加动脉粥样硬化等心血管疾病的风险方面起着至关重要的作用。最近的研究证实 inclisiran 对血脂调节有积极影响。然而,与传统治疗方法相比,它的有效性仍然值得怀疑。因此,需要对其有效性和安全性进行系统评估。本研究通过对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行网络荟萃分析,评估了普利西兰、PCSK9 抑制剂以及他汀类药物联合依折麦布治疗高脂血症的有效性和安全性:我们广泛检索了 PubMed、Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中截至 2024 年 4 月的英文出版物。我们进行了基于网络的荟萃分析,并根据指南进行了报告。我们选择了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)的百分比变化作为疗效评价指标,不良事件发生率作为安全性评价指标进行分析和比较:我们纳入了 33 项研究,涉及 23,375 名患者,评估了三种干预措施对 LDL-C、TC、TG、HDL-C 和不良事件的影响。与安慰剂相比,所有治疗方法都改善了指标。与他汀类药物相比,英克利西兰能明显降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(平均值-15.21,95% CI [-25.19,-5.23]),但与他汀类药物+依折麦布相比无明显差异。累积排名曲线下表面(SUCRA)排名显示,普利西兰的 LDL-C 降低率最高(26.2%)。他汀和依折麦布的组合对降低甘油三酯最有效(平均17.2,95% CI [10.22,24.19];平均15.61,95% CI [16.87,24.35])。不同治疗方法的安全性相当:结论:英克西然具有降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的优势,且用药频率低,似乎有望用于高脂血症的治疗,特别是对于有依从性问题或其他药物副作用的患者:CRD42024550852。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of inclisiran versus PCSK9 inhibitor versus statin plus ezetimibe therapy in hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Objective: Hyperlipidemia plays a crucial role in increasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. Recent studies have established that inclisiran positively influences lipid regulation. Nevertheless, its effectiveness in comparison to conventional treatments is still questionable. Hence, a methodical assessment of its effectiveness and safety is required. This research evaluates the efficacy and safety of inclisiran, PCSK9 inhibitors, and the combination of statins with ezetimibe in the treatment of hyperlipidemia via a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We performed an extensive search of English-language publications in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until April 2024. We conducted a web-based meta-analysis and reported in accordance with the guidelines. We selected the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as efficacy evaluation metrics and the incidence of adverse events as safety evaluation metrics for analysis and comparison.

Result: We incorporated 33 studies involving 23,375 patients, evaluating three interventions regarding their effects on LDL-C, TC, TG, HDL-C, and adverse events. All treatments improved metrics over placebo. Inclisiran significantly reduced LDL-C compared to statins (mean - 15.21, 95% CI [-25.19, -5.23]) but showed no significant difference from statin + ezetimibe. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) rankings placed inclisiran highest for LDL-C reduction (26.2%). The combination of statin and ezetimibe was the most efficacious for triglyceride reduction (mean 17.2, 95% CI [10.22, 24.19]; mean 15.61, 95% CI [16.87, 24.35]). The safety profiles were comparable across treatments.

Conclusion: Inclisiran with its superior LDL-C reduction and low frequency of administration, appears promising for hyperlipidemia treatment, particularly for patients with adherence issues or side effects from other medications.

Systematic review registration: CRD42024550852.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
Association of celiac disease and myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association between homocysteine levels and mortality in CVD: a cohort study based on NHANES database. LDHA exacerbates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through inducing NLRP3 lactylation. Correction: Correlation of serum homocysteine and cystatin C levels with prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients. Ethnic disparities and lifestyle determinants in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease among Han majority and Ha Ni ethnic minority older adults in rural Southwest China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1