血压变异性与血压表型之间的关系:家庭血压监测研究。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003925
Marco A M Alves, Rodrigo Bezerra, Christian S Dal Pont, Marco A Mota-Gomes, Annelise M G Paiva, Weimar S Barroso, Roberto D Miranda, Eduardo C D Barbosa, Andréa A Brandão, José L Lima-Filho, Antonio Coca, Andrei C Sposito, Audes D M Feitosa, Wilson Nadruz
{"title":"血压变异性与血压表型之间的关系:家庭血压监测研究。","authors":"Marco A M Alves, Rodrigo Bezerra, Christian S Dal Pont, Marco A Mota-Gomes, Annelise M G Paiva, Weimar S Barroso, Roberto D Miranda, Eduardo C D Barbosa, Andréa A Brandão, José L Lima-Filho, Antonio Coca, Andrei C Sposito, Audes D M Feitosa, Wilson Nadruz","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Home blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) and BP phenotypes such as white-coat hypertension (WCH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), masked hypertension (MH) and masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) are predictors of adverse cardiovascular events. This study compared home BPV across BP phenotypes built from abnormal office BP (OBP) and home BP monitoring (HBPM) thresholds defined by three distinct societies [European Society of Hypertension (ESH): OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM ≥ 135/85 mmHg; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA): OBP and HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg and Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC): OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study evaluated 51 194 treated (37% men, age = 61 ± 15 years) and 56 100 untreated (41% men, age = 54 ± 16 years) individuals from 1045 Brazilian centers who underwent OBP and HBPM measurements. Systolic and diastolic home BPV were estimated as the: standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and the variability independent of the mean of HBPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of adjusted analysis showed that home BPV parameters were significantly greater in individuals with WCH/WUCH according to the BSC criteria, in those with MH/MUCH defined by the ACC/AHA criteria, and tended to be greater in individuals with either MH/MUCH or WCH/WUCH defined by the ESH criteria.Furthermore, restricted cubic spline analysis showed a U-shaped association between BPV and the difference between OBP and HBPM in treated and untreated individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home BPV was greater in WCH/WUCH and/or MH/MUCH depending on the criteria used to define abnormal OBP and HBPM thresholds. These findings underscore the need to standardize abnormal BP criteria in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between blood pressure variability and blood pressure phenotypes: a home blood pressure monitoring study.\",\"authors\":\"Marco A M Alves, Rodrigo Bezerra, Christian S Dal Pont, Marco A Mota-Gomes, Annelise M G Paiva, Weimar S Barroso, Roberto D Miranda, Eduardo C D Barbosa, Andréa A Brandão, José L Lima-Filho, Antonio Coca, Andrei C Sposito, Audes D M Feitosa, Wilson Nadruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Home blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) and BP phenotypes such as white-coat hypertension (WCH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), masked hypertension (MH) and masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) are predictors of adverse cardiovascular events. This study compared home BPV across BP phenotypes built from abnormal office BP (OBP) and home BP monitoring (HBPM) thresholds defined by three distinct societies [European Society of Hypertension (ESH): OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM ≥ 135/85 mmHg; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA): OBP and HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg and Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC): OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study evaluated 51 194 treated (37% men, age = 61 ± 15 years) and 56 100 untreated (41% men, age = 54 ± 16 years) individuals from 1045 Brazilian centers who underwent OBP and HBPM measurements. Systolic and diastolic home BPV were estimated as the: standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and the variability independent of the mean of HBPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of adjusted analysis showed that home BPV parameters were significantly greater in individuals with WCH/WUCH according to the BSC criteria, in those with MH/MUCH defined by the ACC/AHA criteria, and tended to be greater in individuals with either MH/MUCH or WCH/WUCH defined by the ESH criteria.Furthermore, restricted cubic spline analysis showed a U-shaped association between BPV and the difference between OBP and HBPM in treated and untreated individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home BPV was greater in WCH/WUCH and/or MH/MUCH depending on the criteria used to define abnormal OBP and HBPM thresholds. These findings underscore the need to standardize abnormal BP criteria in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003925\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:家庭血压(BP)变异性(BPV)和白大衣高血压(WCH)、白大衣失控高血压(WUCH)、掩饰性高血压(MH)和掩饰性失控高血压(MUCH)等血压表型是不良心血管事件的预测因素。本研究比较了由三个不同学会(欧洲高血压学会(ESH)、OBP ≥ 140/90 和 MUCH)定义的异常诊室血压(OBP)和家庭血压监测(HBPM)阈值所建立的不同血压表型的家庭血压值:欧洲高血压学会 (ESH):OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg 和 HBPM ≥ 135/85 mmHg;美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会 (ACC/AHA):OBP 和 HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg;巴西心脏病学会 (BSC):方法:这项横断面研究评估了来自巴西 1045 个中心的 51 194 名接受治疗者(37% 为男性,年龄 = 61 ± 15 岁)和 56 100 名未接受治疗者(41% 为男性,年龄 = 54 ± 16 岁),他们都接受了 OBP 和 HBPM 测量。收缩压和舒张压家庭血压变异值的估算方法为:标准偏差、变异系数和独立于 HBPM 平均值的变异性:调整后的分析结果显示,根据 BSC 标准,WCH/WUCH 患者的家庭 BPV 参数明显高于根据 ACC/AHA 标准定义的 MH/MUCH 患者,而根据 ESH 标准定义的 MH/MUCH 或 WCH/WUCH 患者的家庭 BPV 参数往往高于根据 ACC/AHA 标准定义的 MH/MUCH 患者:结论:WCH/WUCH 和/或 MH/MUCH 患者的居家 BPV 较高,这取决于用于定义异常 OBP 和 HBPM 临界值的标准。这些发现强调了在临床实践中统一血压异常标准的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between blood pressure variability and blood pressure phenotypes: a home blood pressure monitoring study.

