胎盘位置不正患者的自体献血和输血:单机构试点研究和系统性文献综述。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.3390/healthcare12212138
Iiji Koh, Kaoru Kawasaki, Kaori Moriuchi, Reona Shiro, Yoshie Yo, Noriomi Matsumura
{"title":"胎盘位置不正患者的自体献血和输血:单机构试点研究和系统性文献综述。","authors":"Iiji Koh, Kaoru Kawasaki, Kaori Moriuchi, Reona Shiro, Yoshie Yo, Noriomi Matsumura","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12212138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous blood donation for placental malposition is common in Japan, but no studies have scientifically evaluated its usefulness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity for autologous blood donation for placental malposition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent autologous blood donation for placental malposition at Kindai University Hospital from 2012 to 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were able to avoid allogeneic blood transfusion by autologous blood transfusion; secondary outcomes were autologous blood disposal rate, allogeneic blood transfusion rate, and complications of autologous blood donation and allogeneic blood transfusion. A systematic review of studies on autologous blood transfusion for placental malposition was conducted on PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients (total placenta previa 16; marginal placenta previa 20; low-lying placenta 16) were included. Eight (15%) had complications at the time of autologous blood donation, including non-reassuring fetal heart rate, but no sequelae. Allogeneic blood transfusion was avoided by autologous blood transfusion in only five cases (9.6%). Autologous blood was discarded in nine cases (17%), seven of which had a low-lying placenta positioned normally at delivery. Allogeneic blood transfusion was performed in eight cases (15%) with no complications. In the systematic review, seven articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected for further evaluation. The results showed that there were no publications that scientifically demonstrated the benefit of autologous blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate that autologous blood donation for placental malposition has little benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"12 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous Blood Donation and Transfusion in Patients with Placental Malposition: A Single-Institution Pilot Study and Systematic Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Iiji Koh, Kaoru Kawasaki, Kaori Moriuchi, Reona Shiro, Yoshie Yo, Noriomi Matsumura\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare12212138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous blood donation for placental malposition is common in Japan, but no studies have scientifically evaluated its usefulness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity for autologous blood donation for placental malposition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent autologous blood donation for placental malposition at Kindai University Hospital from 2012 to 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were able to avoid allogeneic blood transfusion by autologous blood transfusion; secondary outcomes were autologous blood disposal rate, allogeneic blood transfusion rate, and complications of autologous blood donation and allogeneic blood transfusion. A systematic review of studies on autologous blood transfusion for placental malposition was conducted on PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients (total placenta previa 16; marginal placenta previa 20; low-lying placenta 16) were included. Eight (15%) had complications at the time of autologous blood donation, including non-reassuring fetal heart rate, but no sequelae. Allogeneic blood transfusion was avoided by autologous blood transfusion in only five cases (9.6%). Autologous blood was discarded in nine cases (17%), seven of which had a low-lying placenta positioned normally at delivery. Allogeneic blood transfusion was performed in eight cases (15%) with no complications. In the systematic review, seven articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected for further evaluation. The results showed that there were no publications that scientifically demonstrated the benefit of autologous blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate that autologous blood donation for placental malposition has little benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"12 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544799/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自体血捐献治疗胎盘早剥在日本很常见,但尚未有研究对其效用进行科学评估。本研究的目的是评估自体献血治疗胎盘早剥的必要性:方法:对 2012 年至 2022 年期间在金台大学医院接受自体血捐献治疗胎盘错位的患者进行回顾性研究。主要结果是通过自体输血避免异体输血的患者比例;次要结果是自体血处置率、异体输血率以及自体献血和异体输血并发症。在PubMed上对自体输血治疗胎盘位置不正的研究进行了系统性回顾:结果:共纳入52例患者(完全性前置胎盘16例;边缘性前置胎盘20例;低置胎盘16例)。8例(15%)患者在自体献血时出现并发症,包括胎心率无法保证,但没有后遗症。只有 5 例(9.6%)患者通过自体输血避免了异体输血。有 9 例(17%)产妇放弃了自体输血,其中 7 例在分娩时胎盘位置正常。有 8 例(15%)进行了异体输血,未出现并发症。在系统综述中,有七篇符合纳入标准的文章被选作进一步评估。结果显示,没有任何文献科学地证明了自体输血的益处:本研究结果表明,自体输血治疗胎盘植入不良的益处不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Autologous Blood Donation and Transfusion in Patients with Placental Malposition: A Single-Institution Pilot Study and Systematic Literature Review.

Background: Autologous blood donation for placental malposition is common in Japan, but no studies have scientifically evaluated its usefulness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity for autologous blood donation for placental malposition.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent autologous blood donation for placental malposition at Kindai University Hospital from 2012 to 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were able to avoid allogeneic blood transfusion by autologous blood transfusion; secondary outcomes were autologous blood disposal rate, allogeneic blood transfusion rate, and complications of autologous blood donation and allogeneic blood transfusion. A systematic review of studies on autologous blood transfusion for placental malposition was conducted on PubMed.

Results: Fifty-two patients (total placenta previa 16; marginal placenta previa 20; low-lying placenta 16) were included. Eight (15%) had complications at the time of autologous blood donation, including non-reassuring fetal heart rate, but no sequelae. Allogeneic blood transfusion was avoided by autologous blood transfusion in only five cases (9.6%). Autologous blood was discarded in nine cases (17%), seven of which had a low-lying placenta positioned normally at delivery. Allogeneic blood transfusion was performed in eight cases (15%) with no complications. In the systematic review, seven articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected for further evaluation. The results showed that there were no publications that scientifically demonstrated the benefit of autologous blood transfusion.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that autologous blood donation for placental malposition has little benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Alexithymia and Associated Factors Among Dental Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of Periodontitis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of the Friday Night Live Mentoring Program on Supporting Positive Youth Development Outcomes. Analysis of Speech Features in Alzheimer's Disease with Machine Learning: A Case-Control Study. Mental Health Status of Patients Recovered from COVID-19 in Macau: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1