乳腺癌受体亚型和 CSF 细胞学状态对睑板腺疾病患者存活率的影响

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.019
Sujan Niraula, Sugam Gouli, Andrea M Baran, Ruth O'Regan, Haley Tyburski, Huina Zhang, Sara Hardy, Nimish Mohile, Carey K Anders, Ajay Dhakal
{"title":"乳腺癌受体亚型和 CSF 细胞学状态对睑板腺疾病患者存活率的影响","authors":"Sujan Niraula, Sugam Gouli, Andrea M Baran, Ruth O'Regan, Haley Tyburski, Huina Zhang, Sara Hardy, Nimish Mohile, Carey K Anders, Ajay Dhakal","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear whether breast cancer (BC) subtypes or CSF cytology results are associated with overall survival (OS) among patients with BC leptomeningeal disease (LMD). This single-institution retrospective study compares OS among BC patients with LMD across various breast cancer subtypes and CSF cytology results.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study enrolled BC patients diagnosed with LMD between 2010 and 2023. Breast cancer subtypes were classified as A. ER+/HER2-, HER2+, or triple-negative BC (TNBC); B. HER2+, HER2-Low, HER2-Zero. CSF cytology subtypes included CSF+, CSF-, or CSF not tested (NT). OS was summarized via Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank test. Cox models were used for multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 69 patients registered, median OS (95% CI) for ER+/HER2- (n = 33), HER2+ (n = 12) and TNBC (n = 24) subtypes were 8.0 (3.02, 24.8), 5.71 (1.61, not estimated) and 3.2 (1.11, 4.95) months (P = .17). In multivariate analysis, TNBC was associated with worse OS versus ER+/HER2- [Hazard Ratio (HR), 95% CI: 2.64, 1.23-5.80, P = .04]. HER2 subtypes (HER2-Zero, n = 21; HER2-Low, n = 32; HER2+, n = 12) showed no significant differences in OS. Median OS (95% CI) for CSF+ (n = 16), CSF- (n = 18), and CSF NT (n = 35) groups were 3.54 (1.61, 12.72), 13.41 (4.95, 61.93) and 3.28 (1.44, 6.92) months (P = .04). Multivariate analysis showed both CSF+ and CSF NT were associated with shorter OS compared to CSF- group [HR (95% CI) 4.50 (1.75, 12.11) for CSF+ vs. CSF-; 2.91 (1.45, 6.26) for CSF NT vs. CSF-; P = .002].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TNBC LMD group was associated with worse OS than ER+/HER2- BC LMD when adjusting for other prognostic factors. CSF- LMD patients had better OS than CSF+ or CSF NT LMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Breast Cancer Receptor Subtypes and CSF Cytology Status on Survival of Patients With Leptomeningeal Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Sujan Niraula, Sugam Gouli, Andrea M Baran, Ruth O'Regan, Haley Tyburski, Huina Zhang, Sara Hardy, Nimish Mohile, Carey K Anders, Ajay Dhakal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear whether breast cancer (BC) subtypes or CSF cytology results are associated with overall survival (OS) among patients with BC leptomeningeal disease (LMD). This single-institution retrospective study compares OS among BC patients with LMD across various breast cancer subtypes and CSF cytology results.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study enrolled BC patients diagnosed with LMD between 2010 and 2023. Breast cancer subtypes were classified as A. ER+/HER2-, HER2+, or triple-negative BC (TNBC); B. HER2+, HER2-Low, HER2-Zero. CSF cytology subtypes included CSF+, CSF-, or CSF not tested (NT). OS was summarized via Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank test. Cox models were used for multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 69 patients registered, median OS (95% CI) for ER+/HER2- (n = 33), HER2+ (n = 12) and TNBC (n = 24) subtypes were 8.0 (3.02, 24.8), 5.71 (1.61, not estimated) and 3.2 (1.11, 4.95) months (P = .17). In multivariate analysis, TNBC was associated with worse OS versus ER+/HER2- [Hazard Ratio (HR), 95% CI: 2.64, 1.23-5.80, P = .04]. HER2 subtypes (HER2-Zero, n = 21; HER2-Low, n = 32; HER2+, n = 12) showed no significant differences in OS. Median OS (95% CI) for CSF+ (n = 16), CSF- (n = 18), and CSF NT (n = 35) groups were 3.54 (1.61, 12.72), 13.41 (4.95, 61.93) and 3.28 (1.44, 6.92) months (P = .04). Multivariate analysis showed both CSF+ and CSF NT were associated with shorter OS compared to CSF- group [HR (95% CI) 4.50 (1.75, 12.11) for CSF+ vs. CSF-; 2.91 (1.45, 6.26) for CSF NT vs. CSF-; P = .002].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TNBC LMD group was associated with worse OS than ER+/HER2- BC LMD when adjusting for other prognostic factors. CSF- LMD patients had better OS than CSF+ or CSF NT LMD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前尚不清楚乳腺癌(BC)亚型或CSF细胞学结果是否与BC左侧脑膜疾病(LMD)患者的总生存期(OS)有关。这项单一机构的回顾性研究比较了不同乳腺癌亚型和CSF细胞学结果的BC LMD患者的OS:该研究招募了2010年至2023年间确诊为LMD的BC患者。乳腺癌亚型分为:A. ER+/HER2-、HER2+或三阴性BC(TNBC);B. HER2+、HER2-Low、HER2-Zero。CSF细胞学亚型包括CSF+、CSF-或CSF未检测(NT)。OS 通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析进行总结,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。Cox模型用于多变量分析:在69名登记患者中,ER+/HER2-(33人)、HER2+(12人)和TNBC(24人)亚型的中位OS(95% CI)分别为8.0(3.02,24.8)、5.71(1.61,未估计)和3.2(1.11,4.95)个月(P = .17)。在多变量分析中,与ER+/HER2-相比,TNBC与较差的OS相关[危险比(HR),95% CI:2.64,1.23-5.80,P = .04]。HER2亚型(HER2-零,n = 21;HER2-低,n = 32;HER2+,n = 12)的OS无显著差异。CSF+组(n = 16)、CSF-组(n = 18)和CSF NT组(n = 35)的中位OS(95% CI)分别为3.54(1.61,12.72)、13.41(4.95,61.93)和3.28(1.44,6.92)个月(P = .04)。多变量分析显示,与CSF-组相比,CSF+和CSF NT与较短的OS相关[CSF+ vs. CSF-的HR(95% CI)为4.50(1.75,12.11);CSF NT vs. CSF-的HR为2.91(1.45,6.26);P = .002]:结论:在调整其他预后因素后,TNBC LMD组的OS比ER+/HER2 BC LMD组更差。CSF- LMD患者的OS优于CSF+或CSF NT LMD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Breast Cancer Receptor Subtypes and CSF Cytology Status on Survival of Patients With Leptomeningeal Disease.

