在中国慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗与布地奈德/富马酸福莫特罗疗效相似:FORSYYN 双盲随机研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1080/15412555.2024.2425157
Fuqiang Wen, Yanmin Wu, Chunyan Xing, Yingqun Zhu, Yongxing Chen, Xiaodong Mei, Massimo Corradi, Glauco Cappellini, Emanuele Calabro, Sergio Amodio, Cissy Zhu, Dmitry Galkin
{"title":"在中国慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗与布地奈德/富马酸福莫特罗疗效相似:FORSYYN 双盲随机研究。","authors":"Fuqiang Wen, Yanmin Wu, Chunyan Xing, Yingqun Zhu, Yongxing Chen, Xiaodong Mei, Massimo Corradi, Glauco Cappellini, Emanuele Calabro, Sergio Amodio, Cissy Zhu, Dmitry Galkin","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2024.2425157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) delivered <i>via</i> pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) has demonstrated efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in studies predominantly conducted in Caucasian adults. The current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD, as part of registration for COPD in China. This double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with COPD of Chinese ethnicity aged ≥40 years. After a 4-week open-label budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/FF) run-in period, patients were randomised to BUD/FF or BDP/FF for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of BDP/FF to BUD/FF in terms of change from baseline in pre-dose morning forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV<sub>1</sub>) at Week 24 (i.e. the lower 95% CI limit of the difference was above the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -0.07 L). Of 750 patients randomised (377 BDP/FF; 373 BUD/FF), 87.6% completed the study. The primary endpoint was met in both the per-protocol (adjusted mean difference -0.001 L [95% CI: -0.025, 0.022], non-inferiority <i>p</i> < 0.001) and intention-to-treat populations (-0.001 L [-0.024, 0.022]; non-inferiority <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no statistically significant BDP/FF-BUD/FF differences for the secondary endpoints, and a similar proportion of patients had adverse events (BDP/FF, 51.7%; BUD/FF, 51.2%), with most mild/moderate in severity. In conclusion, BDP/FF pMDI was non-inferior to BUD/FF in terms of pre-dose morning FEV<sub>1</sub>, supported by a range of secondary endpoints. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. The study supports the use of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>China Centre for Drug Evaluation (CTR20180475).</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"21 1","pages":"2425157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate is Similarly Effective to Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate in Chinese Patients with COPD: The FORSYYN Double-Blind, Randomised Study.\",\"authors\":\"Fuqiang Wen, Yanmin Wu, Chunyan Xing, Yingqun Zhu, Yongxing Chen, Xiaodong Mei, Massimo Corradi, Glauco Cappellini, Emanuele Calabro, Sergio Amodio, Cissy Zhu, Dmitry Galkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15412555.2024.2425157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) delivered <i>via</i> pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) has demonstrated efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in studies predominantly conducted in Caucasian adults. The current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD, as part of registration for COPD in China. This double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with COPD of Chinese ethnicity aged ≥40 years. After a 4-week open-label budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/FF) run-in period, patients were randomised to BUD/FF or BDP/FF for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of BDP/FF to BUD/FF in terms of change from baseline in pre-dose morning forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV<sub>1</sub>) at Week 24 (i.e. the lower 95% CI limit of the difference was above the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -0.07 L). Of 750 patients randomised (377 BDP/FF; 373 BUD/FF), 87.6% completed the study. The primary endpoint was met in both the per-protocol (adjusted mean difference -0.001 L [95% CI: -0.025, 0.022], non-inferiority <i>p</i> < 0.001) and intention-to-treat populations (-0.001 L [-0.024, 0.022]; non-inferiority <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no statistically significant BDP/FF-BUD/FF differences for the secondary endpoints, and a similar proportion of patients had adverse events (BDP/FF, 51.7%; BUD/FF, 51.2%), with most mild/moderate in severity. In conclusion, BDP/FF pMDI was non-inferior to BUD/FF in terms of pre-dose morning FEV<sub>1</sub>, supported by a range of secondary endpoints. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. The study supports the use of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>China Centre for Drug Evaluation (CTR20180475).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"2425157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2024.2425157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2024.2425157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过加压计量吸入器(pMDI)给药的固定剂量二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗(BDP/FF)复方制剂在慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)中的疗效已得到证实,这些研究主要是在白种成人中进行的。本研究评估了 BDP/FF pMDI 在中国慢性阻塞性肺病患者中的疗效和安全性,作为慢性阻塞性肺病在中国注册的一部分。这项双盲、双哑药、随机、平行组研究在年龄≥40 岁的中国慢性阻塞性肺病患者中进行。经过为期4周的布地奈德/富马酸福莫特罗(BUD/FF)开放标签试运行期后,患者被随机分配到BUD/FF或BDP/FF治疗24周。主要目标是证明在第24周时,BDP/FF与BUD/FF相比,在用药前晨起1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)与基线相比的变化方面不存在劣效性(即差异的95% CI下限高于预先设定的-0.07 L的非劣效性边际)。在 750 名随机患者中(377 名 BDP/FF;373 名 BUD/FF),87.6% 的患者完成了研究。在一系列次要终点的支持下,两种方案均达到了主要终点(调整后的平均差异为-0.001升[95% CI:-0.025,0.022],非劣效性p p 1)。两种疗法的耐受性相似。该研究支持在中国慢性阻塞性肺病患者中使用 BDP/FF pMDI:研究注册:中国药品审评中心(CTR20180475)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate is Similarly Effective to Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate in Chinese Patients with COPD: The FORSYYN Double-Blind, Randomised Study.

The fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) delivered via pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) has demonstrated efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in studies predominantly conducted in Caucasian adults. The current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD, as part of registration for COPD in China. This double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with COPD of Chinese ethnicity aged ≥40 years. After a 4-week open-label budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/FF) run-in period, patients were randomised to BUD/FF or BDP/FF for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of BDP/FF to BUD/FF in terms of change from baseline in pre-dose morning forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at Week 24 (i.e. the lower 95% CI limit of the difference was above the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -0.07 L). Of 750 patients randomised (377 BDP/FF; 373 BUD/FF), 87.6% completed the study. The primary endpoint was met in both the per-protocol (adjusted mean difference -0.001 L [95% CI: -0.025, 0.022], non-inferiority p < 0.001) and intention-to-treat populations (-0.001 L [-0.024, 0.022]; non-inferiority p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant BDP/FF-BUD/FF differences for the secondary endpoints, and a similar proportion of patients had adverse events (BDP/FF, 51.7%; BUD/FF, 51.2%), with most mild/moderate in severity. In conclusion, BDP/FF pMDI was non-inferior to BUD/FF in terms of pre-dose morning FEV1, supported by a range of secondary endpoints. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. The study supports the use of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD.

Study registration: China Centre for Drug Evaluation (CTR20180475).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
期刊最新文献
Biologic Therapies for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Granzyme B May Act as an Effector Molecule to Control the Inflammatory Process in COPD. Guidelines for the Pharmacologic Treatment of COPD 2023: Canada versus GOLD. The Role of Bioactive Small Molecules in COPD Pathogenesis. Assessment of the Relationship Between Genetic Determinants of Obesity, Unhealthy Eating Habits and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Mendelian Randomisation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1