利用超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱结合多元统计分析技术筛选、鉴定和比较Tripterygium Hypoglaucum Hutch制剂的化学成分。

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of separation science Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1002/jssc.70023
Hui-Zhi Luo, Jie Xiang, Wan-Yu Gui, Jia-Hui Gong, Jian-Dong Zou, Chang-Yin Li
{"title":"利用超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱结合多元统计分析技术筛选、鉴定和比较Tripterygium Hypoglaucum Hutch制剂的化学成分。","authors":"Hui-Zhi Luo,&nbsp;Jie Xiang,&nbsp;Wan-Yu Gui,&nbsp;Jia-Hui Gong,&nbsp;Jian-Dong Zou,&nbsp;Chang-Yin Li","doi":"10.1002/jssc.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>Colquhounia</i> root tablets (CRT) and <i>Tripterygium hypoglaucum hutch</i> tablets (THHT), two major <i>Tripterygium hypoglaucum hutch</i> (THH) commercial preparations, have been used to treat chronic kidney diseases or rheumatic diseases. However, there have been no reports on the chemical comparison between CRT and THHT, greatly hindering the understanding of their pharmacological difference as well as their rational application in clinical practice. In the present study, ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry combined with automated data analysis by MS-DIAL software and MS-FLO website was employed to systematically screen and characterize the components in CRT and THHT. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to compare the differences between these two preparations. As a result, up to 92 components were tentatively identified, and 17 of them were characterized for the first time in THH preparations. According to the criteria of variable importance in projection (VIP) &gt;1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, and fold change (FC) &gt; 1.2, 46 components could be screened as major differential chemical components. Among them, phenolic acids, organic acids, amino acids, and diterpenoids were higher in CRT, while the sesquiterpene alkaloids were relatively higher in THHT. This study clarified the chemical material basis and the difference between CRT and THHT, providing a valuable reference for quality control and clinical rational use of THH preparations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"47 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical Screening, Identification, and Comparison of Tripterygium Hypoglaucum Hutch Preparations by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Combined With Multivariate Statistical Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hui-Zhi Luo,&nbsp;Jie Xiang,&nbsp;Wan-Yu Gui,&nbsp;Jia-Hui Gong,&nbsp;Jian-Dong Zou,&nbsp;Chang-Yin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jssc.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p><i>Colquhounia</i> root tablets (CRT) and <i>Tripterygium hypoglaucum hutch</i> tablets (THHT), two major <i>Tripterygium hypoglaucum hutch</i> (THH) commercial preparations, have been used to treat chronic kidney diseases or rheumatic diseases. However, there have been no reports on the chemical comparison between CRT and THHT, greatly hindering the understanding of their pharmacological difference as well as their rational application in clinical practice. In the present study, ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry combined with automated data analysis by MS-DIAL software and MS-FLO website was employed to systematically screen and characterize the components in CRT and THHT. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to compare the differences between these two preparations. As a result, up to 92 components were tentatively identified, and 17 of them were characterized for the first time in THH preparations. According to the criteria of variable importance in projection (VIP) &gt;1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, and fold change (FC) &gt; 1.2, 46 components could be screened as major differential chemical components. Among them, phenolic acids, organic acids, amino acids, and diterpenoids were higher in CRT, while the sesquiterpene alkaloids were relatively higher in THHT. This study clarified the chemical material basis and the difference between CRT and THHT, providing a valuable reference for quality control and clinical rational use of THH preparations.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of separation science\",\"volume\":\"47 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of separation science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高良姜根片(Colquhounia root tablets,CRT)和三叶青(Tripterygium hypoglaucum hutch)片(Tripterygium hypoglaucum hutch tablets,THT)是三叶青(THH)的两种主要商品制剂,一直被用于治疗慢性肾病或风湿病。然而,目前还没有关于 CRT 和 THHT 化学性质比较的报道,这极大地阻碍了人们对其药理差异的了解以及在临床上的合理应用。本研究采用超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间串联质谱法,结合MS-DIAL软件和MS-FLO网站的自动数据分析,对CRT和THT中的成分进行了系统的筛选和表征。采用多元统计分析比较了这两种制剂之间的差异。结果,初步确定了多达 92 种成分,其中 17 种成分是首次在 THH 制剂中定性。根据预测中可变重要性(VIP)>1、P < 0.05 和折叠变化(FC)> 1.2 的标准,可筛选出 46 种成分作为主要的差异化学成分。其中,酚酸、有机酸、氨基酸和二萜类化合物在 CRT 中含量较高,而倍半萜生物碱在 THHT 中含量相对较高。本研究阐明了CRT与THT的化学物质基础和差异,为THH制剂的质量控制和临床合理使用提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chemical Screening, Identification, and Comparison of Tripterygium Hypoglaucum Hutch Preparations by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Combined With Multivariate Statistical Analysis

Colquhounia root tablets (CRT) and Tripterygium hypoglaucum hutch tablets (THHT), two major Tripterygium hypoglaucum hutch (THH) commercial preparations, have been used to treat chronic kidney diseases or rheumatic diseases. However, there have been no reports on the chemical comparison between CRT and THHT, greatly hindering the understanding of their pharmacological difference as well as their rational application in clinical practice. In the present study, ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry combined with automated data analysis by MS-DIAL software and MS-FLO website was employed to systematically screen and characterize the components in CRT and THHT. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to compare the differences between these two preparations. As a result, up to 92 components were tentatively identified, and 17 of them were characterized for the first time in THH preparations. According to the criteria of variable importance in projection (VIP) >1, p < 0.05, and fold change (FC) > 1.2, 46 components could be screened as major differential chemical components. Among them, phenolic acids, organic acids, amino acids, and diterpenoids were higher in CRT, while the sesquiterpene alkaloids were relatively higher in THHT. This study clarified the chemical material basis and the difference between CRT and THHT, providing a valuable reference for quality control and clinical rational use of THH preparations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of separation science
Journal of separation science 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
408
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.
期刊最新文献
Primaquine Analysis in Pharmaceutical Formulation Using Multiple and Short-End Injections by Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Ultraviolet Detection Issue Information Quality Assessment of Corydalis saxicola Bunting Using Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Components by Single Marker and Fingerprint Analysis Chemical Screening, Identification, and Comparison of Tripterygium Hypoglaucum Hutch Preparations by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Combined With Multivariate Statistical Analysis Extraction of Penicillin G From Dairy Products Using Deep Eutectic Solvent/Alginate Beads Enhanced via Layered Double Hydroxides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1