卵巢癌患者保留生育力治疗的肿瘤安全性:西班牙多中心研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.16026
Marta Heras, Leticia Azcona, Octavio Arencibia, Lucas Minig, Lola Marti, Alicia Hernandez, Arantxa Lekuona, Isabel Niguez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez, Berta Diaz-Feijoo, Laia Ribot, Maria Nieves Cabezas, Marta Lamarca, Monica Bellon, Amira Alkourdi, Laura Cardenas, Ana Boldo, Joana Amengual, Mikel Gorostidi, Ignacio Zapardiel
{"title":"卵巢癌患者保留生育力治疗的肿瘤安全性:西班牙多中心研究。","authors":"Marta Heras, Leticia Azcona, Octavio Arencibia, Lucas Minig, Lola Marti, Alicia Hernandez, Arantxa Lekuona, Isabel Niguez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez, Berta Diaz-Feijoo, Laia Ribot, Maria Nieves Cabezas, Marta Lamarca, Monica Bellon, Amira Alkourdi, Laura Cardenas, Ana Boldo, Joana Amengual, Mikel Gorostidi, Ignacio Zapardiel","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage ovarian cancer in women younger than 40 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective multicenter study including women aged 18-40 years diagnosed with early-stage (FIGO I-II) ovarian cancer in 55 Spanish hospitals, from January 2010 to December 2019. Benign and borderline tumors were excluded, as well as advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). All perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Standard staging surgery (SSS) was compared with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 366 women were included; 327 (89.3%) were stage I. Among all patients, 216 (59%) underwent SSS and 150 (41%) FSS. Up to 208 (56.8%) patients did not have children, but only 12 (3.2%) had oocyte preservation before treatment. Patients in the FSS group compared with the SSS group showed a non-significant difference in recurrences (8% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P < 0.711) and deaths (1.3% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.211) during the follow-up. No significant differences were found between epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancer both in recurrences (7.1% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.771) and in deaths (1.4% vs. 1.3%, respectively; P = 1) among patients who underwent FSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FSS seems a safe option for treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer in patients who want to preserve fertility, either for epithelial and non-epithelial histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Heras, Leticia Azcona, Octavio Arencibia, Lucas Minig, Lola Marti, Alicia Hernandez, Arantxa Lekuona, Isabel Niguez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez, Berta Diaz-Feijoo, Laia Ribot, Maria Nieves Cabezas, Marta Lamarca, Monica Bellon, Amira Alkourdi, Laura Cardenas, Ana Boldo, Joana Amengual, Mikel Gorostidi, Ignacio Zapardiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.16026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage ovarian cancer in women younger than 40 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective multicenter study including women aged 18-40 years diagnosed with early-stage (FIGO I-II) ovarian cancer in 55 Spanish hospitals, from January 2010 to December 2019. Benign and borderline tumors were excluded, as well as advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). All perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Standard staging surgery (SSS) was compared with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 366 women were included; 327 (89.3%) were stage I. Among all patients, 216 (59%) underwent SSS and 150 (41%) FSS. Up to 208 (56.8%) patients did not have children, but only 12 (3.2%) had oocyte preservation before treatment. Patients in the FSS group compared with the SSS group showed a non-significant difference in recurrences (8% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P < 0.711) and deaths (1.3% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.211) during the follow-up. No significant differences were found between epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancer both in recurrences (7.1% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.771) and in deaths (1.4% vs. 1.3%, respectively; P = 1) among patients who underwent FSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FSS seems a safe option for treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer in patients who want to preserve fertility, either for epithelial and non-epithelial histology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估40岁以下女性接受早期卵巢癌保胎治疗的安全性:我们开展了一项回顾性多中心研究,研究对象包括 2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在 55 家西班牙医院确诊为早期(FIGO I-II)卵巢癌的 18-40 岁女性。良性肿瘤和边缘性肿瘤以及晚期(FIGO III-IV)肿瘤均被排除在外。收集并分析了所有围手术期特征和随访数据。就肿瘤学结果而言,标准分期手术(SSS)与保孕手术(FSS)进行了比较:所有患者中有 216 人(59%)接受了标准分期手术,150 人(41%)接受了保胎手术。多达 208 名(56.8%)患者没有生育,但只有 12 名(3.2%)患者在治疗前进行了卵母细胞保存。与 SSS 组相比,FSS 组患者的复发率无显著差异(分别为 8%和 9.3%;P 结论:FSS 似乎是一种安全的治疗方案:对于希望保留生育能力的早期卵巢癌患者,无论是上皮组织学还是非上皮组织学,FSS 似乎都是一种安全的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study.

Objective: To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage ovarian cancer in women younger than 40 years old.

Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study including women aged 18-40 years diagnosed with early-stage (FIGO I-II) ovarian cancer in 55 Spanish hospitals, from January 2010 to December 2019. Benign and borderline tumors were excluded, as well as advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). All perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Standard staging surgery (SSS) was compared with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of oncological outcomes.

Results: In all, 366 women were included; 327 (89.3%) were stage I. Among all patients, 216 (59%) underwent SSS and 150 (41%) FSS. Up to 208 (56.8%) patients did not have children, but only 12 (3.2%) had oocyte preservation before treatment. Patients in the FSS group compared with the SSS group showed a non-significant difference in recurrences (8% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P < 0.711) and deaths (1.3% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.211) during the follow-up. No significant differences were found between epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancer both in recurrences (7.1% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.771) and in deaths (1.4% vs. 1.3%, respectively; P = 1) among patients who underwent FSS.

Conclusion: FSS seems a safe option for treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer in patients who want to preserve fertility, either for epithelial and non-epithelial histology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study. Proposal for a new classification of intrauterine adhesions by sites. Retraction: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of a Cervical Traction Maneuver (Amr's Maneuver) on the Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Retracted: Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1