{"title":"用于西澳大利亚青少年筛查和诊断的优势与困难问卷的有效性。","authors":"Carolyn Maxwell, Elaine Chapman, Stephen Houghton","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14212433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used 25-item screening and diagnostic tool for behavioral and emotional problems in young people. Despite its popularity, evaluations of the SDQ's factor structure in adolescent populations have produced disparate results, and its relationships with theoretically related variables are rarely evaluated. In the present study, these two elements of validity were evaluated based on a large sample of Western Australian adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 1489 adolescents, <i>n</i> = 623 males with a mean age of 13.79 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.61) and <i>n</i> = 866 females, with a mean age of 14.29 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.51). Participants completed the SDQ alongside measures of loneliness, sense of belonging, depression, bullying, and diagnostic status to evaluate its internal structure and correlations with theoretically related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analyses supported the internal structure of the SDQ both for males and for females. Relationships between the SDQ subscale scores and those from theoretically related variables were also aligned with the instrument's underpinning framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the somewhat disparate results of previous studies, overall, this study supported the validity of the SDQ for use in the Western Australian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn Maxwell, Elaine Chapman, Stephen Houghton\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics14212433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used 25-item screening and diagnostic tool for behavioral and emotional problems in young people. Despite its popularity, evaluations of the SDQ's factor structure in adolescent populations have produced disparate results, and its relationships with theoretically related variables are rarely evaluated. In the present study, these two elements of validity were evaluated based on a large sample of Western Australian adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 1489 adolescents, <i>n</i> = 623 males with a mean age of 13.79 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.61) and <i>n</i> = 866 females, with a mean age of 14.29 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.51). Participants completed the SDQ alongside measures of loneliness, sense of belonging, depression, bullying, and diagnostic status to evaluate its internal structure and correlations with theoretically related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analyses supported the internal structure of the SDQ both for males and for females. Relationships between the SDQ subscale scores and those from theoretically related variables were also aligned with the instrument's underpinning framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the somewhat disparate results of previous studies, overall, this study supported the validity of the SDQ for use in the Western Australian context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"14 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545116/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents.
Background/objectives: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used 25-item screening and diagnostic tool for behavioral and emotional problems in young people. Despite its popularity, evaluations of the SDQ's factor structure in adolescent populations have produced disparate results, and its relationships with theoretically related variables are rarely evaluated. In the present study, these two elements of validity were evaluated based on a large sample of Western Australian adolescents.
Methods: Participants were 1489 adolescents, n = 623 males with a mean age of 13.79 years (SD = 1.61) and n = 866 females, with a mean age of 14.29 years (SD = 1.51). Participants completed the SDQ alongside measures of loneliness, sense of belonging, depression, bullying, and diagnostic status to evaluate its internal structure and correlations with theoretically related variables.
Results: Confirmatory factor analyses supported the internal structure of the SDQ both for males and for females. Relationships between the SDQ subscale scores and those from theoretically related variables were also aligned with the instrument's underpinning framework.
Conclusions: Despite the somewhat disparate results of previous studies, overall, this study supported the validity of the SDQ for use in the Western Australian context.
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.