2010 年至 2022 年晚期直肠癌患者生活质量的变化。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.3390/healthcare12212108
Ailina Doelz, Daniel Blasko, Claudia Schweizer, Tim Fitz, Annett Kallies, Rainer Fietkau, Luitpold Distel
{"title":"2010 年至 2022 年晚期直肠癌患者生活质量的变化。","authors":"Ailina Doelz, Daniel Blasko, Claudia Schweizer, Tim Fitz, Annett Kallies, Rainer Fietkau, Luitpold Distel","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12212108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Advanced rectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and has a significant impact on public health. Because favorable and long-term survival has been achieved with multimodal therapy, patient quality of life is very important. The intention of this study was to assess patients' quality of life using various functioning and symptom scores from the years 2010 to 2022 and to examine changes over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on health-related quality of life were collected from rectal cancer patients treated at the University Hospital Erlangen in Germany over a period of 13 years. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the rectal cancer-specific module QLQ-CR38 were completed in this study by a total of 516 patients. The questionnaires were collected before, during and at annual follow-up visits after treatment. Statistical significance was defined as <i>p</i>-values < 0.05 as well as a difference of 10 or more percentage points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The deterioration in scores is most pronounced immediately after radiochemotherapy, especially for pain (+19.8 pp), fatigue (+16.1 pp) and diarrhoea (+24.8 pp). One year after the end of therapy, most of the values are again comparable to or better than those of the German general population and only role functioning (-19.8 pp), social functioning (-24.6 pp), diarrhoea (-21.6 pp) and financial difficulties (-16.3 pp) are considerably worse. Some baselines deteriorate clearly over time from 2010 to 2022; these are role functioning (-23.9 pp), social functioning (-17.3 pp), body image (-15.2 pp), fatigue (+13.8 pp) and nausea and vomiting (+10.5 pp).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An improvement in therapy in terms of a reduction in side effects and, thus, an improvement in quality of life over time could not be proven. The deterioration in individual scores over time does not appear to be a problem specific to rectal cancer patients, but rather, is associated with social developments or systemic healthcare factors in German society that are not directly related to oncological diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"12 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Rectal Cancer Between 2010 and 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Ailina Doelz, Daniel Blasko, Claudia Schweizer, Tim Fitz, Annett Kallies, Rainer Fietkau, Luitpold Distel\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare12212108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Advanced rectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and has a significant impact on public health. Because favorable and long-term survival has been achieved with multimodal therapy, patient quality of life is very important. The intention of this study was to assess patients' quality of life using various functioning and symptom scores from the years 2010 to 2022 and to examine changes over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on health-related quality of life were collected from rectal cancer patients treated at the University Hospital Erlangen in Germany over a period of 13 years. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the rectal cancer-specific module QLQ-CR38 were completed in this study by a total of 516 patients. The questionnaires were collected before, during and at annual follow-up visits after treatment. Statistical significance was defined as <i>p</i>-values < 0.05 as well as a difference of 10 or more percentage points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The deterioration in scores is most pronounced immediately after radiochemotherapy, especially for pain (+19.8 pp), fatigue (+16.1 pp) and diarrhoea (+24.8 pp). One year after the end of therapy, most of the values are again comparable to or better than those of the German general population and only role functioning (-19.8 pp), social functioning (-24.6 pp), diarrhoea (-21.6 pp) and financial difficulties (-16.3 pp) are considerably worse. Some baselines deteriorate clearly over time from 2010 to 2022; these are role functioning (-23.9 pp), social functioning (-17.3 pp), body image (-15.2 pp), fatigue (+13.8 pp) and nausea and vomiting (+10.5 pp).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An improvement in therapy in terms of a reduction in side effects and, thus, an improvement in quality of life over time could not be proven. The deterioration in individual scores over time does not appear to be a problem specific to rectal cancer patients, but rather, is associated with social developments or systemic healthcare factors in German society that are not directly related to oncological diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"12 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544860/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:晚期直肠癌是全球最常见的癌症之一,对公众健康有重大影响。由于采用多模式疗法可以获得良好的长期生存,因此患者的生活质量非常重要。本研究的目的是利用 2010 年至 2022 年期间的各种功能和症状评分来评估患者的生活质量,并研究随时间推移发生的变化:方法:从德国埃尔兰根大学医院接受治疗的直肠癌患者中收集了 13 年来与健康相关的生活质量数据。共有 516 名患者填写了 EORTC QLQ-C30 问卷和直肠癌专用模块 QLQ-CR38。问卷在治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后的年度随访中收集。P值小于0.05以及差异达到或超过10个百分点即具有统计学意义:结果:放化疗后评分立即下降,尤其是疼痛(+19.8 分)、疲劳(+16.1 分)和腹泻(+24.8 分)。治疗结束一年后,大部分数值又与德国普通人群的数值相当或更好,只有角色功能(-19.8pp)、社会功能(-24.6pp)、腹泻(-21.6pp)和经济困难(-16.3pp)明显恶化。从 2010 年到 2022 年,一些基线明显恶化;它们是角色功能(-23.9 个百分点)、社会功能(-17.3 个百分点)、身体形象(-15.2 个百分点)、疲劳(+13.8 个百分点)以及恶心和呕吐(+10.5 个百分点):结论:无法证明治疗在减少副作用方面有所改善,因此也无法证明随着时间的推移生活质量有所提高。个人评分随时间推移而下降似乎并不是直肠癌患者特有的问题,而是与德国社会发展或系统性医疗保健因素有关,与肿瘤疾病没有直接关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Change in Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Rectal Cancer Between 2010 and 2022.

Background/objectives: Advanced rectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and has a significant impact on public health. Because favorable and long-term survival has been achieved with multimodal therapy, patient quality of life is very important. The intention of this study was to assess patients' quality of life using various functioning and symptom scores from the years 2010 to 2022 and to examine changes over time.

Methods: Data on health-related quality of life were collected from rectal cancer patients treated at the University Hospital Erlangen in Germany over a period of 13 years. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the rectal cancer-specific module QLQ-CR38 were completed in this study by a total of 516 patients. The questionnaires were collected before, during and at annual follow-up visits after treatment. Statistical significance was defined as p-values < 0.05 as well as a difference of 10 or more percentage points.

Results: The deterioration in scores is most pronounced immediately after radiochemotherapy, especially for pain (+19.8 pp), fatigue (+16.1 pp) and diarrhoea (+24.8 pp). One year after the end of therapy, most of the values are again comparable to or better than those of the German general population and only role functioning (-19.8 pp), social functioning (-24.6 pp), diarrhoea (-21.6 pp) and financial difficulties (-16.3 pp) are considerably worse. Some baselines deteriorate clearly over time from 2010 to 2022; these are role functioning (-23.9 pp), social functioning (-17.3 pp), body image (-15.2 pp), fatigue (+13.8 pp) and nausea and vomiting (+10.5 pp).

Conclusions: An improvement in therapy in terms of a reduction in side effects and, thus, an improvement in quality of life over time could not be proven. The deterioration in individual scores over time does not appear to be a problem specific to rectal cancer patients, but rather, is associated with social developments or systemic healthcare factors in German society that are not directly related to oncological diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Alexithymia and Associated Factors Among Dental Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of Periodontitis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of the Friday Night Live Mentoring Program on Supporting Positive Youth Development Outcomes. Analysis of Speech Features in Alzheimer's Disease with Machine Learning: A Case-Control Study. Mental Health Status of Patients Recovered from COVID-19 in Macau: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1