健康的社会决定因素与心力衰竭指南指导下医疗疗法优化中的差异。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Heart Failure Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012357
Joshua A Jacobs, Iyanuoluwa Ayodele, Adam P Bress, Madeline R Sterling, Ambarish Pandey, Catherine G Derington, Alexander R Zheutlin, Kevin S Shah, Stephen J Greene, Brooke Alhanti, Rosalia Blanco, Gregg C Fonarow
{"title":"健康的社会决定因素与心力衰竭指南指导下医疗疗法优化中的差异。","authors":"Joshua A Jacobs, Iyanuoluwa Ayodele, Adam P Bress, Madeline R Sterling, Ambarish Pandey, Catherine G Derington, Alexander R Zheutlin, Kevin S Shah, Stephen J Greene, Brooke Alhanti, Rosalia Blanco, Gregg C Fonarow","doi":"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fewer than 20% of eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receive all 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy. Understanding disparities by race, ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health is necessary to equitably optimize quadruple therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry, we examined associations between race and ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health (insurance type and documented social need [any barrier to accessing health care]) with quadruple therapy optimization (QTO) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction hospitalized between July 1, 2021, and September 30, 2023, with complete medication data at discharge. We calculated adjusted mean differences (AMDs) in the discharge QTO score (range, 0%-100%) reflecting the proportion of eligible use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and compared across demographic and adverse social determinants of health groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 82 637 patients (median age, 66 years; 32.5% female; 57.0% non-Hispanic White; 76.4% prior heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), the overall mean QTO score was 56.2% (SD, 25.5). After adjustment, compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, Black (AMD, 2.56 percentage points [95% CI, 2.16-2.96]) and Hispanic individuals (AMD, 0.71 percentage points [95% CI, 0.11-1.31]) had higher QTO scores. Females had higher QTO scores than males (AMD, 1.94 percentage points [95% CI, 1.58-2.31]). Patients with no insurance (AMD, -4.90 percentage points [-5.62 to -4.17]), Medicaid (AMD, -0.45 percentage points [-0.89 to -0.01]), and Medicare (AMD, -1.64 percentage points [-2.10 to -1.18]) had lower QTO scores versus private insurance. Those with an identified social need (n=24 651) had lower QTO scores than those without (AMD, -3.40 percentage points [95% CI, -4.10 to -2.71]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities in QTO were most evident for patients with no insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, or potentially an identified social need. Future efforts should focus on reducing gaps to improve equitable guideline-directed medical therapy use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"e012357"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua A Jacobs, Iyanuoluwa Ayodele, Adam P Bress, Madeline R Sterling, Ambarish Pandey, Catherine G Derington, Alexander R Zheutlin, Kevin S Shah, Stephen J Greene, Brooke Alhanti, Rosalia Blanco, Gregg C Fonarow\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fewer than 20% of eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receive all 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy. Understanding disparities by race, ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health is necessary to equitably optimize quadruple therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry, we examined associations between race and ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health (insurance type and documented social need [any barrier to accessing health care]) with quadruple therapy optimization (QTO) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction hospitalized between July 1, 2021, and September 30, 2023, with complete medication data at discharge. We calculated adjusted mean differences (AMDs) in the discharge QTO score (range, 0%-100%) reflecting the proportion of eligible use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and compared across demographic and adverse social determinants of health groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 82 637 patients (median age, 66 years; 32.5% female; 57.0% non-Hispanic White; 76.4% prior heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), the overall mean QTO score was 56.2% (SD, 25.5). After adjustment, compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, Black (AMD, 2.56 percentage points [95% CI, 2.16-2.96]) and Hispanic individuals (AMD, 0.71 percentage points [95% CI, 0.11-1.31]) had higher QTO scores. Females had higher QTO scores than males (AMD, 1.94 percentage points [95% CI, 1.58-2.31]). Patients with no insurance (AMD, -4.90 percentage points [-5.62 to -4.17]), Medicaid (AMD, -0.45 percentage points [-0.89 to -0.01]), and Medicare (AMD, -1.64 percentage points [-2.10 to -1.18]) had lower QTO scores versus private insurance. Those with an identified social need (n=24 651) had lower QTO scores than those without (AMD, -3.40 percentage points [95% CI, -4.10 to -2.71]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities in QTO were most evident for patients with no insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, or potentially an identified social need. Future efforts should focus on reducing gaps to improve equitable guideline-directed medical therapy use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e012357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012357\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在符合条件的射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者中,只有不到 20% 的患者接受了指南指导下的全部四个支柱疗法。要想公平地优化四联疗法,就必须了解种族、民族、性别和不利的社会健康决定因素之间的差异:利用美国心脏协会的 "Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure "登记册,我们研究了 2021 年 7 月 1 日至 2023 年 9 月 30 日期间住院的射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者中,出院时有完整用药数据的种族和民族、性别以及不利的健康社会决定因素(保险类型和有记录的社会需求[获得医疗保健的任何障碍])与四联疗法优化(QTO)之间的关系。我们计算了反映肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂、β-受体阻滞剂、矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂合格使用比例的出院QTO评分调整后平均差(AMDs)(范围为0%-100%),并在人口统计学和不利社会健康决定因素组之间进行了比较:82 637 名患者(中位年龄 66 岁;32.5% 为女性;57.0% 为非西班牙裔白人;76.4% 曾患有射血分数降低的心力衰竭)的 QTO 总平均得分率为 56.2%(标清,25.5 分)。经调整后,与非西班牙裔白人相比,黑人(AMD,2.56 个百分点 [95% CI,2.16-2.96])和西班牙裔(AMD,0.71 个百分点 [95% CI,0.11-1.31])的 QTO 得分更高。女性的 QTO 分数高于男性(AMD,1.94 个百分点 [95% CI,1.58-2.31])。无保险(AMD,-4.90 个百分点 [-5.62 到 -4.17])、医疗补助(AMD,-0.45 个百分点 [-0.89 到 -0.01])和医疗保险(AMD,-1.64 个百分点 [-2.10 到 -1.18])患者的 QTO 分数低于私人保险患者。已确定有社会需求者(n=24 651)的 QTO 分数低于无社会需求者(AMD,-3.40 个百分点 [95% CI,-4.10 至 -2.71]):无保险、享受医疗补助、医疗保险或有潜在社会需求的患者在 QTO 方面的差距最为明显。未来的工作重点应放在缩小差距上,以改善指导原则指导下的医疗疗法的公平使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure.

