应用输尿管软镜碎石负压吸引术和经皮肾镜碎石术治疗直径 2-3 厘米的肾结石。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s10157-024-02588-2
Juan Qi, Dawei Ni, Jiamin Shen
{"title":"应用输尿管软镜碎石负压吸引术和经皮肾镜碎石术治疗直径 2-3 厘米的肾结石。","authors":"Juan Qi, Dawei Ni, Jiamin Shen","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02588-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal calculus, or kidney stone disease, presents a significant healthcare challenge globally, necessitating diverse therapeutic interventions. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy (FURL) are prominent among these interventions, with PCNL favored for stones > 2 cm and FURL for smaller stones and applications of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy with negative pressure suction for stones 1.5-2.5 cm have some benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2019 to January 2024, 310 patients undergoing FURL with negative pressure suction or PCNL for 2-3 cm renal calculi were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic and clinical data were collected, and outcomes including stone-free rates (SFR), postoperative complications, and surgical parameters were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparable SFR were observed between FURL and PCNL groups at 1-month follow-up, although PCNL was superior to FURL after immediately post-surgery. FURL exhibited significantly fewer complications overall (5.7% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.044), shorter hospital stays, and lower postoperative pain levels. The surgical parameters favored FURL, showing lower bleeding volumes, shorter catheter removal times, and less hemoglobin decrease postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite similar stone clearance efficacy at 1-month follow-up, FURL demonstrated superior safety and postoperative outcomes compared to PCNL for 2-3 cm renal calculi. These findings highlight the potential advantages of FURL in reducing complications, enhancing recovery, and optimizing patient care pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applications of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy with negative pressure suction and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of 2-3 cm diameter renal calculi.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Qi, Dawei Ni, Jiamin Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02588-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal calculus, or kidney stone disease, presents a significant healthcare challenge globally, necessitating diverse therapeutic interventions. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy (FURL) are prominent among these interventions, with PCNL favored for stones > 2 cm and FURL for smaller stones and applications of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy with negative pressure suction for stones 1.5-2.5 cm have some benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2019 to January 2024, 310 patients undergoing FURL with negative pressure suction or PCNL for 2-3 cm renal calculi were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic and clinical data were collected, and outcomes including stone-free rates (SFR), postoperative complications, and surgical parameters were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparable SFR were observed between FURL and PCNL groups at 1-month follow-up, although PCNL was superior to FURL after immediately post-surgery. FURL exhibited significantly fewer complications overall (5.7% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.044), shorter hospital stays, and lower postoperative pain levels. The surgical parameters favored FURL, showing lower bleeding volumes, shorter catheter removal times, and less hemoglobin decrease postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite similar stone clearance efficacy at 1-month follow-up, FURL demonstrated superior safety and postoperative outcomes compared to PCNL for 2-3 cm renal calculi. These findings highlight the potential advantages of FURL in reducing complications, enhancing recovery, and optimizing patient care pathways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02588-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02588-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾结石或肾石症是全球面临的重大医疗挑战,需要采取多种治疗干预措施。经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)和柔性输尿管镜碎石术(FURL)是这些干预措施中的佼佼者,PCNL适用于大于2厘米的结石,FURL适用于较小的结石,而应用负压吸引柔性输尿管镜碎石术治疗1.5-2.5厘米的结石有一定的疗效:方法:回顾性分析2019年6月至2024年1月期间,310例因2-3厘米肾结石接受FURL负压吸引或PCNL治疗的患者。收集了人口统计学和临床数据,并比较了无结石率(SFR)、术后并发症和手术参数等结果:结果:随访 1 个月时,FURL 组和 PCNL 组的无结石率相当,但 PCNL 术后即刻无结石率优于 FURL。FURL 的总体并发症明显更少(5.7% 对 19.3%,P = 0.044),住院时间更短,术后疼痛程度更低。手术参数显示,FURL的出血量更少,导管拔出时间更短,术后血红蛋白下降更少:结论:尽管在1个月的随访中结石清除效果相似,但对于2-3厘米的肾结石,FURL的安全性和术后效果优于PCNL。这些发现凸显了 FURL 在减少并发症、促进康复和优化患者护理路径方面的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applications of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy with negative pressure suction and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of 2-3 cm diameter renal calculi.

Background: Renal calculus, or kidney stone disease, presents a significant healthcare challenge globally, necessitating diverse therapeutic interventions. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy (FURL) are prominent among these interventions, with PCNL favored for stones > 2 cm and FURL for smaller stones and applications of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy with negative pressure suction for stones 1.5-2.5 cm have some benefit.

Methods: From June 2019 to January 2024, 310 patients undergoing FURL with negative pressure suction or PCNL for 2-3 cm renal calculi were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic and clinical data were collected, and outcomes including stone-free rates (SFR), postoperative complications, and surgical parameters were compared.

Results: Comparable SFR were observed between FURL and PCNL groups at 1-month follow-up, although PCNL was superior to FURL after immediately post-surgery. FURL exhibited significantly fewer complications overall (5.7% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.044), shorter hospital stays, and lower postoperative pain levels. The surgical parameters favored FURL, showing lower bleeding volumes, shorter catheter removal times, and less hemoglobin decrease postoperatively.

Conclusion: Despite similar stone clearance efficacy at 1-month follow-up, FURL demonstrated superior safety and postoperative outcomes compared to PCNL for 2-3 cm renal calculi. These findings highlight the potential advantages of FURL in reducing complications, enhancing recovery, and optimizing patient care pathways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
期刊最新文献
Chloride removal and bicarbonate replacement by isotonic sodium bicarbonate-based continuous hemodiafiltration: a novel method to correct severe metabolic acidosis. Association of renal volumetry and histological features with marginal donors: risks for donors and recipients in living donor kidney transplantation. Risk factors for septic shock in older patients with urinary tract infection. Efficacy and safety of patiromer for non-dialysis and dialysis patients with hyperkalemia: the randomized, placebo-controlled and long-term study. Effect of monoclonal gammopathy in the progression of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease: a retrospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1