Ruixue Zhang, Hui Xu, Xiaoxue Zhang, Hui Xiong, Fei Tang, Liping Lv, Xiangdong Mu, Wei Tian, Yueguang Cheng, JianRong Lu, Xiuhong Nie, Yang Guo, Yingying Liu, Zhi Zhang, Lianjun Lin
{"title":"新型芯片在成人肺炎病原体检测中的临床应用价值:中国多中心前瞻性研究。","authors":"Ruixue Zhang, Hui Xu, Xiaoxue Zhang, Hui Xiong, Fei Tang, Liping Lv, Xiangdong Mu, Wei Tian, Yueguang Cheng, JianRong Lu, Xiuhong Nie, Yang Guo, Yingying Liu, Zhi Zhang, Lianjun Lin","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S483256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The detection of pathogenic microorganisms plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of pneumonia that are responsible for a substantial number of deaths worldwide. However, conventional microbiological tests (CMT) have low accuracy and are time-consuming. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical value of Chips for Complicated Infection Detection (CCID) in detecting pneumonia pathogens.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at nine hospitals in China from January 2021 to September 2022. Respiratory samples from adult pneumonia patients were collected from each patient. CMT and CCID were performed in parallel to identify the pathogens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 245 patients were included, with 73% being elderly. CCID identified pathogenic microbes in 78.0% of patients and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) in 57.1% of the patients (p<0.001). The overall positive and negative percent agreements between CCID and CMT for pathogen detection were 90.07% and 38.46%, respectively. 38.8% of patients were diagnosed with mixed infections with at least two pathogens by CCID. Bacterial infections identified by CCID accounted for 60.0% of 245 patients, with the top 3 being Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecium, respectively. K. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in elderly patients, with a significantly higher prevalence compared to non-elderly patients (p = 0.0011). Among the 197 patients who had used antibiotics before sample collection, the positive rate of CCID was significantly higher than that of CMT (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that compared to CMT, this novel chip has significant advantages in detecting pathogens in pneumonia patients, especially in the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"17 ","pages":"4843-4852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Application Value of a Novel Chip in the Detection of Pathogens in Adult Pneumonia: A Multi-Centre Prospective Study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Ruixue Zhang, Hui Xu, Xiaoxue Zhang, Hui Xiong, Fei Tang, Liping Lv, Xiangdong Mu, Wei Tian, Yueguang Cheng, JianRong Lu, Xiuhong Nie, Yang Guo, Yingying Liu, Zhi Zhang, Lianjun Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IDR.S483256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The detection of pathogenic microorganisms plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of pneumonia that are responsible for a substantial number of deaths worldwide. However, conventional microbiological tests (CMT) have low accuracy and are time-consuming. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical value of Chips for Complicated Infection Detection (CCID) in detecting pneumonia pathogens.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was conducted at nine hospitals in China from January 2021 to September 2022. Respiratory samples from adult pneumonia patients were collected from each patient. CMT and CCID were performed in parallel to identify the pathogens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 245 patients were included, with 73% being elderly. CCID identified pathogenic microbes in 78.0% of patients and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) in 57.1% of the patients (p<0.001). The overall positive and negative percent agreements between CCID and CMT for pathogen detection were 90.07% and 38.46%, respectively. 38.8% of patients were diagnosed with mixed infections with at least two pathogens by CCID. Bacterial infections identified by CCID accounted for 60.0% of 245 patients, with the top 3 being Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecium, respectively. K. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in elderly patients, with a significantly higher prevalence compared to non-elderly patients (p = 0.0011). Among the 197 patients who had used antibiotics before sample collection, the positive rate of CCID was significantly higher than that of CMT (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that compared to CMT, this novel chip has significant advantages in detecting pathogens in pneumonia patients, especially in the elderly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"4843-4852\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549882/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S483256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S483256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Clinical Application Value of a Novel Chip in the Detection of Pathogens in Adult Pneumonia: A Multi-Centre Prospective Study in China.
Purpose: The detection of pathogenic microorganisms plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of pneumonia that are responsible for a substantial number of deaths worldwide. However, conventional microbiological tests (CMT) have low accuracy and are time-consuming. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical value of Chips for Complicated Infection Detection (CCID) in detecting pneumonia pathogens.
Patients and methods: This study was conducted at nine hospitals in China from January 2021 to September 2022. Respiratory samples from adult pneumonia patients were collected from each patient. CMT and CCID were performed in parallel to identify the pathogens.
Results: A total of 245 patients were included, with 73% being elderly. CCID identified pathogenic microbes in 78.0% of patients and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) in 57.1% of the patients (p<0.001). The overall positive and negative percent agreements between CCID and CMT for pathogen detection were 90.07% and 38.46%, respectively. 38.8% of patients were diagnosed with mixed infections with at least two pathogens by CCID. Bacterial infections identified by CCID accounted for 60.0% of 245 patients, with the top 3 being Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecium, respectively. K. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in elderly patients, with a significantly higher prevalence compared to non-elderly patients (p = 0.0011). Among the 197 patients who had used antibiotics before sample collection, the positive rate of CCID was significantly higher than that of CMT (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study indicates that compared to CMT, this novel chip has significant advantages in detecting pathogens in pneumonia patients, especially in the elderly.
期刊介绍:
About Journal
Editors
Peer Reviewers
Articles
Article Publishing Charges
Aims and Scope
Call For Papers
ISSN: 1178-6973
Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony
An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.