哪些特征会改变邻里步行环境与老年人步行行为之间的关系?

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae095
Andrea L Rosso, Kyle D Moored, Alyson B Harding, Stephanie Studenski, Todd Bear, Geeta Acharya, Caterina Rosano
{"title":"哪些特征会改变邻里步行环境与老年人步行行为之间的关系?","authors":"Andrea L Rosso, Kyle D Moored, Alyson B Harding, Stephanie Studenski, Todd Bear, Geeta Acharya, Caterina Rosano","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neighborhood walkability can influence walking behaviors in older adults. However, its associations of walkability with walking may differ by demographic, socioeconomic, health, social, and residential characteristics due to factors such as increased vulnerability to environmental factors or increased resilience.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In a sample of older adults (<i>n</i> = 493, median age = 82 [range 78-89], 56% female, 31% Black), a walkability index was derived from audits of Google Street View images of participants' immediate neighborhoods. Walking was self-reported in the past week. Effect modifiers by demographic (age, race, gender, marital status), socioeconomic (education, income), health (gait speed, falls, knee pain, depressive symptoms, cognitive status, perceived energy), social (driving status, social engagement), and residential/neighborhood (residence type, neighborhood socioeconomic status [SES], population density) characteristics were assessed by interaction terms in logistic regression models, adjusted for gender, race, gait speed, prior falls, high depressive symptoms, currently driving, and cognitive status. When effect modification was suggested (<i>p</i> for interaction <.1), adjusted analyses of walkability with walking stratified on the effect modifier were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample, 59% walked in the past week and greater walkability was associated with greater odds of walking (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.34). This association (<i>p</i> for interaction range 0.002-0.07) was present for those who were not currently married (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.56), who reported knee pain (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.72) or high depressive symptoms (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.60), or who had declining cognitive function (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.55).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>High walkability may influence physical activity, particularly for those with vulnerabilities related to social, pain, and brain health characteristics. These results should inform neighborhood planning and targeted interventions for vulnerable older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 11","pages":"igae095"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Characteristics Modify the Relation of Neighborhood Walkability and Walking Behavior in Older Adults?\",\"authors\":\"Andrea L Rosso, Kyle D Moored, Alyson B Harding, Stephanie Studenski, Todd Bear, Geeta Acharya, Caterina Rosano\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neighborhood walkability can influence walking behaviors in older adults. However, its associations of walkability with walking may differ by demographic, socioeconomic, health, social, and residential characteristics due to factors such as increased vulnerability to environmental factors or increased resilience.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In a sample of older adults (<i>n</i> = 493, median age = 82 [range 78-89], 56% female, 31% Black), a walkability index was derived from audits of Google Street View images of participants' immediate neighborhoods. Walking was self-reported in the past week. Effect modifiers by demographic (age, race, gender, marital status), socioeconomic (education, income), health (gait speed, falls, knee pain, depressive symptoms, cognitive status, perceived energy), social (driving status, social engagement), and residential/neighborhood (residence type, neighborhood socioeconomic status [SES], population density) characteristics were assessed by interaction terms in logistic regression models, adjusted for gender, race, gait speed, prior falls, high depressive symptoms, currently driving, and cognitive status. When effect modification was suggested (<i>p</i> for interaction <.1), adjusted analyses of walkability with walking stratified on the effect modifier were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample, 59% walked in the past week and greater walkability was associated with greater odds of walking (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.34). This association (<i>p</i> for interaction range 0.002-0.07) was present for those who were not currently married (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.56), who reported knee pain (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.72) or high depressive symptoms (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.60), or who had declining cognitive function (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.55).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>High walkability may influence physical activity, particularly for those with vulnerabilities related to social, pain, and brain health characteristics. These results should inform neighborhood planning and targeted interventions for vulnerable older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"8 11\",\"pages\":\"igae095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae095\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:邻里步行能力会影响老年人的步行行为。然而,由于对环境因素的脆弱性增加或复原力增强等因素的影响,不同的人口、社会经济、健康、社会和居住特征与步行的关联性可能会有所不同:在一个老年人样本(n = 493,中位年龄 = 82 [78-89],56% 为女性,31% 为黑人)中,通过对参与者邻近社区的谷歌街景图片进行审计,得出了步行能力指数。过去一周的步行情况为自我报告。根据人口统计学(年龄、种族、性别、婚姻状况)、社会经济学(教育、收入)、健康(步速、跌倒、膝关节疼痛、抑郁症状、认知状况、能量感知)、社会学(驾驶状况、社会参与)和居住/邻里(居住类型、邻里社会经济状况 [SES])的影响因素进行调节、在逻辑回归模型中,通过交互项对这些特征进行评估,并对性别、种族、步态速度、曾摔倒、抑郁症状严重、目前驾驶和认知状况进行调整。当出现效应修正时(交互作用结果的 p:在该样本中,59%的人在过去一周内步行,步行能力越强,步行几率越大(几率比 [OR] = 1.16,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.01-1.34)。目前尚未结婚(OR = 1.35,95% 置信区间:1.17-1.56)、报告膝关节疼痛(OR = 1.40,95% 置信区间:1.14-1.72)或抑郁症状严重(OR = 1.30,95% 置信区间:1.06-1.60)或认知功能下降(OR = 1.30,95% 置信区间:1.09-1.55)的人群也存在这种关联(交互作用的 P 值范围为 0.002-0.07):高步行能力可能会影响体育锻炼,尤其是对那些在社会、疼痛和大脑健康特征方面有弱点的人。这些结果应为社区规划和针对弱势老年人的干预措施提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Characteristics Modify the Relation of Neighborhood Walkability and Walking Behavior in Older Adults?

Background and objectives: Neighborhood walkability can influence walking behaviors in older adults. However, its associations of walkability with walking may differ by demographic, socioeconomic, health, social, and residential characteristics due to factors such as increased vulnerability to environmental factors or increased resilience.

Research design and methods: In a sample of older adults (n = 493, median age = 82 [range 78-89], 56% female, 31% Black), a walkability index was derived from audits of Google Street View images of participants' immediate neighborhoods. Walking was self-reported in the past week. Effect modifiers by demographic (age, race, gender, marital status), socioeconomic (education, income), health (gait speed, falls, knee pain, depressive symptoms, cognitive status, perceived energy), social (driving status, social engagement), and residential/neighborhood (residence type, neighborhood socioeconomic status [SES], population density) characteristics were assessed by interaction terms in logistic regression models, adjusted for gender, race, gait speed, prior falls, high depressive symptoms, currently driving, and cognitive status. When effect modification was suggested (p for interaction <.1), adjusted analyses of walkability with walking stratified on the effect modifier were conducted.

Results: In this sample, 59% walked in the past week and greater walkability was associated with greater odds of walking (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.34). This association (p for interaction range 0.002-0.07) was present for those who were not currently married (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17-1.56), who reported knee pain (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.72) or high depressive symptoms (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.60), or who had declining cognitive function (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.55).

Discussion and implications: High walkability may influence physical activity, particularly for those with vulnerabilities related to social, pain, and brain health characteristics. These results should inform neighborhood planning and targeted interventions for vulnerable older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
期刊最新文献
Life-Course Multidisciplinary Psychosocial Predictors of Dementia Among Older Adults: Results From the Health and Retirement Study. What Characteristics Modify the Relation of Neighborhood Walkability and Walking Behavior in Older Adults? Gender Selectively Mediates the Association Between Sex and Memory in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. The Effects of Social Interaction Intervention on Cognitive Functions Among Older Adults Without Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Association Between Social Isolation and Incident Dementia Among Older Adults: Evidence From National Health and Aging Trend Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1