Background: It is unclear whether breast cancer (BC) subtypes or CSF cytology results are associated with overall survival (OS) among patients with BC leptomeningeal disease (LMD). This single-institution retrospective study compares OS among BC patients with LMD across various breast cancer subtypes and CSF cytology results.

Methodology: The study enrolled BC patients diagnosed with LMD between 2010 and 2023. Breast cancer subtypes were classified as A. ER+/HER2-, HER2+, or triple-negative BC (TNBC); B. HER2+, HER2-Low, HER2-Zero. CSF cytology subtypes included CSF+, CSF-, or CSF not tested (NT). OS was summarized via Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank test. Cox models were used for multivariate analyses.

Results: Out of 69 patients registered, median OS (95% CI) for ER+/HER2- (n = 33), HER2+ (n = 12) and TNBC (n = 24) subtypes were 8.0 (3.02, 24.8), 5.71 (1.61, not estimated) and 3.2 (1.11, 4.95) months (P = .17). In multivariate analysis, TNBC was associated with worse OS versus ER+/HER2- [Hazard Ratio (HR), 95% CI: 2.64, 1.23-5.80, P = .04]. HER2 subtypes (HER2-Zero, n = 21; HER2-Low, n = 32; HER2+, n = 12) showed no significant differences in OS. Median OS (95% CI) for CSF+ (n = 16), CSF- (n = 18), and CSF NT (n = 35) groups were 3.54 (1.61, 12.72), 13.41 (4.95, 61.93) and 3.28 (1.44, 6.92) months (P = .04). Multivariate analysis showed both CSF+ and CSF NT were associated with shorter OS compared to CSF- group [HR (95% CI) 4.50 (1.75, 12.11) for CSF+ vs. CSF-; 2.91 (1.45, 6.26) for CSF NT vs. CSF-; P = .002].

Conclusion: TNBC LMD group was associated with worse OS than ER+/HER2- BC LMD when adjusting for other prognostic factors. CSF- LMD patients had better OS than CSF+ or CSF NT LMD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Another Biosignature for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ-Have We Moved the Needle? Development and Validation of a Novel Conditional Survival Nomogram for Predicting Real-Time Prognosis in Patients With Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis. Association of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Muscle Quality at Diagnosis With Survival in Young Women With Breast Cancer: Retrospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1