小儿神经源性膀胱患者使用家用膀胱测压仪的经验和障碍:定性研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.10.017
Amanda M Macaraeg, Sara M Alshehabi, Kathy H Huen, Carol A Davis-Dao, Sarah H Williamson, Timothy C Boswell, Christina Chalmers, Heidi A Stephany, Kai-Wen Chuang, Elias J Wehbi, Zeev N Kain, Sherrie H Kaplan, Antoine E Khoury
{"title":"小儿神经源性膀胱患者使用家用膀胱测压仪的经验和障碍:定性研究。","authors":"Amanda M Macaraeg, Sara M Alshehabi, Kathy H Huen, Carol A Davis-Dao, Sarah H Williamson, Timothy C Boswell, Christina Chalmers, Heidi A Stephany, Kai-Wen Chuang, Elias J Wehbi, Zeev N Kain, Sherrie H Kaplan, Antoine E Khoury","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with neurogenic bladder are at risk of developing renal deterioration secondary to increased intravesical pressures. To date, urodynamics is the gold standard test to properly assess bladder dynamics. Home bladder manometry is a low-cost and simple method to evaluate bladder pressures and volumes during clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Previous literature has shown that home manometry measurements correlate with urodynamic pressures and hydronephrosis on ultrasound. However, no studies have evaluated the challenges and barriers faced by caregivers with the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to investigate the experiences and perceptions of caregivers, healthcare providers, and nurses with home manometry.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 23 stakeholders. Stakeholders included caregivers of pediatric spina bifida neurogenic bladder patients, providers, and nursing staff. Grounded Theory Methods were used to analyze transcripts and identify preliminary concepts that described attitudes towards the current home bladder manometry process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview participants were composed of 10 (43 %) caregivers, 9 (40 %) healthcare providers, and 4 (17 %) nursing staff. The mean age was 39 years (range 26-66). The four themes identified during discussions were perspectives on home manometry, patient-specific characteristics, challenges with home manometry, and learning experience. All caregivers expressed understanding and agreement with the purpose and importance of home manometry. Emergent concepts identified as targets for improvement were the need for standardization of teaching processes with focus on hands-on practice, understanding of patient characteristics and the home environment that make the process more challenging, and the need for appropriate materials including extension tubing and catheters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home bladder manometry is a feasible and beneficial way for neurogenic bladder patients to monitor their bladder pressures and volumes at home. This qualitative study offers valuable insights into the experiences and viewpoints of caregivers, healthcare providers, and nurses regarding both home manometry and the general experience with CIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and barriers with home bladder manometry in the pediatric neurogenic bladder population: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda M Macaraeg, Sara M Alshehabi, Kathy H Huen, Carol A Davis-Dao, Sarah H Williamson, Timothy C Boswell, Christina Chalmers, Heidi A Stephany, Kai-Wen Chuang, Elias J Wehbi, Zeev N Kain, Sherrie H Kaplan, Antoine E Khoury\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.10.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with neurogenic bladder are at risk of developing renal deterioration secondary to increased intravesical pressures. To date, urodynamics is the gold standard test to properly assess bladder dynamics. Home bladder manometry is a low-cost and simple method to evaluate bladder pressures and volumes during clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Previous literature has shown that home manometry measurements correlate with urodynamic pressures and hydronephrosis on ultrasound. However, no studies have evaluated the challenges and barriers faced by caregivers with the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to investigate the experiences and perceptions of caregivers, healthcare providers, and nurses with home manometry.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 23 stakeholders. Stakeholders included caregivers of pediatric spina bifida neurogenic bladder patients, providers, and nursing staff. Grounded Theory Methods were used to analyze transcripts and identify preliminary concepts that described attitudes towards the current home bladder manometry process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview participants were composed of 10 (43 %) caregivers, 9 (40 %) healthcare providers, and 4 (17 %) nursing staff. The mean age was 39 years (range 26-66). The four themes identified during discussions were perspectives on home manometry, patient-specific characteristics, challenges with home manometry, and learning experience. All caregivers expressed understanding and agreement with the purpose and importance of home manometry. Emergent concepts identified as targets for improvement were the need for standardization of teaching processes with focus on hands-on practice, understanding of patient characteristics and the home environment that make the process more challenging, and the need for appropriate materials including extension tubing and catheters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home bladder manometry is a feasible and beneficial way for neurogenic bladder patients to monitor their bladder pressures and volumes at home. This qualitative study offers valuable insights into the experiences and viewpoints of caregivers, healthcare providers, and nurses regarding both home manometry and the general experience with CIC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.10.017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.10.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经源性膀胱患者有可能因膀胱内压升高而导致肾功能恶化。迄今为止,尿动力学检查是正确评估膀胱动态的金标准检查。家庭膀胱测压是一种低成本、简单的方法,用于评估清洁间歇导尿(CIC)过程中的膀胱压力和容量。以往的文献显示,家用测压法测量的结果与超声检查的尿动力学压力和肾积水相关。但是,还没有研究对护理人员在这一过程中所面临的挑战和障碍进行评估:我们的目的是调查护理人员、医疗服务提供者和护士对家庭测压的经验和看法:我们对 23 位利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论。利益相关者包括小儿脊柱裂神经源性膀胱患者的护理人员、医疗服务提供者和护理人员。研究人员采用基础理论方法对访谈记录进行分析,并确定了描述当前家庭膀胱测压过程态度的初步概念:访谈参与者包括 10 名护理人员(43%)、9 名医疗服务提供者(40%)和 4 名护理人员(17%)。平均年龄为 39 岁(26-66 岁不等)。讨论中确定的四个主题是:对家庭测压的看法、患者的具体特征、家庭测压面临的挑战和学习经验。所有护理人员都表示理解并同意家庭测压的目的和重要性。作为改进目标的新概念是:需要将教学过程标准化,重点放在动手实践上;了解患者的特点和家庭环境,因为这些特点和环境会使这一过程更具挑战性;需要适当的材料,包括延长管和导尿管:家庭膀胱测压是神经源性膀胱患者在家中监测膀胱压力和容量的一种可行且有益的方法。这项定性研究为了解护理人员、医疗服务提供者和护士在家庭膀胱测压和 CIC 一般体验方面的经验和观点提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences and barriers with home bladder manometry in the pediatric neurogenic bladder population: A qualitative study.

