微波消融:与其他热消融方式治疗良性和恶性甲状腺结节的技术和临床比较。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Gland surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-221
Xinyi Luo, Emad Kandil
{"title":"微波消融:与其他热消融方式治疗良性和恶性甲状腺结节的技术和临床比较。","authors":"Xinyi Luo, Emad Kandil","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microwave ablation (MWA) is a novel modality for thermal ablation (TA) to treat benign and malignant thyroid nodules, mostly papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Compared to surgery, TA is less invasive and less painful, has faster recovery, better cosmetic outcomes, and fewer complications. TA techniques have been evolving over the past decade to be more energy efficient, precise, and produce long-lasting results. The general approach is similar between various TA techniques. However, each technique has uniqueness in its energy delivery and, thus, risk profile and outcomes. MWA has a few critical technical differences that make it safer for patients with surgical implants and cardiac comorbidities. It has proven effective in treating benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) in adults and pediatric populations with benign and malignant lesions. The clinical and theoretical outcomes of MWA compared to other thermal ablative techniques, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA), have been investigated in some studies and meta-analyses. Minimally invasive procedures such as MWA are an important tool for the management of thyroid lesions. Thus, it is crucial for clinicians to be equipped with the knowledge to use these tools. In this review, we provide a clinical review detailing the technical differences and clinical outcomes for the three major TA techniques-MWA, RFA, and LA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"13 10","pages":"1805-1813"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microwave ablation: a technical and clinical comparison to other thermal ablation modalities to treat benign and malignant thyroid nodules.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyi Luo, Emad Kandil\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/gs-24-221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Microwave ablation (MWA) is a novel modality for thermal ablation (TA) to treat benign and malignant thyroid nodules, mostly papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Compared to surgery, TA is less invasive and less painful, has faster recovery, better cosmetic outcomes, and fewer complications. TA techniques have been evolving over the past decade to be more energy efficient, precise, and produce long-lasting results. The general approach is similar between various TA techniques. However, each technique has uniqueness in its energy delivery and, thus, risk profile and outcomes. MWA has a few critical technical differences that make it safer for patients with surgical implants and cardiac comorbidities. It has proven effective in treating benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) in adults and pediatric populations with benign and malignant lesions. The clinical and theoretical outcomes of MWA compared to other thermal ablative techniques, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA), have been investigated in some studies and meta-analyses. Minimally invasive procedures such as MWA are an important tool for the management of thyroid lesions. Thus, it is crucial for clinicians to be equipped with the knowledge to use these tools. In this review, we provide a clinical review detailing the technical differences and clinical outcomes for the three major TA techniques-MWA, RFA, and LA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gland surgery\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"1805-1813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gland surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-221\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微波消融(MWA)是一种治疗良性和恶性甲状腺结节(主要是甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC))的新型热消融(TA)方式。与手术相比,TA创伤小、痛苦少、恢复快、美容效果好、并发症少。近十年来,TA技术不断发展,能量效率更高、更精确、效果更持久。各种 TA 技术的一般方法是相似的。然而,每种技术在能量传递方面都有其独特性,因此风险状况和效果也不尽相同。MWA 在技术上有一些关键的不同之处,使其对有手术植入物和心脏合并症的患者更加安全。事实证明,它能有效治疗成人和儿童良性和恶性甲状腺结节(BTN)。一些研究和荟萃分析已对 MWA 与其他热消融技术(如射频消融(RFA)和激光消融(LA))相比的临床和理论效果进行了调查。MWA等微创手术是治疗甲状腺病变的重要手段。因此,临床医生掌握使用这些工具的知识至关重要。在这篇综述中,我们详细介绍了三种主要TA技术--MWA、RFA和LA的技术差异和临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microwave ablation: a technical and clinical comparison to other thermal ablation modalities to treat benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Microwave ablation (MWA) is a novel modality for thermal ablation (TA) to treat benign and malignant thyroid nodules, mostly papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Compared to surgery, TA is less invasive and less painful, has faster recovery, better cosmetic outcomes, and fewer complications. TA techniques have been evolving over the past decade to be more energy efficient, precise, and produce long-lasting results. The general approach is similar between various TA techniques. However, each technique has uniqueness in its energy delivery and, thus, risk profile and outcomes. MWA has a few critical technical differences that make it safer for patients with surgical implants and cardiac comorbidities. It has proven effective in treating benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) in adults and pediatric populations with benign and malignant lesions. The clinical and theoretical outcomes of MWA compared to other thermal ablative techniques, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA), have been investigated in some studies and meta-analyses. Minimally invasive procedures such as MWA are an important tool for the management of thyroid lesions. Thus, it is crucial for clinicians to be equipped with the knowledge to use these tools. In this review, we provide a clinical review detailing the technical differences and clinical outcomes for the three major TA techniques-MWA, RFA, and LA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative approach and technical considerations in parotid surgery. Preparation and characterization of a rat uterine decellularized scaffold. Propensity analysis reveals survival disparities between T1a and T1b well-differentiated thyroid cancer based on surgery. Repeat breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for in breast tumor recurrence after initial BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ. Risk factors for increased drain output after endoscopic thyroidectomy via areola approach: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1