自我管理对慢性病患者的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.3390/healthcare12212151
Yanfang Huang, Sijia Li, Xiuli Lu, Weiqiang Chen, Yun Zhang
{"title":"自我管理对慢性病患者的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Yanfang Huang, Sijia Li, Xiuli Lu, Weiqiang Chen, Yun Zhang","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12212151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic diseases significantly impact global morbidity and mortality, affecting millions. Self-management interventions are crucial for improving patient health outcomes. This study explores the effects of self-management interventions on the quality of life (QOL), self-efficacy, depression, and anxiety of patients with chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, evaluated the risk of bias assessment, and extracted characteristics and outcomes among patients with chronic diseases. For each included study, we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the main outcomes. When deemed feasible, the heterogeneity of the study was explored by meta-analysis and subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four studies involving a total of 7603 patients with chronic diseases were included. Self-management interventions significantly improved quality of life (Higher-better QOL and Lower-better QOL), self-efficacy, and reduced depression symptoms compared to usual care (95%CI 0.01 to 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.03; 95%CI -0.49 to -0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 95%CI 0.19 to 0.62, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 95%CI -0.23 to -0.07, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, no significant effect was found for anxiety (95%CI -0.18 to 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.18). In the heterogeneity analysis, Lower-better QOL and self-efficacy were all higher than 50% (I<sup>2</sup> = 80%, 87%). After the subgroup analysis, the heterogeneity of Lower-better QOL and self-efficacy was less than 50% (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, 16.1%). Subgroup analyses revealed that studies with mean age greater than 60 years old and follow-up times greater than 6 months were more effective in improving patients' Lower-better QOL (<i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.004), whereas follow-up times less than 6 months were better at reducing patients' anxiety symptoms (<i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-management interventions are more effective than routine care in managing chronic diseases, significantly improving patients' quality of life, self-efficacy, and reducing depressive symptoms, but they did not show significant improvements in anxiety symptoms. Overall, self-management interventions for chronic diseases can help patients adapt to the changes brought about by the disease and self-manage diseases to prevent disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"12 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Self-Management on Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yanfang Huang, Sijia Li, Xiuli Lu, Weiqiang Chen, Yun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare12212151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic diseases significantly impact global morbidity and mortality, affecting millions. Self-management interventions are crucial for improving patient health outcomes. This study explores the effects of self-management interventions on the quality of life (QOL), self-efficacy, depression, and anxiety of patients with chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, evaluated the risk of bias assessment, and extracted characteristics and outcomes among patients with chronic diseases. For each included study, we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the main outcomes. When deemed feasible, the heterogeneity of the study was explored by meta-analysis and subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four studies involving a total of 7603 patients with chronic diseases were included. Self-management interventions significantly improved quality of life (Higher-better QOL and Lower-better QOL), self-efficacy, and reduced depression symptoms compared to usual care (95%CI 0.01 to 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.03; 95%CI -0.49 to -0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 95%CI 0.19 to 0.62, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 95%CI -0.23 to -0.07, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, no significant effect was found for anxiety (95%CI -0.18 to 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.18). In the heterogeneity analysis, Lower-better QOL and self-efficacy were all higher than 50% (I<sup>2</sup> = 80%, 87%). After the subgroup analysis, the