选择 ForenSeq 套件的 DNA 引物组(A 或 B):墨西哥混血人口样本的法医评估。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL International Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1007/s00414-024-03366-1
José Alonso Aguilar-Velázquez, Mayra Elizabeth García-Aceves, Miranda Fabiola Córdova-Mercado, Mariano Guardado-Estrada, Emiliano Peña-Durán, Alexa Villavicencio-Queijeiro, Orlando Salas-Salas, Carolina Elena Coronado-Ávila, Christian Adrián Cárdenas-Monroy, Benito Ramos-González, Héctor Rangel-Villalobos
{"title":"选择 ForenSeq 套件的 DNA 引物组(A 或 B):墨西哥混血人口样本的法医评估。","authors":"José Alonso Aguilar-Velázquez, Mayra Elizabeth García-Aceves, Miranda Fabiola Córdova-Mercado, Mariano Guardado-Estrada, Emiliano Peña-Durán, Alexa Villavicencio-Queijeiro, Orlando Salas-Salas, Carolina Elena Coronado-Ávila, Christian Adrián Cárdenas-Monroy, Benito Ramos-González, Héctor Rangel-Villalobos","doi":"10.1007/s00414-024-03366-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) overcomes many PCR-CE limitations to analyze STRs and allow simultaneous inclusion of SNPs in forensic cases. By MPS, the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit analyzes 27 aSTRs, 7 X-STRs, 24Y-STRs, and 94 identity-informative SNPs (iiSNPs) with the DNA Primer Set-A (DPS-A). Optionally, the DNA Primer Set-B (DPS-B) adds to the analysis 56 ancestry-informative SNPs (aiSNPs) and 24 phenotype-informative SNPs (piSNPs), but diminishes from 96 to 32 the number of samples per sequencing run. We assessed the forensic informativity provided by the loci analyzed by these two DPS in admixed individuals from Mexico City (Center, Mexico). For STRs, we report length-based (LB) and sequence-based (SB) allele frequencies and forensic parameters of the 152 identity informative markers (DPS-A). For aSTRs, the combined PD of SB genotypes (PD ~ 100%) was ~ 2949 times larger than that from LB. Conversely, the observed phenotype distribution offered low PD levels (PD = 6.6% and 10.4%), whereas piSNPs predicted accurately only the modal brown eye and dark hair colors, respectively. Similarly, aiSNPs detected a large prevalence of admixed individuals (97.3%; PD = 5.4%). Although few individuals were inferred as Europeans and Native Americans (1.37% each), they were self-declared as admixed, which result confusing for HID purposes. In brief, SB genotypes increased significantly the informativity of STRs to solve complex cases (DPS-A), whereas aiSNPs and piSNPs added mostly irrelevant information (DPS-B). We provide useful cost-benefit criteria in one Latin American population to choose DPS-A (96 samples) instead of DPS-B (32 samples) of the Forenseq kit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice between DNA primer sets (A or B) of the ForenSeq kit: forensic evaluation in a Mexican admixed population sample.\",\"authors\":\"José Alonso Aguilar-Velázquez, Mayra Elizabeth García-Aceves, Miranda Fabiola Córdova-Mercado, Mariano Guardado-Estrada, Emiliano Peña-Durán, Alexa Villavicencio-Queijeiro, Orlando Salas-Salas, Carolina Elena Coronado-Ávila, Christian Adrián Cárdenas-Monroy, Benito Ramos-González, Héctor Rangel-Villalobos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00414-024-03366-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) overcomes many PCR-CE limitations to analyze STRs and allow simultaneous inclusion of SNPs in forensic cases. By MPS, the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit analyzes 27 aSTRs, 7 X-STRs, 24Y-STRs, and 94 identity-informative SNPs (iiSNPs) with the DNA Primer Set-A (DPS-A). Optionally, the DNA Primer Set-B (DPS-B) adds to the analysis 56 ancestry-informative SNPs (aiSNPs) and 24 phenotype-informative SNPs (piSNPs), but diminishes from 96 to 32 the number of samples per sequencing run. We assessed the forensic informativity provided by the loci analyzed by these two DPS in admixed individuals from Mexico City (Center, Mexico). For STRs, we report length-based (LB) and sequence-based (SB) allele frequencies and forensic parameters of the 152 identity informative markers (DPS-A). For aSTRs, the combined PD of SB genotypes (PD ~ 100%) was ~ 2949 times larger than that from LB. Conversely, the observed phenotype distribution offered low PD levels (PD = 6.6% and 10.4%), whereas