存在和不存在标准可改变风险因素的急性冠状动脉综合征患者存活率的性别差异。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Clinical Research in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7
Vickram Vijay Anand, Jaycie Koh, Tobias Teo, Yip Han Chin, Rishabh Mahesh, Mark Y Chan, Gemma A Figtree, Nicholas W S Chew
{"title":"存在和不存在标准可改变风险因素的急性冠状动脉综合征患者存活率的性别差异。","authors":"Vickram Vijay Anand, Jaycie Koh, Tobias Teo, Yip Han Chin, Rishabh Mahesh, Mark Y Chan, Gemma A Figtree, Nicholas W S Chew","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analysis investigates the sex differences in mortality risk between the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) and those with at least one standard modifiable risk factor (SMuRF), and analyses mortality rates between males and females within the SMuRF-less cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies with sex-stratified outcomes for SMuRF-less versus SMuRF patients with ACS till 15 December 2023. The analysis of variables reported in proportions was carried out by utilizing a meta-analysis with a generalized linear mixed model while continuous variables were analyzed by a meta-analysis of means, using an inverse variance method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included in the current paper, with 82,395 SMuRF-less ACS patients and 607,558 SMuRF ACS patients. Excess in-hospital mortality found in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, were only observed in females (RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.08-2.25, p = 0.029), but not in males (RR 1.59, 95%CI 0.90-2.80, p = 0.088). On longer follow-up, the 1- and 2-year post-ACS mortality rates were similar across the SMuRF-less and SMuRF cohorts, for both sexes. The subgroup analysis of SMuRF-less ACS individuals revealed that SMuRF-less females had higher in-hospital (RR 1.52, 95%CI 1.30-1.78, p = 0.002), 1-year (RR 1.51, 95%CI 1.34-1.71, p = 0.005) and 2-year mortality risks (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.13-1.75, p = 0.016) compared to the SMuRF-less male counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paradoxical excess mortality in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, was only observed in females. Females without cardiovascular risk factors are at the highest risk of short- and medium-term mortality following ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Vickram Vijay Anand, Jaycie Koh, Tobias Teo, Yip Han Chin, Rishabh Mahesh, Mark Y Chan, Gemma A Figtree, Nicholas W S Chew\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analysis investigates the sex differences in mortality risk between the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) and those with at least one standard modifiable risk factor (SMuRF), and analyses mortality rates between males and females within the SMuRF-less cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies with sex-stratified outcomes for SMuRF-less versus SMuRF patients with ACS till 15 December 2023. The analysis of variables reported in proportions was carried out by utilizing a meta-analysis with a generalized linear mixed model while continuous variables were analyzed by a meta-analysis of means, using an inverse variance method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included in the current paper, with 82,395 SMuRF-less ACS patients and 607,558 SMuRF ACS patients. Excess in-hospital mortality found in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, were only observed in females (RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.08-2.25, p = 0.029), but not in males (RR 1.59, 95%CI 0.90-2.80, p = 0.088). On longer follow-up, the 1- and 2-year post-ACS mortality rates were similar across the SMuRF-less and SMuRF cohorts, for both sexes. The subgroup analysis of SMuRF-less ACS individuals revealed that SMuRF-less females had higher in-hospital (RR 1.52, 95%CI 1.30-1.78, p = 0.002), 1-year (RR 1.51, 95%CI 1.34-1.71, p = 0.005) and 2-year mortality risks (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.13-1.75, p = 0.016) compared to the SMuRF-less male counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paradoxical excess mortality in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, was only observed in females. Females without cardiovascular risk factors are at the highest risk of short- and medium-term mortality following ACS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本荟萃分析调查了无标准可改变风险因素(SMuRF-less)和至少有一个标准可改变风险因素(SMuRF)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者死亡率风险的性别差异,并分析了SMuRF-less队列中男性和女性的死亡率:在MEDLINE和Embase数据库中检索了截至2023年12月15日对无SMuRF和有SMuRF的ACS患者进行性别分层的队列研究。采用广义线性混合模型进行荟萃分析,对以比例报告的变量进行分析,同时采用逆方差法对连续变量进行均值荟萃分析:本文共纳入了八项研究,包括82 395例无SMuRF的ACS患者和607 558例SMuRF的ACS患者。与有SMuRFs的ACS患者相比,无SMuRF的ACS患者的院内死亡率仅在女性中观察到过高(RR 1.56,95%CI 1.08-2.25,p = 0.029),而在男性中未观察到过高(RR 1.59,95%CI 0.90-2.80,p = 0.088)。在较长时间的随访中,无SMuRF队列和SMuRF队列的男女ACS后1年和2年死亡率相似。对无SMuRF的ACS患者进行的亚组分析显示,与无SMuRF的男性患者相比,无SMuRF的女性患者的院内死亡率(RR 1.52,95%CI 1.30-1.78,p = 0.002)、1年死亡率(RR 1.51,95%CI 1.34-1.71,p = 0.005)和2年死亡率(RR 1.40,95%CI 1.13-1.75,p = 0.016)更高:结论:与有SMuRFs的ACS相比,无SMuRFs的ACS死亡率超常仅在女性中观察到。无心血管风险因素的女性在发生 ACS 后的短期和中期死亡率风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.

Purpose: This meta-analysis investigates the sex differences in mortality risk between the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) and those with at least one standard modifiable risk factor (SMuRF), and analyses mortality rates between males and females within the SMuRF-less cohort.

Methods: The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies with sex-stratified outcomes for SMuRF-less versus SMuRF patients with ACS till 15 December 2023. The analysis of variables reported in proportions was carried out by utilizing a meta-analysis with a generalized linear mixed model while continuous variables were analyzed by a meta-analysis of means, using an inverse variance method.

Results: Eight studies were included in the current paper, with 82,395 SMuRF-less ACS patients and 607,558 SMuRF ACS patients. Excess in-hospital mortality found in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, were only observed in females (RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.08-2.25, p = 0.029), but not in males (RR 1.59, 95%CI 0.90-2.80, p = 0.088). On longer follow-up, the 1- and 2-year post-ACS mortality rates were similar across the SMuRF-less and SMuRF cohorts, for both sexes. The subgroup analysis of SMuRF-less ACS individuals revealed that SMuRF-less females had higher in-hospital (RR 1.52, 95%CI 1.30-1.78, p = 0.002), 1-year (RR 1.51, 95%CI 1.34-1.71, p = 0.005) and 2-year mortality risks (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.13-1.75, p = 0.016) compared to the SMuRF-less male counterparts.

Conclusion: Paradoxical excess mortality in SMuRF-less ACS, compared to those with SMuRFs, was only observed in females. Females without cardiovascular risk factors are at the highest risk of short- and medium-term mortality following ACS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
A call for high-intensity lipid-lowering treatment of ASCVD patients diagnosed by coronary computed tomography angiography: lessons from the multi-center LOCATE study. Dual pathway inhibition in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in clinical practice in Germany: results from the German CAD subgroup of the XATOA Registry. Inflammation, Lp(a) and cardiovascular mortality: results from the LURIC study. Letter to the editor: "Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals myocardial involvement in patients with active stage of inflammatory bowel disease". Response to the Letter to the editor: "cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals myocardial involvement in patients with active stage of inflammatory bowel disease" (CRCD-D-24-01694).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1