结肠胶囊内窥镜检查中的非肿瘤性发现:额外收益

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-11-07 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2438-7223
Sebastian Radic Eskemose, Lasse Kaalby, Ulrik Deding, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer
{"title":"结肠胶囊内窥镜检查中的非肿瘤性发现:额外收益","authors":"Sebastian Radic Eskemose, Lasse Kaalby, Ulrik Deding, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer","doi":"10.1055/a-2438-7223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Despite the common occurrence of non-neoplastic findings (NNFs) in individuals with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT), few studies have reported on these findings. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of colonic NNFs in three cohorts of Danish clinical trial participants who underwent colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). <b>Patients and methods</b> Retrospectively collecting NNFs from CCE reports of three Danish trials, we classified them into five categories: diverticula, vascular abnormalities, inflammation, erosions/ulcerations, and others. The statistical analysis included 516 participants from three trials, with a mean age ranging from 59.2 to 63.9 years. The participants in the three trials were FIT-positive screening or symptomatic individuals. <b>Results</b> NNFs were reported in more than half of the CCE procedures (50.6% to 77.9%), with colonic diverticula being the most common NNF appearing in 40.9% to 66.9% of the CCE reports. Vascular abnormalities and erosions/ulcerations were also common depending on the specific trial. <b>Conclusions</b> NNFs are common and may be an indicator of more widespread disease. Furthermore, NNFs may develop into clinically significant conditions despite their benign appearance. This paper expands on the limited literature about prevalence of NNFs and underscores the additional value of CCE video recordings beyond detecting polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"E1295-E1302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-neoplastic findings in colon capsule endoscopy: Additional yield.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Radic Eskemose, Lasse Kaalby, Ulrik Deding, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2438-7223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Despite the common occurrence of non-neoplastic findings (NNFs) in individuals with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT), few studies have reported on these findings. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of colonic NNFs in three cohorts of Danish clinical trial participants who underwent colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). <b>Patients and methods</b> Retrospectively collecting NNFs from CCE reports of three Danish trials, we classified them into five categories: diverticula, vascular abnormalities, inflammation, erosions/ulcerations, and others. The statistical analysis included 516 participants from three trials, with a mean age ranging from 59.2 to 63.9 years. The participants in the three trials were FIT-positive screening or symptomatic individuals. <b>Results</b> NNFs were reported in more than half of the CCE procedures (50.6% to 77.9%), with colonic diverticula being the most common NNF appearing in 40.9% to 66.9% of the CCE reports. Vascular abnormalities and erosions/ulcerations were also common depending on the specific trial. <b>Conclusions</b> NNFs are common and may be an indicator of more widespread disease. Furthermore, NNFs may develop into clinically significant conditions despite their benign appearance. This paper expands on the limited literature about prevalence of NNFs and underscores the additional value of CCE video recordings beyond detecting polyps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"E1295-E1302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543286/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2438-7223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2438-7223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 尽管粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)呈阳性的人常出现非肿瘤性结果(NNFs),但很少有研究报告过这些结果。这项横断面研究旨在确定接受结肠胶囊内镜检查(CCE)的三组丹麦临床试验参与者中结肠非肿瘤性结果的发生率。患者和方法 我们从三项丹麦试验的 CCE 报告中回顾性地收集了 NNFs,并将其分为五类:憩室、血管异常、炎症、糜烂/溃疡和其他。统计分析包括来自三项试验的 516 名参与者,他们的平均年龄在 59.2 岁至 63.9 岁之间。三项试验的参与者均为 FIT 阳性筛查者或有症状者。结果 半数以上(50.6% 至 77.9%)的 CCE 程序报告了非结肠憩室,结肠憩室是最常见的非结肠憩室,出现在 40.9% 至 66.9% 的 CCE 报告中。血管异常和糜烂/溃疡也很常见,这取决于具体的试验。结论 NNFs很常见,可能是更广泛疾病的指标。此外,尽管 NNFs 看上去是良性的,但也可能发展成具有临床意义的病症。本文对有关 NNFs 发病率的有限文献进行了扩展,并强调了 CCE 视频记录在检测息肉之外的其他价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-neoplastic findings in colon capsule endoscopy: Additional yield.

Background and study aims Despite the common occurrence of non-neoplastic findings (NNFs) in individuals with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT), few studies have reported on these findings. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of colonic NNFs in three cohorts of Danish clinical trial participants who underwent colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). Patients and methods Retrospectively collecting NNFs from CCE reports of three Danish trials, we classified them into five categories: diverticula, vascular abnormalities, inflammation, erosions/ulcerations, and others. The statistical analysis included 516 participants from three trials, with a mean age ranging from 59.2 to 63.9 years. The participants in the three trials were FIT-positive screening or symptomatic individuals. Results NNFs were reported in more than half of the CCE procedures (50.6% to 77.9%), with colonic diverticula being the most common NNF appearing in 40.9% to 66.9% of the CCE reports. Vascular abnormalities and erosions/ulcerations were also common depending on the specific trial. Conclusions NNFs are common and may be an indicator of more widespread disease. Furthermore, NNFs may develop into clinically significant conditions despite their benign appearance. This paper expands on the limited literature about prevalence of NNFs and underscores the additional value of CCE video recordings beyond detecting polyps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1