长卡素单抗在高风险和重度预处理复发/难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤中的应用:来自美国21个中心的实际情况分析。

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Haematologica Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.3324/haematol.2024.285977
Viktoriya Zelikson, Ashwath Gurumurthi, Yazeed Sawalha, Kaitlin Annunzio, Aditi Saha, Ning Dong, David Qualls, Behzad Amoozgar, Brad Kahl, John Baird, Pavan Challa, Scott F Huntington, Jennifer Santos, Steven Bair, Mayur Narkhede, Shuning Li, Zachary Frosch, Carrie Ho, Stephen D Smith, Allison Winter, Daniel Landsburg, Fateeha Furqan, Mehdi Hamadani, Katelin Baird, Jason Romancik, Hanan Alharthy, Jennie Law, Leyla Bojanini, Ranjana Advani, Boyu Hu, Patrick Connor Johnson, Natalie S Grover, Mwanasha Merril, Jennifer L Crombie, Nazila Shafagati, Cole Sterling, Loretta J Nastoupil, Narendranath Epperla, Emily C Ayers
{"title":"长卡素单抗在高风险和重度预处理复发/难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤中的应用:来自美国21个中心的实际情况分析。","authors":"Viktoriya Zelikson, Ashwath Gurumurthi, Yazeed Sawalha, Kaitlin Annunzio, Aditi Saha, Ning Dong, David Qualls, Behzad Amoozgar, Brad Kahl, John Baird, Pavan Challa, Scott F Huntington, Jennifer Santos, Steven Bair, Mayur Narkhede, Shuning Li, Zachary Frosch, Carrie Ho, Stephen D Smith, Allison Winter, Daniel Landsburg, Fateeha Furqan, Mehdi Hamadani, Katelin Baird, Jason Romancik, Hanan Alharthy, Jennie Law, Leyla Bojanini, Ranjana Advani, Boyu Hu, Patrick Connor Johnson, Natalie S Grover, Mwanasha Merril, Jennifer L Crombie, Nazila Shafagati, Cole Sterling, Loretta J Nastoupil, Narendranath Epperla, Emily C Ayers","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2024.285977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab-teserine (Lonca) is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) which was FDA approved for R/R DLBCL patients who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy based on the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting (RWS). This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis includes 187 patients with notably higher risk baseline features compared to LOTIS-2 including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (HGBL) (22% vs 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs 3). The complete response (CR) rate was 14% and overall response rate (ORR) was 32%. Median event free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and HGBL had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and CR to most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the RWS, the response rates, EFS, and OS were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients within the real world compared to those enrolled on clinical study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loncastuximab in high-risk and heavily pretreated relapsed / refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a real-world analysis from 21 US centers.\",\"authors\":\"Viktoriya Zelikson, Ashwath Gurumurthi, Yazeed Sawalha, Kaitlin Annunzio, Aditi Saha, Ning Dong, David Qualls, Behzad Amoozgar, Brad Kahl, John Baird, Pavan Challa, Scott F Huntington, Jennifer Santos, Steven Bair, Mayur Narkhede, Shuning Li, Zachary Frosch, Carrie Ho, Stephen D Smith, Allison Winter, Daniel Landsburg, Fateeha Furqan, Mehdi Hamadani, Katelin Baird, Jason Romancik, Hanan Alharthy, Jennie Law, Leyla Bojanini, Ranjana Advani, Boyu Hu, Patrick Connor Johnson, Natalie S Grover, Mwanasha Merril, Jennifer L Crombie, Nazila Shafagati, Cole Sterling, Loretta J Nastoupil, Narendranath Epperla, Emily C Ayers\",\"doi\":\"10.3324/haematol.2024.285977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab-teserine (Lonca) is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) which was FDA approved for R/R DLBCL patients who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy based on the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting (RWS). This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis includes 187 patients with notably higher risk baseline features compared to LOTIS-2 including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (HGBL) (22% vs 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs 3). The complete response (CR) rate was 14% and overall response rate (ORR) was 32%. Median event free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and HGBL had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and CR to most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the RWS, the response rates, EFS, and OS were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients within the real world compared to those enrolled on clinical study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haematologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2024.285977\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2024.285977","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复发/难治(R/R)弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的治疗效果很差。Loncastuximab-teserine(Lonca)是一种抗体药物共轭物(ADC),根据LOTIS-2试验,FDA已批准用于至少接受过两线治疗的复发/难治性DLBCL患者。然而,有关它在真实世界(RWS)中疗效的数据却很有限。这项回顾性研究包括 21 个美国中心,评估了接受龙卡治疗的 R/R DLBCL 患者的疗效。与 LOTIS-2 相比,我们的分析包括了 187 例风险基线特征明显较高的患者,其中包括较高比例的肿块型疾病患者(17% 对 0%)、高级别 B 细胞组织学 (HGBL) 患者(22% 对 8%),以及较多的既往治疗次数(中位数为 4 次对 3 次)。完全应答率(CR)为14%,总应答率(ORR)为32%。中位无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为 2.1 个月和 4.6 个月。大块病变和HGBL患者的预后明显较差,而非原发生殖中心细胞和最近一次治疗获得CR的患者预后较好。总之,在这项规模最大的回顾性队列研究中,隆卡在RWS中的反应率、EFS和OS均低于LOTIS-2中的报告,这可能反映了与临床研究中的入组患者相比,隆卡在现实世界中用于风险更高、预处理更多的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Loncastuximab in high-risk and heavily pretreated relapsed / refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a real-world analysis from 21 US centers.

Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab-teserine (Lonca) is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) which was FDA approved for R/R DLBCL patients who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy based on the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting (RWS). This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis includes 187 patients with notably higher risk baseline features compared to LOTIS-2 including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (HGBL) (22% vs 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs 3). The complete response (CR) rate was 14% and overall response rate (ORR) was 32%. Median event free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and HGBL had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and CR to most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the RWS, the response rates, EFS, and OS were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients within the real world compared to those enrolled on clinical study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haematologica
Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
349
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research. Scope: The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that: Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases. Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.
期刊最新文献
"The End of the Golden Weather": therapeutic strategies for mantle cell lymphoma relapsed or refractory to covalent BTK inhibitors. Challenges associated with access to recently developed hemophilia treatments in routine care: perspectives of healthcare professionals. Germline genetics, disease, and exposure to medication influence longitudinal dynamics of clonal hematopoiesis. In T-follicular helper lymphomas, 'one lymphoma can hide another': beginning to explain. Is age just a number? Intensive therapy for core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1