Anna Evans Phillips, Jefferson N Brownell, Alyssa Tindall, Bridget Dowd Kiernan, Dhiren Patel, Daniel Gelfond, Virginia A Stallings
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂与囊性纤维化和胰腺功能不全患者的脂肪吸收:随机交叉试验。","authors":"Anna Evans Phillips, Jefferson N Brownell, Alyssa Tindall, Bridget Dowd Kiernan, Dhiren Patel, Daniel Gelfond, Virginia A Stallings","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08728-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary fat malabsorption contributes to poor nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Prescribing gastric acid-reducing agents such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) to improve dietary fat absorption has been accepted in clinical practice despite limited evidence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This was a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of subjects aged 12 and older with CF and EPI assessed on placebo and omeprazole to determine if PPI improved the efficacy of PERT as indicated by measures of dietary fat absorption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fat malabsorption via stool coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) and malabsorption blood test (MBT), gastrointestinal pH (wireless motility capsule [WMC]), and quality of life (QOL) were assessed after 14 days on both placebo or PPI (omeprazole).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 19 subjects enrolled, 13 were randomized, and 9 provided paired results on placebo and PPI. The 3 subject results for CFA were as follows: 1 increased, 1 decreased, and 1 was within the reference range in both tests for fat absorption. For 9 MBT subjects, 7 decreased and 2 increased fat absorption. For the 4 WMC studies, no change in transit times, nor in pH profiles were noted. No differences were seen in the domains of the two QOL questionnaires comparing placebo and PPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These limited descriptive pilot study results in participants with CF and EPI on PERT evaluated by stool, blood, and QOL tests did not suggest improvement in fat absorption attributable to PPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Fat Absorption in Cystic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Evans Phillips, Jefferson N Brownell, Alyssa Tindall, Bridget Dowd Kiernan, Dhiren Patel, Daniel Gelfond, Virginia A Stallings\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08728-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary fat malabsorption contributes to poor nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Prescribing gastric acid-reducing agents such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) to improve dietary fat absorption has been accepted in clinical practice despite limited evidence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This was a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of subjects aged 12 and older with CF and EPI assessed on placebo and omeprazole to determine if PPI improved the efficacy of PERT as indicated by measures of dietary fat absorption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fat malabsorption via stool coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) and malabsorption blood test (MBT), gastrointestinal pH (wireless motility capsule [WMC]), and quality of life (QOL) were assessed after 14 days on both placebo or PPI (omeprazole).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 19 subjects enrolled, 13 were randomized, and 9 provided paired results on placebo and PPI. The 3 subject results for CFA were as follows: 1 increased, 1 decreased, and 1 was within the reference range in both tests for fat absorption. For 9 MBT subjects, 7 decreased and 2 increased fat absorption. For the 4 WMC studies, no change in transit times, nor in pH profiles were noted. No differences were seen in the domains of the two QOL questionnaires comparing placebo and PPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These limited descriptive pilot study results in participants with CF and EPI on PERT evaluated by stool, blood, and QOL tests did not suggest improvement in fat absorption attributable to PPI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08728-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08728-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:饮食脂肪吸收不良导致囊性纤维化(CF)和胰腺外分泌功能不全(EPI)患者营养状况不良。目的:这是一项试验性随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验,受试者年龄在 12 岁及以上,患有囊性纤维化和胰腺外分泌功能不全(EPI),并接受过安慰剂和奥美拉唑治疗,以确定 PPI 是否能改善 PERT 的疗效(根据膳食脂肪吸收指标来判断):方法:服用安慰剂或PPI(奥美拉唑)14天后,通过粪便脂肪吸收系数(CFA)和吸收不良血液测试(MBT)评估脂肪吸收不良情况、胃肠道pH值(无线蠕动胶囊[WMC])和生活质量(QOL):共有 19 名受试者参加,13 人被随机分配,9 人提供了安慰剂和 PPI 的配对结果。3名受试者的CFA结果如下:1 人增加,1 人减少,1 人在两次脂肪吸收测试中均在参考范围内。9 名 MBT 受试者中,7 人脂肪吸收减少,2 人脂肪吸收增加。在 4 项 WMC 研究中,没有发现转运时间或 pH 值变化。在两份 QOL 问卷中,对安慰剂和 PPI 进行比较后发现两者在各方面均无差异:这些有限的描述性试点研究结果是通过粪便、血液和 QOL 测试评估 PERT 中 CF 和 EPI 患者的情况,并不表明 PPI 可改善脂肪吸收。
Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Fat Absorption in Cystic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.
Background: Dietary fat malabsorption contributes to poor nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Prescribing gastric acid-reducing agents such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) to improve dietary fat absorption has been accepted in clinical practice despite limited evidence.
Aims: This was a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of subjects aged 12 and older with CF and EPI assessed on placebo and omeprazole to determine if PPI improved the efficacy of PERT as indicated by measures of dietary fat absorption.
Methods: Fat malabsorption via stool coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) and malabsorption blood test (MBT), gastrointestinal pH (wireless motility capsule [WMC]), and quality of life (QOL) were assessed after 14 days on both placebo or PPI (omeprazole).
Results: Total 19 subjects enrolled, 13 were randomized, and 9 provided paired results on placebo and PPI. The 3 subject results for CFA were as follows: 1 increased, 1 decreased, and 1 was within the reference range in both tests for fat absorption. For 9 MBT subjects, 7 decreased and 2 increased fat absorption. For the 4 WMC studies, no change in transit times, nor in pH profiles were noted. No differences were seen in the domains of the two QOL questionnaires comparing placebo and PPI.
Conclusions: These limited descriptive pilot study results in participants with CF and EPI on PERT evaluated by stool, blood, and QOL tests did not suggest improvement in fat absorption attributable to PPI.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.