口服塞马鲁肽与注射塞马鲁肽在降低 2 型糖尿病患者血红蛋白 A1C 和体重方面的真实世界比较。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1177/87551225241289959
Maria Pinto, Lillian Brennan, Katie Diehl, Shally Lin, Samantha Heacock
{"title":"口服塞马鲁肽与注射塞马鲁肽在降低 2 型糖尿病患者血红蛋白 A1C 和体重方面的真实世界比较。","authors":"Maria Pinto, Lillian Brennan, Katie Diehl, Shally Lin, Samantha Heacock","doi":"10.1177/87551225241289959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No head-to-head comparisons of semaglutide formulations currently exist in the literature. In practice, many may think that oral and injectable semaglutide formulations are interchangeable, although there is currently limited real-world data to determine whether this is accurate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of oral versus injectable semaglutide on hemoglobin A<sub>1C</sub> (HbA<sub>1C</sub>) and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center review of adult patients who had a diagnosis of T2D and were treated with oral or injectable semaglutide between November 1, 2019, and July 31, 2022. Primary outcome was a comparison of changes in HbA<sub>1C</sub> (%) and weight (kg) from baseline to 6 months between patients receiving oral versus injectable semaglutide, stratified according to highest dose received. Secondary outcomes included frequency of dose reductions and discontinuations, achievement of clinical goals, and presence of an embedded clinical pharmacist at patients' primary care office.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 patients were included. Patients experienced mean decreases in HbA<sub>1C</sub> and weight from baseline to 6 months of -1.75% (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and -3.64 kg (<i>P</i> = 0.015), respectively, in the oral semaglutide group and -1.35% (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and -5.26 kg (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively, in the injectable semaglutide group. When directly comparing semaglutide formulations, oral semaglutide demonstrated a 0.4% greater numerical reduction in HbA<sub>1C</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.523) and injectable semaglutide demonstrated a 1.62-kg greater numerical reduction in weight (<i>P</i> = 0.312). Adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently with oral semaglutide than with injectable semaglutide (16.7% vs 4.9%). Discontinuation due to AEs was more common with oral semaglutide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, patients with T2D who received oral semaglutide demonstrated greater reductions in HbA<sub>1C</sub>, whereas those treated with injectable semaglutide had greater reductions in weight, although there were no statistically significant reductions in HbA<sub>1C</sub> or weight between the 2 formulations. Rates of AEs and discontinuation were more common in the oral semaglutide group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225241289959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Comparison of Oral Versus Injectable Semaglutide for the Reduction of Hemoglobin A<sub>1C</sub> and Weight in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Pinto, Lillian Brennan, Katie Diehl, Shally Lin, Samantha Heacock\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225241289959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No head-to-head comparisons of semaglutide formulations currently exist in the literature. In practice, many may think that oral and injectable semaglutide formulations are interchangeable, although there is currently limited real-world data to determine whether this is accurate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of oral versus injectable semaglutide on hemoglobin A<sub>1C</sub> (HbA<sub>1C</sub>) and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center review of adult patients who had a diagnosis of T2D and were treated with oral or injectable semaglutide between November 1, 2019, and July 31, 2022. Primary outcome was a comparison of changes in HbA<sub>1C</sub> (%) and weight (kg) from baseline to 6 months between patients receiving oral versus injectable semaglutide, stratified according to highest dose received. Secondary outcomes included frequency of dose reductions and discontinuations, achievement of clinical goals, and presence of an embedded clinical pharmacist at patients' primary care office.