Objective: Home blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) and BP phenotypes such as white-coat hypertension (WCH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), masked hypertension (MH) and masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) are predictors of adverse cardiovascular events. This study compared home BPV across BP phenotypes built from abnormal office BP (OBP) and home BP monitoring (HBPM) thresholds defined by three distinct societies [European Society of Hypertension (ESH): OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM ≥ 135/85 mmHg; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA): OBP and HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg and Brazilian Society of Cardiology (BSC): OBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and HBPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg].

Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 51 194 treated (37% men, age = 61 ± 15 years) and 56 100 untreated (41% men, age = 54 ± 16 years) individuals from 1045 Brazilian centers who underwent OBP and HBPM measurements. Systolic and diastolic home BPV were estimated as the: standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and the variability independent of the mean of HBPM.

Results: Results of adjusted analysis showed that home BPV parameters were significantly greater in individuals with WCH/WUCH according to the BSC criteria, in those with MH/MUCH defined by the ACC/AHA criteria, and tended to be greater in individuals with either MH/MUCH or WCH/WUCH defined by the ESH criteria.Furthermore, restricted cubic spline analysis showed a U-shaped association between BPV and the difference between OBP and HBPM in treated and untreated individuals.

Conclusion: Home BPV was greater in WCH/WUCH and/or MH/MUCH depending on the criteria used to define abnormal OBP and HBPM thresholds. These findings underscore the need to standardize abnormal BP criteria in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Response to commentary by Andrew Sharp et al. Targeting the sympathetic nervous system with the selective imidazoline receptor agonist moxonidine for the management of hypertension: an international position statement. Abnormal brain-heart electrophysiology in mild and severe orthostatic hypotension. Mechanisms of thiazide-induced hypertension treatment: insights from gene expression and histological analysis in malignant stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Aortic reservoir-excess pressure parameters are associated with worse cognitive function in people with untreated stage II/III hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1