Background: Patients with neurogenic bladder are at risk of developing renal deterioration secondary to increased intravesical pressures. To date, urodynamics is the gold standard test to properly assess bladder dynamics. Home bladder manometry is a low-cost and simple method to evaluate bladder pressures and volumes during clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Previous literature has shown that home manometry measurements correlate with urodynamic pressures and hydronephrosis on ultrasound. However, no studies have evaluated the challenges and barriers faced by caregivers with the process.

Objective: Our objective was to investigate the experiences and perceptions of caregivers, healthcare providers, and nurses with home manometry.

Study design: We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 23 stakeholders. Stakeholders included caregivers of pediatric spina bifida neurogenic bladder patients, providers, and nursing staff. Grounded Theory Methods were used to analyze transcripts and identify preliminary concepts that described attitudes towards the current home bladder manometry process.

Results: Interview participants were composed of 10 (43 %) caregivers, 9 (40 %) healthcare providers, and 4 (17 %) nursing staff. The mean age was 39 years (range 26-66). The four themes identified during discussions were perspectives on home manometry, patient-specific characteristics, challenges with home manometry, and learning experience. All caregivers expressed understanding and agreement with the purpose and importance of home manometry. Emergent concepts identified as targets for improvement were the need for standardization of teaching processes with focus on hands-on practice, understanding of patient characteristics and the home environment that make the process more challenging, and the need for appropriate materials including extension tubing and catheters.

Conclusions: Home bladder manometry is a feasible and beneficial way for neurogenic bladder patients to monitor their bladder pressures and volumes at home. This qualitative study offers valuable insights into the experiences and viewpoints of caregivers, healthcare providers, and nurses regarding both home manometry and the general experience with CIC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
期刊最新文献
Pediatric penile anthropometry nomogram: Establishing standardized reference values. ChatGPT-4o's performance on pediatric Vesicoureteral reflux. Intra-individual variability in voiding diaries of children with enuresis. Randomized controlled trials - The what, when, how and why. Commentary to "What matters in testicular torsion? Association of hospital transfer, race and socioeconomic factors with testicular outcomes in a single center experience".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1