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 patients were included. Patients experienced mean decreases in HbA<sub>1C</sub> and weight from baseline to 6 months of -1.75% (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and -3.64 kg (<i>P</i> = 0.015), respectively, in the oral semaglutide group and -1.35% (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and -5.26 kg (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively, in the injectable semaglutide group. When directly comparing semaglutide formulations, oral semaglutide demonstrated a 0.4% greater numerical reduction in HbA<sub>1C</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.523) and injectable semaglutide demonstrated a 1.62-kg greater numerical reduction in weight (<i>P</i> = 0.312). Adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently with oral semaglutide than with injectable semaglutide (16.7% vs 4.9%). Discontinuation due to AEs was more common with oral semaglutide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, patients with T2D who received oral semaglutide demonstrated greater reductions in HbA<sub>1C</sub>, whereas those treated with injectable semaglutide had greater reductions in weight, although there were no statistically significant reductions in HbA<sub>1C</sub> or weight between the 2 formulations. Rates of AEs and discontinuation were more common in the oral semaglutide group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87551225241289959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559783/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225241289959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225241289959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前尚无文献对塞马鲁肽制剂进行头对头比较。在实践中,许多人可能会认为口服和注射的塞马鲁肽制剂是可以互换的,尽管目前只有有限的实际数据来确定这种说法是否准确:本研究旨在确定口服与注射塞马鲁肽对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者血红蛋白 A1C(HbA1C)和体重的影响:这是对2019年11月1日至2022年7月31日期间确诊为T2D并接受口服或注射塞马鲁肽治疗的成年患者进行的回顾性单中心研究。主要结果是比较接受口服与注射塞马鲁肽治疗的患者从基线到6个月的HbA1C(%)和体重(kg)变化,根据接受的最高剂量进行分层。次要结果包括减量和停药频率、临床目标的实现情况以及在患者的初级保健诊所派驻临床药师的情况:结果:共纳入 105 名患者。从基线到6个月期间,口服塞马鲁肽组患者的HbA1C和体重平均降幅分别为-1.75%(P < 0.001)和-3.64 kg(P = 0.015),注射塞马鲁肽组患者的HbA1C和体重平均降幅分别为-1.35%(P < 0.001)和-5.26 kg(P < 0.001)。如果直接比较两种塞马鲁肽配方,口服塞马鲁肽的HbA1C数值降低幅度比注射塞马鲁肽大0.4%(P = 0.523),体重数值降低幅度比注射塞马鲁肽大1.62公斤(P = 0.312)。口服塞马鲁肽发生不良事件(AE)的频率高于注射塞马鲁肽(16.7% vs 4.9%)。因不良反应而停药的情况在口服塞马鲁肽中更为常见:在这项研究中,接受口服塞马鲁肽治疗的T2D患者的HbA1C降低幅度更大,而接受注射塞马鲁肽治疗的患者的体重降低幅度更大,尽管两种制剂之间的HbA1C或体重降低幅度没有统计学意义。口服塞马鲁肽组的不良反应率和停药率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-World Comparison of Oral Versus Injectable Semaglutide for the Reduction of Hemoglobin A1C and Weight in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Background: No head-to-head comparisons of semaglutide formulations currently exist in the literature. In practice, many may think that oral and injectable semaglutide formulations are interchangeable, although there is currently limited real-world data to determine whether this is accurate.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of oral versus injectable semaglutide on hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center review of adult patients who had a diagnosis of T2D and were treated with oral or injectable semaglutide between November 1, 2019, and July 31, 2022. Primary outcome was a comparison of changes in HbA1C (%) and weight (kg) from baseline to 6 months between patients receiving oral versus injectable semaglutide, stratified according to highest dose received. Secondary outcomes included frequency of dose reductions and discontinuations, achievement of clinical goals, and presence of an embedded clinical pharmacist at patients' primary care office.

Results: A total of 105 patients were included. Patients experienced mean decreases in HbA1C and weight from baseline to 6 months of -1.75% (P < 0.001) and -3.64 kg (P = 0.015), respectively, in the oral semaglutide group and -1.35% (P < 0.001) and -5.26 kg (P < 0.001), respectively, in the injectable semaglutide group. When directly comparing semaglutide formulations, oral semaglutide demonstrated a 0.4% greater numerical reduction in HbA1C (P = 0.523) and injectable semaglutide demonstrated a 1.62-kg greater numerical reduction in weight (P = 0.312). Adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently with oral semaglutide than with injectable semaglutide (16.7% vs 4.9%). Discontinuation due to AEs was more common with oral semaglutide.

Conclusion: In this study, patients with T2D who received oral semaglutide demonstrated greater reductions in HbA1C, whereas those treated with injectable semaglutide had greater reductions in weight, although there were no statistically significant reductions in HbA1C or weight between the 2 formulations. Rates of AEs and discontinuation were more common in the oral semaglutide group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Persistence After Switching From Adalimumab Biosimilar MSB11022 to Adalimumab Biosimilar GP2017 in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. State Variation in Uptake of Pharmacy-Based CLIA-Waived Testing: Impact of Laws and Regulations. Risk of Tendon Injury in Patients Treated With Fluoroquinolone (FQ) Vs Non-Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Impact of Nonmedical Switches From Reference Infliximab to Biosimilars on Disease Control Within a Rheumatology Practice. Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Continuation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Late-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1