评估重症患者的肌肉质量变化:用超声波和生物电阻抗测量康复效果。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.3390/healthcare12212128
Mijoo Kim, Soyun Kim, Yerin Ju, Soyoung Ahn, Song I Lee
{"title":"评估重症患者的肌肉质量变化:用超声波和生物电阻抗测量康复效果。","authors":"Mijoo Kim, Soyun Kim, Yerin Ju, Soyoung Ahn, Song I Lee","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12212128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The loss of muscle mass is common in critically ill patients and is associated with poor prognosis, and efforts have been made to mitigate muscle loss through rehabilitation. This study aimed to evaluate changes in muscle mass in critically ill patients following rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 53 patients expected to stay in the ICU for more than 7 days, dividing them into rehabilitation (15 patients) and no rehabilitation groups (38 patients). Muscle mass was measured using ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics and comorbidities showed no statistical differences between the two groups. Initial measurements of muscles showed no significant differences between the groups in rectus femoris thickness, total anterior thigh muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, echogenicity, or in-body skeletal muscle mass at baseline and 7 days. However, at 14 days, significant differences emerged. The rehabilitation group had greater rectus femoris thickness (1.42 cm vs. 0.81 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and total anterior thigh muscle thickness (3.79 cm vs. 2.32 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.007) compared to the no rehabilitation group. Additionally, the rehabilitation group experienced a significantly smaller reduction in rectus femoris cross-sectional area (-4.6% vs. -22.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.021). Although survival rates were higher in the rehabilitation group (73.3% vs. 52.6%), this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.096).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that rehabilitation in critically ill patients is associated with a slower rate of muscle loss, particularly in the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris muscle, which may be beneficial for patient recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"12 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Muscle Mass Changes in Critically Ill Patients: Rehabilitation Outcomes Measured by Ultrasound and Bioelectrical Impedance.\",\"authors\":\"Mijoo Kim, Soyun Kim, Yerin Ju, Soyoung Ahn, Song I Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare12212128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The loss of muscle mass is common in critically ill patients and is associated with poor prognosis, and efforts have been made to mitigate muscle loss through rehabilitation. This study aimed to evaluate changes in muscle mass in critically ill patients following rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 53 patients expected to stay in the ICU for more than 7 days, dividing them into rehabilitation (15 patients) and no rehabilitation groups (38 patients). Muscle mass was measured using ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics and comorbidities showed no statistical differences between the two groups. Initial measurements of muscles showed no significant differences between the groups in rectus femoris thickness, total anterior thigh muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, echogenicity, or in-body skeletal muscle mass at baseline and 7 days. However, at 14 days, significant differences emerged. The rehabilitation group had greater rectus femoris thickness (1.42 cm vs. 0.81 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and total anterior thigh muscle thickness (3.79 cm vs. 2.32 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.007) compared to the no rehabilitation group. Additionally, the rehabilitation group experienced a significantly smaller reduction in rectus femoris cross-sectional area (-4.6% vs. -22.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.021). Although survival rates were higher in the rehabilitation group (73.3% vs. 52.6%), this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.096).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that rehabilitation in critically ill patients is associated with a slower rate of muscle loss, particularly in the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris muscle, which may be beneficial for patient recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"12 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544994/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:重症患者肌肉质量下降很常见,且与预后不良有关,人们一直在努力通过康复减轻肌肉损失。本研究旨在评估重症患者康复后肌肉质量的变化:我们招募了 53 名预计在重症监护室住院超过 7 天的患者,将他们分为康复组(15 名)和无康复组(38 名)。使用超声波和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)测量肌肉质量:结果:两组患者的基线特征和合并症无统计学差异。对肌肉的初步测量显示,在基线和 7 天时,两组在股直肌厚度、大腿前侧肌肉总厚度、横截面积、回声性或体内骨骼肌质量方面没有显著差异。然而,在 14 天时,出现了显著差异。与无康复训练组相比,康复训练组的股直肌厚度(1.42 厘米对 0.81 厘米,p = 0.007)和大腿前侧肌肉总厚度(3.79 厘米对 2.32 厘米,p = 0.007)更大。此外,康复组的股直肌横截面积减少幅度明显较小(-4.6% vs. -22.8%,p = 0.021)。虽然康复组的存活率更高(73.3% 对 52.6%),但这一差异在统计学上并不显著(P = 0.096):我们的研究结果表明,重症患者的康复治疗与肌肉流失速度减慢有关,尤其是股直肌的横截面积,这可能有利于患者的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Muscle Mass Changes in Critically Ill Patients: Rehabilitation Outcomes Measured by Ultrasound and Bioelectrical Impedance.

Background/objectives: The loss of muscle mass is common in critically ill patients and is associated with poor prognosis, and efforts have been made to mitigate muscle loss through rehabilitation. This study aimed to evaluate changes in muscle mass in critically ill patients following rehabilitation.

Methods: We enrolled 53 patients expected to stay in the ICU for more than 7 days, dividing them into rehabilitation (15 patients) and no rehabilitation groups (38 patients). Muscle mass was measured using ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

Results: Baseline characteristics and comorbidities showed no statistical differences between the two groups. Initial measurements of muscles showed no significant differences between the groups in rectus femoris thickness, total anterior thigh muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, echogenicity, or in-body skeletal muscle mass at baseline and 7 days. However, at 14 days, significant differences emerged. The rehabilitation group had greater rectus femoris thickness (1.42 cm vs. 0.81 cm, p = 0.007) and total anterior thigh muscle thickness (3.79 cm vs. 2.32 cm, p = 0.007) compared to the no rehabilitation group. Additionally, the rehabilitation group experienced a significantly smaller reduction in rectus femoris cross-sectional area (-4.6% vs. -22.8%, p = 0.021). Although survival rates were higher in the rehabilitation group (73.3% vs. 52.6%), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.096).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that rehabilitation in critically ill patients is associated with a slower rate of muscle loss, particularly in the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris muscle, which may be beneficial for patient recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Alexithymia and Associated Factors Among Dental Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of Periodontitis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of the Friday Night Live Mentoring Program on Supporting Positive Youth Development Outcomes. Analysis of Speech Features in Alzheimer's Disease with Machine Learning: A Case-Control Study. Mental Health Status of Patients Recovered from COVID-19 in Macau: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1