{"title":"预防透析患者突破性 COVID-19 的 Tixagevimab-cilgavimab 前瞻性研究。","authors":"Sarinya Boongird, Thatsaphan Srithongkul, Sethanant Sethakarun, Jackrapong Bruminhent, Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul, Arkom Nongnuch, Chagriya Kitiyakara, Suchai Sritippayawan","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in dialysis patients remains uncertain due to limited data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter prospective study, we enrolled vaccinated dialysis patients and divided them into two groups: a tixagevimab-cilgavimab group (received a 150 mg/150 mg intramuscular dose of tixagevimab-cilgavimab) and a control group (age-matched patients not receiving tixagevimab-cilgavimab). The primary outcome was the breakthrough COVID-19 rate at 6 months, whereas secondary outcomes included COVID-19-related hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, endotracheal intubation and mortality. The safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred participants were enrolled, with equal numbers in each group (<i>n</i> = 100 each). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, except for a higher number of COVID-19 vaccine doses in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group [median (IQR) 4 (3-5) vs. 3 (3-4); <i>P</i> = .01]. At 6 months, the breakthrough COVID-19 rates were comparable between the tixagevimab-cilgavimab (17%) and control (15%) groups (<i>P</i> = .66). However, the median (IQR) time to diagnosis of breakthrough infections tended to be longer in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group [4.49 (2.81-4.98) vs 1.96 (1.65-2.91) months; <i>P</i> = .08]. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab significantly reduced COVID-19-related hospitalization rates (5.9% vs 40.0%; <i>P</i> = .02) among participants with breakthrough infections. All tixagevimab-cilgavimab-related adverse events were mild.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as PrEP in vaccinated dialysis patients during the Omicron surge did not prevent breakthrough infections but significantly reduced COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Further research should prioritize alternative strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"17 11","pages":"sfae309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tixagevimab-cilgavimab for preventing breakthrough COVID-19 in dialysis patients: a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarinya Boongird, Thatsaphan Srithongkul, Sethanant Sethakarun, Jackrapong Bruminhent, Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul, Arkom Nongnuch, Chagriya Kitiyakara, Suchai Sritippayawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfae309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in dialysis patients remains uncertain due to limited data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter prospective study, we enrolled vaccinated dialysis patients and divided them into two groups: a tixagevimab-cilgavimab group (received a 150 mg/150 mg intramuscular dose of tixagevimab-cilgavimab) and a control group (age-matched patients not receiving tixagevimab-cilgavimab). The primary outcome was the breakthrough COVID-19 rate at 6 months, whereas secondary outcomes included COVID-19-related hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, endotracheal intubation and mortality. The safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred participants were enrolled, with equal numbers in each group (<i>n</i> = 100 each). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, except for a higher number of COVID-19 vaccine doses in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group [median (IQR) 4 (3-5) vs. 3 (3-4); <i>P</i> = .01]. At 6 months, the breakthrough COVID-19 rates were comparable between the tixagevimab-cilgavimab (17%) and control (15%) groups (<i>P</i> = .66). However, the median (IQR) time to diagnosis of breakthrough infections tended to be longer in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group [4.49 (2.81-4.98) vs 1.96 (1.65-2.91) months; <i>P</i> = .08]. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab significantly reduced COVID-19-related hospitalization rates (5.9% vs 40.0%; <i>P</i> = .02) among participants with breakthrough infections. All tixagevimab-cilgavimab-related adverse events were mild.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as PrEP in vaccinated dialysis patients during the Omicron surge did not prevent breakthrough infections but significantly reduced COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Further research should prioritize alternative strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 11\",\"pages\":\"sfae309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae309\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于数据有限,透析患者使用替沙吉单抗-西格维单抗作为暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)预防2019年突破性冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的效果仍不确定:在这项多中心前瞻性研究中,我们招募了已接种疫苗的透析患者,并将其分为两组:替沙吉单抗-替加维单抗组(接受150毫克/150毫克的替沙吉单抗-替加维单抗肌肉注射剂量)和对照组(未接受替沙吉单抗-替加维单抗的年龄匹配患者)。主要结果是6个月时的COVID-19突破率,次要结果包括与COVID-19相关的住院、入住重症监护室、气管插管和死亡率。此外,还对tixagevimab-cilgavimab的安全性进行了评估:共招募了 200 名参与者,每组人数相等(n = 100)。除了替沙吉单抗-西利加维单抗组接种 COVID-19 疫苗的次数较多外(中位数(IQR)4 (3-5) vs. 3 (3-4);P = .01),各组的基线特征具有可比性。6个月时,tixagevimab-cilgavimab组(17%)和对照组(15%)的COVID-19突破率相当(P = .66)。然而,tixagevimab-cilgavimab 组诊断突破性感染的中位(IQR)时间往往更长[4.49 (2.81-4.98) vs 1.96 (1.65-2.91) 个月;P = .08]。在出现突破性感染的参与者中,Tixagevimab-cilgavimab能显著降低COVID-19相关的住院率(5.9% vs 40.0%; P = .02)。所有与tixagevimab-cilgavimab相关的不良事件都很轻微:结论:在Omicron激增期间,在接种疫苗的透析患者中使用tixagevimab-cilgavimab作为PrEP并不能预防突破性感染,但却能显著减少与COVID-19相关的住院治疗。进一步的研究应优先考虑替代策略。
Tixagevimab-cilgavimab for preventing breakthrough COVID-19 in dialysis patients: a prospective study.
Background: The effectiveness of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in dialysis patients remains uncertain due to limited data.
Methods: In this multicenter prospective study, we enrolled vaccinated dialysis patients and divided them into two groups: a tixagevimab-cilgavimab group (received a 150 mg/150 mg intramuscular dose of tixagevimab-cilgavimab) and a control group (age-matched patients not receiving tixagevimab-cilgavimab). The primary outcome was the breakthrough COVID-19 rate at 6 months, whereas secondary outcomes included COVID-19-related hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, endotracheal intubation and mortality. The safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab was assessed.
Results: Two hundred participants were enrolled, with equal numbers in each group (n = 100 each). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups, except for a higher number of COVID-19 vaccine doses in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group [median (IQR) 4 (3-5) vs. 3 (3-4); P = .01]. At 6 months, the breakthrough COVID-19 rates were comparable between the tixagevimab-cilgavimab (17%) and control (15%) groups (P = .66). However, the median (IQR) time to diagnosis of breakthrough infections tended to be longer in the tixagevimab-cilgavimab group [4.49 (2.81-4.98) vs 1.96 (1.65-2.91) months; P = .08]. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab significantly reduced COVID-19-related hospitalization rates (5.9% vs 40.0%; P = .02) among participants with breakthrough infections. All tixagevimab-cilgavimab-related adverse events were mild.
Conclusion: The use of tixagevimab-cilgavimab as PrEP in vaccinated dialysis patients during the Omicron surge did not prevent breakthrough infections but significantly reduced COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Further research should prioritize alternative strategies.
期刊介绍:
About the Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.