Abdullah Al-Ani, Yousuf Al Suleimani, Sabrina Ritscher, Stefan W Toennes, Amna Al-Hashar, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani, Mohammed Al Za'abi, Khamis Al Hashmi
{"title":"阿曼患者坚持服用降压药的情况:药物生化分析与莫里斯基坚持服药量表的比较。","authors":"Abdullah Al-Ani, Yousuf Al Suleimani, Sabrina Ritscher, Stefan W Toennes, Amna Al-Hashar, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani, Mohammed Al Za'abi, Khamis Al Hashmi","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication nonadherence is a major risk factor for suboptimal or failed hypertension pharmacologic therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the nonadherence rate to antihypertensive medications using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a prospective cross-sectional cohort design. Patients with hypertension aged ≥18 years and prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication were recruited from an outpatient hypertensive clinic at a tertiary healthcare institution in Oman. Adherence was assessed using LC-MS/MS urine analysis and the MMAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 patients completed the MMAS questionnaire and provided urine samples for LC-MS/MS analysis. The overall mean age of the cohort was 55 ± 13 years, and 57% of the patients were men. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 146 ± 18 mmHg and 79 ± 10 mmHg, respectively. Using the MMAS method, 65% of the patients reported nonadherence. However, LC-MS/MS analysis revealed that only 27% of the patients were nonadherent. The adherent group by LC-MS/MS had significantly lower systolic (P = 0.026) and diastolic blood pressures (P < 0.001) than the nonadherent group, whereas no differences were observed using the MMAS method. There was weak or no agreement between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS results (P = 0.142).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost one-fourth of our patients with hypertension were nonadherent to their medications. There was a weak concordance between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS methods in detecting medication nonadherence. Further research into noninvasive convenient adherence scales or methods and their correlations with LC-MS/MS analysis is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to antihypertensive medications in Omani patients: a comparison of drug biochemical analysis and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Al-Ani, Yousuf Al Suleimani, Sabrina Ritscher, Stefan W Toennes, Amna Al-Hashar, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani, Mohammed Al Za'abi, Khamis Al Hashmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication nonadherence is a major risk factor for suboptimal or failed hypertension pharmacologic therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the nonadherence rate to antihypertensive medications using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a prospective cross-sectional cohort design. Patients with hypertension aged ≥18 years and prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication were recruited from an outpatient hypertensive clinic at a tertiary healthcare institution in Oman. Adherence was assessed using LC-MS/MS urine analysis and the MMAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 patients completed the MMAS questionnaire and provided urine samples for LC-MS/MS analysis. The overall mean age of the cohort was 55 ± 13 years, and 57% of the patients were men. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 146 ± 18 mmHg and 79 ± 10 mmHg, respectively. Using the MMAS method, 65% of the patients reported nonadherence. However, LC-MS/MS analysis revealed that only 27% of the patients were nonadherent. The adherent group by LC-MS/MS had significantly lower systolic (P = 0.026) and diastolic blood pressures (P < 0.001) than the nonadherent group, whereas no differences were observed using the MMAS method. There was weak or no agreement between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS results (P = 0.142).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost one-fourth of our patients with hypertension were nonadherent to their medications. There was a weak concordance between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS methods in detecting medication nonadherence. Further research into noninvasive convenient adherence scales or methods and their correlations with LC-MS/MS analysis is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003917\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adherence to antihypertensive medications in Omani patients: a comparison of drug biochemical analysis and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale.
Background: Medication nonadherence is a major risk factor for suboptimal or failed hypertension pharmacologic therapy.
Objective: To determine the nonadherence rate to antihypertensive medications using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS).
Methods: This study used a prospective cross-sectional cohort design. Patients with hypertension aged ≥18 years and prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication were recruited from an outpatient hypertensive clinic at a tertiary healthcare institution in Oman. Adherence was assessed using LC-MS/MS urine analysis and the MMAS.
Results: In total, 162 patients completed the MMAS questionnaire and provided urine samples for LC-MS/MS analysis. The overall mean age of the cohort was 55 ± 13 years, and 57% of the patients were men. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 146 ± 18 mmHg and 79 ± 10 mmHg, respectively. Using the MMAS method, 65% of the patients reported nonadherence. However, LC-MS/MS analysis revealed that only 27% of the patients were nonadherent. The adherent group by LC-MS/MS had significantly lower systolic (P = 0.026) and diastolic blood pressures (P < 0.001) than the nonadherent group, whereas no differences were observed using the MMAS method. There was weak or no agreement between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS results (P = 0.142).
Conclusion: Almost one-fourth of our patients with hypertension were nonadherent to their medications. There was a weak concordance between the MMAS and LC-MS/MS methods in detecting medication nonadherence. Further research into noninvasive convenient adherence scales or methods and their correlations with LC-MS/MS analysis is warranted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.