Fionnuala Murray, Okhee Yoo, Samuel Brophy-Williams, Matthew Rawlins, Steven C Wallis, Jason A Roberts, Edward Raby, Sam Salman, Laurens Manning
{"title":"皮下注射美罗培南替代静脉注射的安全性、耐受性和药代动力学。","authors":"Fionnuala Murray, Okhee Yoo, Samuel Brophy-Williams, Matthew Rawlins, Steven C Wallis, Jason A Roberts, Edward Raby, Sam Salman, Laurens Manning","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkae398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subcutaneous delivery of antibiotics is a practical alternative to IV administration. Meropenem is commonly used to treat infections caused by resistant Gram-negative organisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, crossover self-controlled study in 11 stable inpatients established on meropenem. Participants received a single dose of subcutaneous meropenem, in 50 mL normal saline via gravity feed. Venous blood sampling was performed at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h following the subcutaneous and IV doses. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Pain scores and infusion site reactions (oedema/erythema) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subcutaneous meropenem was well tolerated. The bioavailability of subcutaneous administration was 81.5% (95% CI 71.6%-93.2%). Increasing BMI was associated with slower absorption from subcutaneous tissue. Compared with IV, subcutaneous administration resulted in lower peak and higher trough concentrations. Despite the lower bioavailability observed, the PTA for free drug concentrations greater than the MIC for more than 40% of the time between doses was higher for subcutaneous than IV administration at MIC values between 0.03 and 8 mg/L. Simulated subcutaneous doses of 1.5 g twice daily, or 3 g continuous 24 h infusion had improved PTA relative to standard IV dosing of 1 g three times daily.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subcutaneous meropenem appears to be well tolerated and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. Either 1.5 g twice daily or 3 g as a 24 h subcutaneous infusion could be considered for future evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous meropenem as an alternative to intravenous administration.\",\"authors\":\"Fionnuala Murray, Okhee Yoo, Samuel Brophy-Williams, Matthew Rawlins, Steven C Wallis, Jason A Roberts, Edward Raby, Sam Salman, Laurens Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkae398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subcutaneous delivery of antibiotics is a practical alternative to IV administration. Meropenem is commonly used to treat infections caused by resistant Gram-negative organisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, crossover self-controlled study in 11 stable inpatients established on meropenem. Participants received a single dose of subcutaneous meropenem, in 50 mL normal saline via gravity feed. Venous blood sampling was performed at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h following the subcutaneous and IV doses. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Pain scores and infusion site reactions (oedema/erythema) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subcutaneous meropenem was well tolerated. The bioavailability of subcutaneous administration was 81.5% (95% CI 71.6%-93.2%). Increasing BMI was associated with slower absorption from subcutaneous tissue. Compared with IV, subcutaneous administration resulted in lower peak and higher trough concentrations. Despite the lower bioavailability observed, the PTA for free drug concentrations greater than the MIC for more than 40% of the time between doses was higher for subcutaneous than IV administration at MIC values between 0.03 and 8 mg/L. Simulated subcutaneous doses of 1.5 g twice daily, or 3 g continuous 24 h infusion had improved PTA relative to standard IV dosing of 1 g three times daily.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subcutaneous meropenem appears to be well tolerated and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. Either 1.5 g twice daily or 3 g as a 24 h subcutaneous infusion could be considered for future evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae398\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:皮下注射抗生素是静脉注射的一种实用替代方法。美罗培南常用于治疗耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起的感染:这是一项前瞻性、交叉自我对照研究,研究对象为 11 名使用美罗培南的稳定期住院患者。参与者通过重力给药方式接受单剂量皮下注射美罗培南(50 毫升生理盐水)。分别在基线、皮下注射和静脉注射后的 0.5、1、2、4 和 8 小时进行静脉采血。使用 UPLC-MS/MS 测定抗生素浓度。药代动力学数据采用非线性混合效应模型方法进行分析。对疼痛评分和输液部位反应(水肿/红斑)进行了评估:结果:皮下注射美罗培南的耐受性良好。皮下注射的生物利用度为 81.5%(95% CI 71.6%-93.2%)。体重指数(BMI)的增加与皮下组织吸收较慢有关。与静脉注射相比,皮下注射的峰浓度较低,谷浓度较高。尽管观察到的生物利用率较低,但在 MIC 值介于 0.03 至 8 毫克/升之间时,皮下注射比静脉注射的自由药物浓度高于 MIC 的 PTA 值高。与每天三次每次1克的标准静脉注射剂量相比,每天两次每次1.5克或连续24小时输注3克的模拟皮下注射剂量的PTA有所提高:结论:皮下注射美罗培南的耐受性良好,药代动力学特征良好。结论:皮下注射美罗培南的耐受性良好,药代动力学特征良好,可考虑将 1.5 克每天两次或 3 克 24 小时皮下注射用于未来的评估。
Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous meropenem as an alternative to intravenous administration.
Background: Subcutaneous delivery of antibiotics is a practical alternative to IV administration. Meropenem is commonly used to treat infections caused by resistant Gram-negative organisms.
Methods: This was a prospective, crossover self-controlled study in 11 stable inpatients established on meropenem. Participants received a single dose of subcutaneous meropenem, in 50 mL normal saline via gravity feed. Venous blood sampling was performed at baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h following the subcutaneous and IV doses. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Pain scores and infusion site reactions (oedema/erythema) were assessed.
Results: Subcutaneous meropenem was well tolerated. The bioavailability of subcutaneous administration was 81.5% (95% CI 71.6%-93.2%). Increasing BMI was associated with slower absorption from subcutaneous tissue. Compared with IV, subcutaneous administration resulted in lower peak and higher trough concentrations. Despite the lower bioavailability observed, the PTA for free drug concentrations greater than the MIC for more than 40% of the time between doses was higher for subcutaneous than IV administration at MIC values between 0.03 and 8 mg/L. Simulated subcutaneous doses of 1.5 g twice daily, or 3 g continuous 24 h infusion had improved PTA relative to standard IV dosing of 1 g three times daily.
Conclusions: Subcutaneous meropenem appears to be well tolerated and has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. Either 1.5 g twice daily or 3 g as a 24 h subcutaneous infusion could be considered for future evaluation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.