对艾滋病毒感染者实施患者报告结果:丹麦一家门诊诊所的患者和医疗服务提供者的见解。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES HIV Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1111/hiv.13734
Lotte Ørneborg Rodkjær, Merete Storgaard, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
{"title":"对艾滋病毒感染者实施患者报告结果:丹麦一家门诊诊所的患者和医疗服务提供者的见解。","authors":"Lotte Ørneborg Rodkjær, Merete Storgaard, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard","doi":"10.1111/hiv.13734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have emerged as a valuable tool for aligning HIV care with patient needs and priorities. This study aimed to explore patient and healthcare provider (HCP) experiences of integrating a PRO solution into standard clinical care for HIV in a Danish outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A tailored PRO solution for people living with HIV was developed in a Danish outpatient clinic. Patients were eligible if they were aged >18 years, spoke Danish, had been on effective antiretroviral therapy for 2 years, and had no additional health issues. Patients completed an electronic questionnaire 14 days before in-clinic consultations. HCPs reviewed patients' responses before these consultations. We assessed the usability, acceptability, and relevance of the PRO solution by conducting semi-structured interviews with 24 patients (12 responders and 12 non-responders) and six HCPs. A further 95 non-responders were interviewed over the phone. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents found that PROs improved patient-provider communication, treatment planning, and self-management. Non-respondents faced barriers such as health literacy, cultural beliefs, and access to technology, necessitating alternative delivery methods. HCPs found that PROs facilitated person-centred care and symptom management, but HCPs faced challenges such as insufficient training, resources, and organizational support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing PROs in HIV care is challenging because of the patient diversity, clinician training needs, and organizational adaptations. Nevertheless, the use of PROs is associated with enhanced person-centred care. Future recommendations include tailored use of PROs, better understanding of the impact on patient groups, on-site questionnaire completion, and emphasis on shared decision-making between patients and HCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13176,"journal":{"name":"HIV Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of patient-reported outcomes for people living with HIV: Insights from patients and healthcare providers in a Danish outpatient clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Lotte Ørneborg Rodkjær, Merete Storgaard, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hiv.13734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have emerged as a valuable tool for aligning HIV care with patient needs and priorities. This study aimed to explore patient and healthcare provider (HCP) experiences of integrating a PRO solution into standard clinical care for HIV in a Danish outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A tailored PRO solution for people living with HIV was developed in a Danish outpatient clinic. Patients were eligible if they were aged >18 years, spoke Danish, had been on effective antiretroviral therapy for 2 years, and had no additional health issues. Patients completed an electronic questionnaire 14 days before in-clinic consultations. HCPs reviewed patients' responses before these consultations. We assessed the usability, acceptability, and relevance of the PRO solution by conducting semi-structured interviews with 24 patients (12 responders and 12 non-responders) and six HCPs. A further 95 non-responders were interviewed over the phone. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents found that PROs improved patient-provider communication, treatment planning, and self-management. Non-respondents faced barriers such as health literacy, cultural beliefs, and access to technology, necessitating alternative delivery methods. HCPs found that PROs facilitated person-centred care and symptom management, but HCPs faced challenges such as insufficient training, resources, and organizational support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing PROs in HIV care is challenging because of the patient diversity, clinician training needs, and organizational adaptations. Nevertheless, the use of PROs is associated with enhanced person-centred care. Future recommendations include tailored use of PROs, better understanding of the impact on patient groups, on-site questionnaire completion, and emphasis on shared decision-making between patients and HCPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIV Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIV Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13734\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患者报告结果(PROs)已成为根据患者需求和优先事项调整艾滋病护理的重要工具。本研究旨在探讨丹麦一家门诊诊所将患者报告结果(PRO)解决方案整合到艾滋病标准临床治疗中的患者和医疗服务提供者(HCP)的经验:方法:在丹麦一家门诊诊所为艾滋病感染者量身定制了一个 PRO 解决方案。年龄大于 18 岁、会讲丹麦语、接受有效抗逆转录病毒治疗 2 年且无其他健康问题的患者均符合条件。患者在门诊就诊前 14 天填写一份电子问卷。在就诊前,保健医生会查看患者的回答。我们对 24 名患者(12 名应答者和 12 名未应答者)和 6 名高级保健人员进行了半结构化访谈,评估了 PRO 解决方案的可用性、可接受性和相关性。另外还通过电话采访了 95 名未应答者。采用主题分析法对数据进行了分析:受访者发现,PROs 改善了患者与医护人员之间的沟通、治疗规划和自我管理。非应答者面临着健康知识普及、文化信仰和技术获取等障碍,因此需要采用其他方法。HCPs发现PROs促进了以人为本的护理和症状管理,但HCPs面临着培训、资源和组织支持不足等挑战:结论:由于患者的多样性、临床医生的培训需求以及组织机构的适应性,在艾滋病护理中实施PROs具有挑战性。尽管如此,PROs 的使用与加强以人为本的护理有关。未来的建议包括有针对性地使用PROs,更好地了解PROs对患者群体的影响,现场填写问卷,以及强调患者和HCP共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of patient-reported outcomes for people living with HIV: Insights from patients and healthcare providers in a Danish outpatient clinic.

Objectives: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have emerged as a valuable tool for aligning HIV care with patient needs and priorities. This study aimed to explore patient and healthcare provider (HCP) experiences of integrating a PRO solution into standard clinical care for HIV in a Danish outpatient clinic.

Methods: A tailored PRO solution for people living with HIV was developed in a Danish outpatient clinic. Patients were eligible if they were aged >18 years, spoke Danish, had been on effective antiretroviral therapy for 2 years, and had no additional health issues. Patients completed an electronic questionnaire 14 days before in-clinic consultations. HCPs reviewed patients' responses before these consultations. We assessed the usability, acceptability, and relevance of the PRO solution by conducting semi-structured interviews with 24 patients (12 responders and 12 non-responders) and six HCPs. A further 95 non-responders were interviewed over the phone. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Respondents found that PROs improved patient-provider communication, treatment planning, and self-management. Non-respondents faced barriers such as health literacy, cultural beliefs, and access to technology, necessitating alternative delivery methods. HCPs found that PROs facilitated person-centred care and symptom management, but HCPs faced challenges such as insufficient training, resources, and organizational support.

Conclusions: Implementing PROs in HIV care is challenging because of the patient diversity, clinician training needs, and organizational adaptations. Nevertheless, the use of PROs is associated with enhanced person-centred care. Future recommendations include tailored use of PROs, better understanding of the impact on patient groups, on-site questionnaire completion, and emphasis on shared decision-making between patients and HCPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HIV Medicine
HIV Medicine 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: HIV Medicine aims to provide an alternative outlet for publication of international research papers in the field of HIV Medicine, embracing clinical, pharmocological, epidemiological, ethical, preclinical and in vitro studies. In addition, the journal will commission reviews and other feature articles. It will focus on evidence-based medicine as the mainstay of successful management of HIV and AIDS. The journal is specifically aimed at researchers and clinicians with responsibility for treating HIV seropositive patients.
期刊最新文献
High prevalence of osteoporosis among virally suppressed older people (≥60 years) living with HIV. Comparing short-term mortality between people with and without HIV admitted to the intensive care unit: A single-centre matched cohort study (2000-2019). Rising mortality among people who inject drugs living with HIV in Scotland, UK: A 20-year retrospective cohort study. In vitro and patient studies with platelets to explore off-target cardiovascular effects of integrase inhibitors. Clinical staff attitudes towards opt-out consent for blood-borne virus screening in emergency departments in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1