heterogeneity of Lower-better QOL and self-efficacy was less than 50% (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, 16.1%). Subgroup analyses revealed that studies with mean age greater than 60 years old and follow-up times greater than 6 months were more effective in improving patients' Lower-better QOL (<i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.004), whereas follow-up times less than 6 months were better at reducing patients' anxiety symptoms (<i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-management interventions are more effective than routine care in managing chronic diseases, significantly improving patients' quality of life, self-efficacy, and reducing depressive symptoms, but they did not show significant improvements in anxiety symptoms. Overall, self-management interventions for chronic diseases can help patients adapt to the changes brought about by the disease and self-manage diseases to prevent disease progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"12 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性疾病严重影响全球的发病率和死亡率,使数百万人受到影响。自我管理干预对于改善患者的健康状况至关重要。本研究探讨了自我管理干预对慢性病患者生活质量(QOL)、自我效能感、抑郁和焦虑的影响:方法:从 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 中检索相关研究。两名审稿人独立筛选文献,评估偏倚风险,并提取慢性病患者的特征和结果。对于每项纳入的研究,我们都计算了主要结果的标准化平均差(SMD)和 95% 置信区间(CI)。在可行的情况下,我们通过荟萃分析和亚组分析探讨了研究的异质性:结果:共纳入 34 项研究,涉及 7603 名慢性病患者。与常规护理相比,自我管理干预能明显改善生活质量(更高-更好的生活质量和更低-更好的生活质量)、自我效能并减少抑郁症状(95%CI 0.01至0.15,p = 0.03;95%CI -0.49至-0.08,p = 0.006;95%CI 0.19至0.62,p < 0.001;95%CI -0.23至-0.07,p < 0.001)。然而,焦虑没有发现明显的影响(95%CI -0.18 至 0.03,p = 0.18)。在异质性分析中,较低-较好的 QOL 和自我效能均高于 50%(I2 = 80%,87%)。经过亚组分析后,较低较好的 QOL 和自我效能的异质性低于 50%(I2 = 0%,16.1%)。亚组分析表明,平均年龄大于 60 岁、随访时间超过 6 个月的研究对改善患者的较低较好 QOL 更有效(p = 0.03,p = 0.004),而随访时间少于 6 个月的研究在减少患者焦虑症状方面效果更好(p = 0.03):自我管理干预在慢性病管理方面比常规护理更有效,能显著改善患者的生活质量、自我效能感和减少抑郁症状,但在焦虑症状方面没有明显改善。总体而言,慢性病的自我管理干预可以帮助患者适应疾病带来的变化,并对疾病进行自我管理,防止疾病恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Self-Management on Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Chronic diseases significantly impact global morbidity and mortality, affecting millions. Self-management interventions are crucial for improving patient health outcomes. This study explores the effects of self-management interventions on the quality of life (QOL), self-efficacy, depression, and anxiety of patients with chronic diseases.

Methods: Relevant studies were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, evaluated the risk of bias assessment, and extracted characteristics and outcomes among patients with chronic diseases. For each included study, we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the main outcomes. When deemed feasible, the heterogeneity of the study was explored by meta-analysis and subgroup analysis.

Results: Thirty-four studies involving a total of 7603 patients with chronic diseases were included. Self-management interventions significantly improved quality of life (Higher-better QOL and Lower-better QOL), self-efficacy, and reduced depression symptoms compared to usual care (95%CI 0.01 to 0.15, p = 0.03; 95%CI -0.49 to -0.08, p = 0.006; 95%CI 0.19 to 0.62, p < 0.001; 95%CI -0.23 to -0.07, p < 0.001). However, no significant effect was found for anxiety (95%CI -0.18 to 0.03, p = 0.18). In the heterogeneity analysis, Lower-better QOL and self-efficacy were all higher than 50% (I2 = 80%, 87%). After the subgroup analysis, the heterogeneity of Lower-better QOL and self-efficacy was less than 50% (I2 = 0%, 16.1%). Subgroup analyses revealed that studies with mean age greater than 60 years old and follow-up times greater than 6 months were more effective in improving patients' Lower-better QOL (p = 0.03, p = 0.004), whereas follow-up times less than 6 months were better at reducing patients' anxiety symptoms (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Self-management interventions are more effective than routine care in managing chronic diseases, significantly improving patients' quality of life, self-efficacy, and reducing depressive symptoms, but they did not show significant improvements in anxiety symptoms. Overall, self-management interventions for chronic diseases can help patients adapt to the changes brought about by the disease and self-manage diseases to prevent disease progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Alexithymia and Associated Factors Among Dental Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of Periodontitis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of the Friday Night Live Mentoring Program on Supporting Positive Youth Development Outcomes. Analysis of Speech Features in Alzheimer's Disease with Machine Learning: A Case-Control Study. Mental Health Status of Patients Recovered from COVID-19 in Macau: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1