新型芯片在成人肺炎病原体检测中的临床应用价值:中国多中心前瞻性研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2024-11-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IDR.S483256
Ruixue Zhang, Hui Xu, Xiaoxue Zhang, Hui Xiong, Fei Tang, Liping Lv, Xiangdong Mu, Wei Tian, Yueguang Cheng, JianRong Lu, Xiuhong Nie, Yang Guo, Yingying Liu, Zhi Zhang, Lianjun Lin
{"title":"新型芯片在成人肺炎病原体检测中的临床应用价值:中国多中心前瞻性研究。","authors":"Ruixue Zhang, Hui Xu, Xiaoxue Zhang, Hui Xiong, Fei Tang, Liping Lv, Xiangdong Mu, Wei Tian, Yueguang Cheng, JianRong Lu, Xiuhong Nie, Yang Guo, Yingying Liu, Zhi Zhang, Lianjun Lin","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S483256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The detection of pathogenic microorganisms plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of pneumonia that are responsible for a substantial number of deaths worldwide. However, conventional microbiological tests (CMT) have low accuracy and are time-consuming. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical value of Chips for Complicated Infection Detection (CCID) in detecting pneumonia pathogens.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at nine hospitals in China from January 2021 to September 2022. Respiratory samples from adult pneumonia patients were collected from each patient. CMT and CCID were performed in parallel to identify the pathogens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 245 patients were included, with 73% being elderly. CCID identified pathogenic microbes in 78.0% of patients and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) in 57.1% of the patients (p<0.001). The overall positive and negative percent agreements between CCID and CMT for pathogen detection were 90.07% and 38.46%, respectively. 38.8% of patients were diagnosed with mixed infections with at least two pathogens by CCID. Bacterial infections identified by CCID accounted for 60.0% of 245 patients, with the top 3 being Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecium, respectively. K. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in elderly patients, with a significantly higher prevalence compared to non-elderly patients (p = 0.0011). Among the 197 patients who had used antibiotics before sample collection, the positive rate of CCID was significantly higher than that of CMT (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that compared to CMT, this novel chip has significant advantages in detecting pathogens in pneumonia patients, especially in the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"17 ","pages":"4843-4852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Application Value of a Novel Chip in the Detection of Pathogens in Adult Pneumonia: A Multi-Centre Prospective Study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Ruixue Zhang, Hui Xu, Xiaoxue Zhang, Hui Xiong, Fei Tang, Liping Lv, Xiangdong Mu, Wei Tian, Yueguang Cheng, JianRong Lu, Xiuhong Nie, Yang Guo, Yingying Liu, Zhi Zhang, Lianjun Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IDR.S483256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The detection of pathogenic microorganisms plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of pneumonia that are responsible for a substantial number of deaths worldwide. However, conventional microbiological tests (CMT) have low accuracy and are time-consuming. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical value of Chips for Complicated Infection Detection (CCID) in detecting pneumonia pathogens.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at nine hospitals in China from January 2021 to September 2022. Respiratory samples from adult pneumonia patients were collected from each patient. CMT and CCID were performed in parallel to identify the pathogens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 245 patients were included, with 73% being elderly. CCID identified pathogenic microbes in 78.0% of patients and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) in 57.1% of the patients (p<0.001). The overall positive and negative percent agreements between CCID and CMT for pathogen detection were 90.07% and 38.46%, respectively. 38.8% of patients were diagnosed with mixed infections with at least two pathogens by CCID. Bacterial infections identified by CCID accounted for 60.0% of 245 patients, with the top 3 being Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecium, respectively. K. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in elderly patients, with a significantly higher prevalence compared to non-elderly patients (p = 0.0011). Among the 197 patients who had used antibiotics before sample collection, the positive rate of CCID was significantly higher than that of CMT (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that compared to CMT, this novel chip has significant advantages in detecting pathogens in pneumonia patients, especially in the elderly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"4843-4852\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549882/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S483256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S483256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:病原微生物的检测在肺炎的诊断和治疗中发挥着重要作用,肺炎是造成全球大量死亡的原因。然而,传统的微生物检验(CMT)准确性低且耗时。本研究旨在评估复杂感染检测芯片(CCID)在检测肺炎病原体方面的临床价值:本研究于 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月在中国九家医院进行。收集了每位成年肺炎患者的呼吸道样本。结果:共纳入 245 名患者:结果:共纳入 245 名患者,其中 73% 为老年人。78.0%的患者通过 CCID 确定了病原微生物,57.1%的患者通过传统微生物检验(CMT)确定了病原微生物(pCID):这项研究表明,与 CMT 相比,这种新型芯片在检测肺炎患者(尤其是老年人)的病原体方面具有显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Clinical Application Value of a Novel Chip in the Detection of Pathogens in Adult Pneumonia: A Multi-Centre Prospective Study in China.

Purpose: The detection of pathogenic microorganisms plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of pneumonia that are responsible for a substantial number of deaths worldwide. However, conventional microbiological tests (CMT) have low accuracy and are time-consuming. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical value of Chips for Complicated Infection Detection (CCID) in detecting pneumonia pathogens.

Patients and methods: This study was conducted at nine hospitals in China from January 2021 to September 2022. Respiratory samples from adult pneumonia patients were collected from each patient. CMT and CCID were performed in parallel to identify the pathogens.

Results: A total of 245 patients were included, with 73% being elderly. CCID identified pathogenic microbes in 78.0% of patients and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) in 57.1% of the patients (p<0.001). The overall positive and negative percent agreements between CCID and CMT for pathogen detection were 90.07% and 38.46%, respectively. 38.8% of patients were diagnosed with mixed infections with at least two pathogens by CCID. Bacterial infections identified by CCID accounted for 60.0% of 245 patients, with the top 3 being Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecium, respectively. K. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in elderly patients, with a significantly higher prevalence compared to non-elderly patients (p = 0.0011). Among the 197 patients who had used antibiotics before sample collection, the positive rate of CCID was significantly higher than that of CMT (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study indicates that compared to CMT, this novel chip has significant advantages in detecting pathogens in pneumonia patients, especially in the elderly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
期刊最新文献
Cefiderocol in the Successful Treatment of Complicated Hospital-Acquired K. pneumoniae NDM, OXA48 Intraabdominal Infection. Five Years' Experience with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Among Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Study from Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Tuberculous Spondylitis and Paravertebral Abscess Formation Following Vertebroplasty: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. A Novel Variant of KPC-179 Conferring Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance in a Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate. Prevalence and Molecular Characteristics of 16S rRNA Methylase Genes in Clinical Isolates of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1