Marta Heras, Leticia Azcona, Octavio Arencibia, Lucas Minig, Lola Marti, Alicia Hernandez, Arantxa Lekuona, Isabel Niguez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez, Berta Diaz-Feijoo, Laia Ribot, Maria Nieves Cabezas, Marta Lamarca, Monica Bellon, Amira Alkourdi, Laura Cardenas, Ana Boldo, Joana Amengual, Mikel Gorostidi, Ignacio Zapardiel
{"title":"卵巢癌患者保留生育力治疗的肿瘤安全性:西班牙多中心研究。","authors":"Marta Heras, Leticia Azcona, Octavio Arencibia, Lucas Minig, Lola Marti, Alicia Hernandez, Arantxa Lekuona, Isabel Niguez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez, Berta Diaz-Feijoo, Laia Ribot, Maria Nieves Cabezas, Marta Lamarca, Monica Bellon, Amira Alkourdi, Laura Cardenas, Ana Boldo, Joana Amengual, Mikel Gorostidi, Ignacio Zapardiel","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage ovarian cancer in women younger than 40 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective multicenter study including women aged 18-40 years diagnosed with early-stage (FIGO I-II) ovarian cancer in 55 Spanish hospitals, from January 2010 to December 2019. Benign and borderline tumors were excluded, as well as advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). All perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Standard staging surgery (SSS) was compared with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 366 women were included; 327 (89.3%) were stage I. Among all patients, 216 (59%) underwent SSS and 150 (41%) FSS. Up to 208 (56.8%) patients did not have children, but only 12 (3.2%) had oocyte preservation before treatment. Patients in the FSS group compared with the SSS group showed a non-significant difference in recurrences (8% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P < 0.711) and deaths (1.3% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.211) during the follow-up. No significant differences were found between epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancer both in recurrences (7.1% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.771) and in deaths (1.4% vs. 1.3%, respectively; P = 1) among patients who underwent FSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FSS seems a safe option for treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer in patients who want to preserve fertility, either for epithelial and non-epithelial histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Heras, Leticia Azcona, Octavio Arencibia, Lucas Minig, Lola Marti, Alicia Hernandez, Arantxa Lekuona, Isabel Niguez, Blanca Gil-Ibañez, Berta Diaz-Feijoo, Laia Ribot, Maria Nieves Cabezas, Marta Lamarca, Monica Bellon, Amira Alkourdi, Laura Cardenas, Ana Boldo, Joana Amengual, Mikel Gorostidi, Ignacio Zapardiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.16026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage ovarian cancer in women younger than 40 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective multicenter study including women aged 18-40 years diagnosed with early-stage (FIGO I-II) ovarian cancer in 55 Spanish hospitals, from January 2010 to December 2019. Benign and borderline tumors were excluded, as well as advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). All perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Standard staging surgery (SSS) was compared with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 366 women were included; 327 (89.3%) were stage I. Among all patients, 216 (59%) underwent SSS and 150 (41%) FSS. Up to 208 (56.8%) patients did not have children, but only 12 (3.2%) had oocyte preservation before treatment. Patients in the FSS group compared with the SSS group showed a non-significant difference in recurrences (8% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P < 0.711) and deaths (1.3% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.211) during the follow-up. No significant differences were found between epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancer both in recurrences (7.1% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.771) and in deaths (1.4% vs. 1.3%, respectively; P = 1) among patients who underwent FSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FSS seems a safe option for treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer in patients who want to preserve fertility, either for epithelial and non-epithelial histology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study.
Objective: To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage ovarian cancer in women younger than 40 years old.
Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study including women aged 18-40 years diagnosed with early-stage (FIGO I-II) ovarian cancer in 55 Spanish hospitals, from January 2010 to December 2019. Benign and borderline tumors were excluded, as well as advanced stages (FIGO III-IV). All perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Standard staging surgery (SSS) was compared with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in terms of oncological outcomes.
Results: In all, 366 women were included; 327 (89.3%) were stage I. Among all patients, 216 (59%) underwent SSS and 150 (41%) FSS. Up to 208 (56.8%) patients did not have children, but only 12 (3.2%) had oocyte preservation before treatment. Patients in the FSS group compared with the SSS group showed a non-significant difference in recurrences (8% vs. 9.3%, respectively; P < 0.711) and deaths (1.3% vs. 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.211) during the follow-up. No significant differences were found between epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancer both in recurrences (7.1% vs. 8.8%, respectively; P = 0.771) and in deaths (1.4% vs. 1.3%, respectively; P = 1) among patients who underwent FSS.
Conclusion: FSS seems a safe option for treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer in patients who want to preserve fertility, either for epithelial and non-epithelial histology.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.