Piero Perucca, Dina Battino, Rebecca Bromley, Lei Chen, John Craig, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Lewis B Holmes, Kiren G Koshy, Kimford J Meador, Ramshekhar N Menon, Terence J O'Brien, Page B Pennell, Dong Zhou, Torbjörn Tomson
{"title":"癫痫-怀孕登记:更新。","authors":"Piero Perucca, Dina Battino, Rebecca Bromley, Lei Chen, John Craig, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Lewis B Holmes, Kiren G Koshy, Kimford J Meador, Ramshekhar N Menon, Terence J O'Brien, Page B Pennell, Dong Zhou, Torbjörn Tomson","doi":"10.1111/epi.18180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report is the first comprehensive update on the activities of existing epilepsy-pregnancy registries since 2010. The primary aim of these registries, which were initiated by independent international research groups some 25 years ago, has been to assess the risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in offspring exposed in utero to different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Progress reports are provided here from the five original registries (the International Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy EURAP, the North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry, the UK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register, the Kerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy, and the Raoul Wallenberg Australian Pregnancy Register of Antiepileptic Drugs) plus the more recently initiated West China Registry. Since their inception, the registries have published a wealth of data revealing important differences in risks across the most frequently used ASM treatments, thereby facilitating rational management of women with epilepsy who are of childbearing potential. Although the number of pregnancies enrolled in the different registries has more than doubled since the 2010 report, many questions remain. These include outcomes following prenatal exposure to most of the newer ASMs or different ASM combinations, as well as associations with specific MCMs rather than MCMs as a collective. All the registries, therefore, remain active and continue to enroll pregnancies. Administrative health care databases have been utilized more recently for the assessment of MCM risks and other adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in utero exposure to ASMs. Although these can provide population-based complementary information, they cannot replace the specific epilepsy-pregnancy registries with their more detailed validated individual information. Given the multiple newer ASMs that are increasingly used and the continuing multiple knowledge gaps for the older ASMs, epilepsy-pregnancy registries will continue to play an important role in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epilepsy-pregnancy registries: An update.\",\"authors\":\"Piero Perucca, Dina Battino, Rebecca Bromley, Lei Chen, John Craig, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Lewis B Holmes, Kiren G Koshy, Kimford J Meador, Ramshekhar N Menon, Terence J O'Brien, Page B Pennell, Dong Zhou, Torbjörn Tomson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This report is the first comprehensive update on the activities of existing epilepsy-pregnancy registries since 2010. The primary aim of these registries, which were initiated by independent international research groups some 25 years ago, has been to assess the risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in offspring exposed in utero to different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Progress reports are provided here from the five original registries (the International Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy EURAP, the North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry, the UK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register, the Kerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy, and the Raoul Wallenberg Australian Pregnancy Register of Antiepileptic Drugs) plus the more recently initiated West China Registry. Since their inception, the registries have published a wealth of data revealing important differences in risks across the most frequently used ASM treatments, thereby facilitating rational management of women with epilepsy who are of childbearing potential. Although the number of pregnancies enrolled in the different registries has more than doubled since the 2010 report, many questions remain. These include outcomes following prenatal exposure to most of the newer ASMs or different ASM combinations, as well as associations with specific MCMs rather than MCMs as a collective. All the registries, therefore, remain active and continue to enroll pregnancies. Administrative health care databases have been utilized more recently for the assessment of MCM risks and other adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in utero exposure to ASMs. Although these can provide population-based complementary information, they cannot replace the specific epilepsy-pregnancy registries with their more detailed validated individual information. Given the multiple newer ASMs that are increasingly used and the continuing multiple knowledge gaps for the older ASMs, epilepsy-pregnancy registries will continue to play an important role in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18180\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18180","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
This report is the first comprehensive update on the activities of existing epilepsy-pregnancy registries since 2010. The primary aim of these registries, which were initiated by independent international research groups some 25 years ago, has been to assess the risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in offspring exposed in utero to different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Progress reports are provided here from the five original registries (the International Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy EURAP, the North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry, the UK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register, the Kerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy, and the Raoul Wallenberg Australian Pregnancy Register of Antiepileptic Drugs) plus the more recently initiated West China Registry. Since their inception, the registries have published a wealth of data revealing important differences in risks across the most frequently used ASM treatments, thereby facilitating rational management of women with epilepsy who are of childbearing potential. Although the number of pregnancies enrolled in the different registries has more than doubled since the 2010 report, many questions remain. These include outcomes following prenatal exposure to most of the newer ASMs or different ASM combinations, as well as associations with specific MCMs rather than MCMs as a collective. All the registries, therefore, remain active and continue to enroll pregnancies. Administrative health care databases have been utilized more recently for the assessment of MCM risks and other adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in utero exposure to ASMs. Although these can provide population-based complementary information, they cannot replace the specific epilepsy-pregnancy registries with their more detailed validated individual information. Given the multiple newer ASMs that are increasingly used and the continuing multiple knowledge gaps for the older ASMs, epilepsy-pregnancy registries will continue to play an important role in the future.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.