Background: Fewer than 20% of eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receive all 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy. Understanding disparities by race, ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health is necessary to equitably optimize quadruple therapy.

Methods: Utilizing the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry, we examined associations between race and ethnicity, sex, and adverse social determinants of health (insurance type and documented social need [any barrier to accessing health care]) with quadruple therapy optimization (QTO) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction hospitalized between July 1, 2021, and September 30, 2023, with complete medication data at discharge. We calculated adjusted mean differences (AMDs) in the discharge QTO score (range, 0%-100%) reflecting the proportion of eligible use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and compared across demographic and adverse social determinants of health groups.

Results: Among 82 637 patients (median age, 66 years; 32.5% female; 57.0% non-Hispanic White; 76.4% prior heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), the overall mean QTO score was 56.2% (SD, 25.5). After adjustment, compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, Black (AMD, 2.56 percentage points [95% CI, 2.16-2.96]) and Hispanic individuals (AMD, 0.71 percentage points [95% CI, 0.11-1.31]) had higher QTO scores. Females had higher QTO scores than males (AMD, 1.94 percentage points [95% CI, 1.58-2.31]). Patients with no insurance (AMD, -4.90 percentage points [-5.62 to -4.17]), Medicaid (AMD, -0.45 percentage points [-0.89 to -0.01]), and Medicare (AMD, -1.64 percentage points [-2.10 to -1.18]) had lower QTO scores versus private insurance. Those with an identified social need (n=24 651) had lower QTO scores than those without (AMD, -3.40 percentage points [95% CI, -4.10 to -2.71]).

Conclusions: Disparities in QTO were most evident for patients with no insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, or potentially an identified social need. Future efforts should focus on reducing gaps to improve equitable guideline-directed medical therapy use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
期刊最新文献
Natural Language Processing to Adjudicate Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Global Clinical Trials. A Medical Expert System for Intelligent Telemonitoring of Chronic Heart Failure Patients: Preliminary Validation and Perspectives. Comprehensive Proteomics Profiling Identifies Circulating Biomarkers to Distinguish Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Other Cardiomyopathies with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Mavacamten: Real-World Experience from 22 Months of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program. Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1