piSNPs predicted accurately only the modal brown eye and dark hair colors, respectively. Similarly, aiSNPs detected a large prevalence of admixed individuals (97.3%; PD = 5.4%). Although few individuals were inferred as Europeans and Native Americans (1.37% each), they were self-declared as admixed, which result confusing for HID purposes. In brief, SB genotypes increased significantly the informativity of STRs to solve complex cases (DPS-A), whereas aiSNPs and piSNPs added mostly irrelevant information (DPS-B). We provide useful cost-benefit criteria in one Latin American population to choose DPS-A (96 samples) instead of DPS-B (32 samples) of the Forenseq kit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03366-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03366-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大规模平行测序(MPS)克服了 PCR-CE 在分析 STR 方面的许多局限性,可同时将 SNP 纳入法医案件。通过 MPS,ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep 套件利用 DNA 引物组-A(DPS-A)分析 27 个 aSTR、7 个 X-STR、24 个 Y-STR 和 94 个身份信息 SNPs (iiSNPs)。DNA 引物组-B(DPS-B)可选择增加 56 个祖先信息 SNPs(aiSNPs)和 24 个表型信息 SNPs(piSNPs)的分析,但每次测序运行的样本数量从 96 个减少到 32 个。我们在墨西哥城(墨西哥中心)的混血个体中评估了这两个 DPS 所分析的位点所提供的法医信息量。对于 STRs,我们报告了基于长度(LB)和基于序列(SB)的等位基因频率以及 152 个身份信息标记(DPS-A)的法证参数。对于 aSTRs,SB 基因型的综合 PD(PD ~ 100%)是 LB 基因型的 ~ 2949 倍。相反,观察到的表型分布提供了较低的 PD 水平(PD = 6.6% 和 10.4%),而 piSNPs 仅分别准确预测了棕色眼睛和深色头发的模态颜色。同样,aiSNPs 也检测到了大量混血个体(97.3%;PD = 5.4%)。虽然很少有人被推断为欧洲人和美洲原住民(各占 1.37%),但他们都自我声明为混血儿,这导致了 HID 目的的混淆。简而言之,SB 基因型大大提高了 STR 在解决复杂案件方面的信息量(DPS-A),而 aasSNPs 和 piSNPs 则增加了大部分无关信息(DPS-B)。我们在一个拉丁美洲人群中提供了有用的成本效益标准,以选择 Forenseq 套件的 DPS-A(96 个样本)而不是 DPS-B(32 个样本)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choice between DNA primer sets (A or B) of the ForenSeq kit: forensic evaluation in a Mexican admixed population sample.

Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) overcomes many PCR-CE limitations to analyze STRs and allow simultaneous inclusion of SNPs in forensic cases. By MPS, the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit analyzes 27 aSTRs, 7 X-STRs, 24Y-STRs, and 94 identity-informative SNPs (iiSNPs) with the DNA Primer Set-A (DPS-A). Optionally, the DNA Primer Set-B (DPS-B) adds to the analysis 56 ancestry-informative SNPs (aiSNPs) and 24 phenotype-informative SNPs (piSNPs), but diminishes from 96 to 32 the number of samples per sequencing run. We assessed the forensic informativity provided by the loci analyzed by these two DPS in admixed individuals from Mexico City (Center, Mexico). For STRs, we report length-based (LB) and sequence-based (SB) allele frequencies and forensic parameters of the 152 identity informative markers (DPS-A). For aSTRs, the combined PD of SB genotypes (PD ~ 100%) was ~ 2949 times larger than that from LB. Conversely, the observed phenotype distribution offered low PD levels (PD = 6.6% and 10.4%), whereas piSNPs predicted accurately only the modal brown eye and dark hair colors, respectively. Similarly, aiSNPs detected a large prevalence of admixed individuals (97.3%; PD = 5.4%). Although few individuals were inferred as Europeans and Native Americans (1.37% each), they were self-declared as admixed, which result confusing for HID purposes. In brief, SB genotypes increased significantly the informativity of STRs to solve complex cases (DPS-A), whereas aiSNPs and piSNPs added mostly irrelevant information (DPS-B). We provide useful cost-benefit criteria in one Latin American population to choose DPS-A (96 samples) instead of DPS-B (32 samples) of the Forenseq kit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
期刊最新文献
Exploring radiomic features of lateral cerebral ventricles in postmortem CT for postmortem interval estimation. Fluorescence of various buried fresh and fresh-frozen-thawed tissue types up until the point of active decay: a human taphonomy study. Exploration and application of microorganisms related to the inference of the time since deposition (TsD) in semen and blood stains. Construction of the time since deposition (TsD) model in saliva stains with 16S rRNA full-length sequencing technology and microbial markers. Expression of RIPK-1 and S-100B in traumatic brain injury- exploring a forensic cases series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1