不同浓度的洗必泰在口腔护理实践中对消泡剂的影响:系统综述与网络元分析》。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International journal of dental hygiene Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1111/idh.12878
Shiqi Liang, Yirong He, Xinrong Chen, Menghang Wu, Ka Li
{"title":"不同浓度的洗必泰在口腔护理实践中对消泡剂的影响:系统综述与网络元分析》。","authors":"Shiqi Liang, Yirong He, Xinrong Chen, Menghang Wu, Ka Li","doi":"10.1111/idh.12878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the anti-plaque effects and adverse effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine (CHX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, OVID Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of different concentrations of CHX in healthy populations. Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed to summarise the evidence, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Cohen's d standardised mean differences were calculated as the measure of effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight RCTs involving 2011 participants and six concentrations of CHX (0.2%, 0.12%, 0.1%, 0.3%, 1% and 0.06%) were included. The anti-plaque effects of CHX at all concentrations were compared with placebo. Moderate to very low certainty evidence established 0.2% CHX as the most effective on anti-plaque. 0.12% and 0.1% CHX also showed significant anti-plaque effects. However, the ranking probabilities showed that the adverse effects of 0.12% and 0.1% CHX were < 0.2% CHX.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with placebo, 0.2%, 0.12% and 0.1% CHX had significant anti-plaque effects, with moderate to very low certainty evidence that 0.2% CHX was most effective on anti-plaque. However, 0.2% CHX had larger adverse effects than 0.12% and 0.1% CHX.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: Number CRD: 42022327083.</p>","PeriodicalId":13791,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dental hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Concentrations of Chlorhexidine on Anti-Plaque in Oral Care Practice: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shiqi Liang, Yirong He, Xinrong Chen, Menghang Wu, Ka Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/idh.12878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the anti-plaque effects and adverse effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine (CHX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, OVID Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of different concentrations of CHX in healthy populations. Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed to summarise the evidence, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Cohen's d standardised mean differences were calculated as the measure of effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight RCTs involving 2011 participants and six concentrations of CHX (0.2%, 0.12%, 0.1%, 0.3%, 1% and 0.06%) were included. The anti-plaque effects of CHX at all concentrations were compared with placebo. Moderate to very low certainty evidence established 0.2% CHX as the most effective on anti-plaque. 0.12% and 0.1% CHX also showed significant anti-plaque effects. However, the ranking probabilities showed that the adverse effects of 0.12% and 0.1% CHX were < 0.2% CHX.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with placebo, 0.2%, 0.12% and 0.1% CHX had significant anti-plaque effects, with moderate to very low certainty evidence that 0.2% CHX was most effective on anti-plaque. However, 0.2% CHX had larger adverse effects than 0.12% and 0.1% CHX.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: Number CRD: 42022327083.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of dental hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of dental hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12878\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本网络荟萃分析旨在比较不同浓度的洗必泰(CHX)的抗牙菌斑效果和不良反应:方法:在PubMed、OVID Embase和Cochrane图书馆检索了从开始到2023年10月在健康人群中使用不同浓度CHX的随机对照试验(RCT)。随机效应网络荟萃分析用于总结证据,建议分级评估、发展和评价框架用于评定证据的确定性。科恩氏 d 标准化平均差被计算为衡量效应大小的指标:共纳入了 38 项 RCT,涉及 2011 名参与者和六种浓度的 CHX(0.2%、0.12%、0.1%、0.3%、1% 和 0.06%)。所有浓度的CHX抗斑块效果均与安慰剂进行了比较。中度至极度不确定的证据表明,0.2% CHX 的抗斑块效果最好。0.12% 和 0.1% CHX 也显示出显著的抗斑块效果。不过,排序概率显示,0.12% 和 0.1% CHX 的不良反应是结论:与安慰剂相比,0.2%、0.12% 和 0.1% CHX 具有显著的抗斑块作用,中度到极低的确定性证据表明 0.2% CHX 的抗斑块效果最好。不过,与 0.12% 和 0.1% CHX 相比,0.2% CHX 的不良反应更大:试验注册:PROSPERO:编号 CRD:42022327083。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Different Concentrations of Chlorhexidine on Anti-Plaque in Oral Care Practice: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the anti-plaque effects and adverse effects of different concentrations of chlorhexidine (CHX).

Methods: PubMed, OVID Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of different concentrations of CHX in healthy populations. Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed to summarise the evidence, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Cohen's d standardised mean differences were calculated as the measure of effect size.

Results: Thirty-eight RCTs involving 2011 participants and six concentrations of CHX (0.2%, 0.12%, 0.1%, 0.3%, 1% and 0.06%) were included. The anti-plaque effects of CHX at all concentrations were compared with placebo. Moderate to very low certainty evidence established 0.2% CHX as the most effective on anti-plaque. 0.12% and 0.1% CHX also showed significant anti-plaque effects. However, the ranking probabilities showed that the adverse effects of 0.12% and 0.1% CHX were < 0.2% CHX.

Conclusions: Compared with placebo, 0.2%, 0.12% and 0.1% CHX had significant anti-plaque effects, with moderate to very low certainty evidence that 0.2% CHX was most effective on anti-plaque. However, 0.2% CHX had larger adverse effects than 0.12% and 0.1% CHX.

Trial registration: PROSPERO: Number CRD: 42022327083.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of dental hygiene
International journal of dental hygiene DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Dental Hygiene is the official scientific peer-reviewed journal of the International Federation of Dental Hygienists (IFDH). The journal brings the latest scientific news, high quality commissioned reviews as well as clinical, professional and educational developmental and legislative news to the profession world-wide. Thus, it acts as a forum for exchange of relevant information and enhancement of the profession with the purpose of promoting oral health for patients and communities. The aim of the International Journal of Dental Hygiene is to provide a forum for exchange of scientific knowledge in the field of oral health and dental hygiene. A further aim is to support and facilitate the application of new knowledge into clinical practice. The journal welcomes original research, reviews and case reports as well as clinical, professional, educational and legislative news to the profession world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Construct Validity of the Orientation to Life Questionnaire in a General Adult Population in Norway and Its Association with Self-Reported General and Oral Health. Dental Hygienists' Readiness to Perform Resin Infiltrations: A Qualitative Study From Finland. Gingivitis Control in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease by a Need-Related Programme: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Sex Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer-A Prospective Study. The Experiences of Implementing a Near-Peer Teaching Scheme Into an Undergraduate Dental Hygiene and Dental Therapy Programme at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1