双重奥曲肽受体拮抗剂对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1111/jsr.14399
Wei-Chih Yeh, Ying-Sheng Li, Yang-Pei Chang, Chung-Yao Hsu
{"title":"双重奥曲肽受体拮抗剂对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wei-Chih Yeh, Ying-Sheng Li, Yang-Pei Chang, Chung-Yao Hsu","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are indicated for the treatment of insomnia disorder. However, DORAs may change sleep parameters, thus having adverse effects on patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This meta-analysis clarified the impact of DORAs in OSA treatment on sleep architecture and respiratory parameters. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases for randomised control trials published up to May 2024. The search focussed on studies discussing the effects of DORAs on sleep architecture in patients with OSA. Nonrandomised studies were excluded. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. The patients were categorised into subgroups based on the treatment protocol (single or multiple dosages). The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials assessed the risk of bias. Our meta-analysis included four randomised placebo-controlled trials, encompassing 126 patients with a mean age of 49.1 years. The effects of DORAs on sleep architecture and respiratory parameters were examined. The main findings were as follows: DORAs significantly increased the total sleep time and improved sleep efficiency. However, they did not affect rapid eye movement sleep. DORAs also showed a trend towards decreased wake after sleep onset and did not increase the apnea-hypopnea index. DORAs did not increase the percentage of total sleep time with oxygen saturation lower than 90% and 85% compared with placebo, respectively. Furthermore, DORAs were not associated with significantly higher adverse effects compared with placebo. This meta-analysis demonstrated that DORAs improve sleep and do not impair nighttime respiratory function in patients with OSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Chih Yeh, Ying-Sheng Li, Yang-Pei Chang, Chung-Yao Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.14399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are indicated for the treatment of insomnia disorder. However, DORAs may change sleep parameters, thus having adverse effects on patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This meta-analysis clarified the impact of DORAs in OSA treatment on sleep architecture and respiratory parameters. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases for randomised control trials published up to May 2024. The search focussed on studies discussing the effects of DORAs on sleep architecture in patients with OSA. Nonrandomised studies were excluded. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. The patients were categorised into subgroups based on the treatment protocol (single or multiple dosages). The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials assessed the risk of bias. Our meta-analysis included four randomised placebo-controlled trials, encompassing 126 patients with a mean age of 49.1 years. The effects of DORAs on sleep architecture and respiratory parameters were examined. The main findings were as follows: DORAs significantly increased the total sleep time and improved sleep efficiency. However, they did not affect rapid eye movement sleep. DORAs also showed a trend towards decreased wake after sleep onset and did not increase the apnea-hypopnea index. DORAs did not increase the percentage of total sleep time with oxygen saturation lower than 90% and 85% compared with placebo, respectively. Furthermore, DORAs were not associated with significantly higher adverse effects compared with placebo. This meta-analysis demonstrated that DORAs improve sleep and do not impair nighttime respiratory function in patients with OSA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14399\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双奥曲肽受体拮抗剂(DORAs)适用于治疗失眠症。然而,DORAs 可能会改变睡眠参数,从而对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者产生不利影响。本荟萃分析阐明了治疗 OSA 的 DORAs 对睡眠结构和呼吸参数的影响。我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 数据库中截至 2024 年 5 月发表的随机对照试验。搜索的重点是讨论 DORAs 对 OSA 患者睡眠结构影响的研究。非随机研究被排除在外。采用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。根据治疗方案(单剂量或多剂量)将患者分为不同的亚组。科克伦随机试验偏倚风险工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。我们的荟萃分析包括四项随机安慰剂对照试验,共涉及 126 名患者,平均年龄为 49.1 岁。我们研究了 DORAs 对睡眠结构和呼吸参数的影响。主要研究结果如下DORAs 明显增加了总睡眠时间,提高了睡眠效率。然而,它们并不影响快速眼动睡眠。DORAs 还显示出睡眠开始后唤醒次数减少的趋势,并且不会增加呼吸暂停-低通气指数。与安慰剂相比,DORAs 没有增加血氧饱和度低于 90% 和 85% 的总睡眠时间百分比。此外,与安慰剂相比,DORAs 的不良反应并没有明显增加。这项荟萃分析表明,DORAs 可改善 OSA 患者的睡眠,并且不会损害夜间呼吸功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are indicated for the treatment of insomnia disorder. However, DORAs may change sleep parameters, thus having adverse effects on patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This meta-analysis clarified the impact of DORAs in OSA treatment on sleep architecture and respiratory parameters. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases for randomised control trials published up to May 2024. The search focussed on studies discussing the effects of DORAs on sleep architecture in patients with OSA. Nonrandomised studies were excluded. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. The patients were categorised into subgroups based on the treatment protocol (single or multiple dosages). The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials assessed the risk of bias. Our meta-analysis included four randomised placebo-controlled trials, encompassing 126 patients with a mean age of 49.1 years. The effects of DORAs on sleep architecture and respiratory parameters were examined. The main findings were as follows: DORAs significantly increased the total sleep time and improved sleep efficiency. However, they did not affect rapid eye movement sleep. DORAs also showed a trend towards decreased wake after sleep onset and did not increase the apnea-hypopnea index. DORAs did not increase the percentage of total sleep time with oxygen saturation lower than 90% and 85% compared with placebo, respectively. Furthermore, DORAs were not associated with significantly higher adverse effects compared with placebo. This meta-analysis demonstrated that DORAs improve sleep and do not impair nighttime respiratory function in patients with OSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
期刊最新文献
Poor sleep quality is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection: A prospective cohort study. Pilot analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based contributors to patient-centred optimization of mandibular advancement devices in obstructive sleep apnea. Differential effects of sleep position and sleep stage on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Sex-specific changes in sleep quality with aging: Insights from wearable device analysis. The efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1