{"title":"用于检测鸟类曲霉菌感染的尸检诊断测试:系统综述。","authors":"Sabrina Vieu, Jacques Guillot, François Beaudeau","doi":"10.1093/mmy/myae112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aspergillosis remains a common and life-threatening disease in captive and wild birds all over the world. Diagnosis is currently based on clinical signs or lesions, diagnostic imaging and a variety of biological tests. This systematic review aimed to compare the accuracy of antemortem diagnostic tests for Aspergillus infection in birds. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CAB until January 2024. The methodological quality was assessed with QUADAS 2 risk of bias tool. The thirteen studies, selected for the review, included results from a wide variety of birds (mainly Spheniciformes but also Falconiformes, Psittaciformes, and Galliformes) from wildlife rehabilitation centers, zoological parks or veterinary practices. Aspergillus infection was mainly confirmed by fungal culture and/or histopathology. Serum markers included Aspergillus components (galactomannan, ß-D-glucan, mannoproteins and gliotoxin), anti-Aspergillus antibodies, 3-hydroxybutyrate as well as protein electrophoresis and acute phase molecules. Sensitivity and specificity displayed a large amount of variation despite threshold arrangement. Disparities in the number of individuals per study did not allow for reliable comparison. Platelia Ag Assay (Bio-Rad), the most commonly used test in the studies, demonstrated moderate specificity and low sensitivity. Overall, non-specific tests demonstrated more consistent performance, whereas specific tests showed greater variability. Based on current knowledge, none of these tests provide sufficient accuracy to reliably detect Aspergillus infection in birds in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18586,"journal":{"name":"Medical mycology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antemortem diagnostic tests for the detection of Aspergillus infection in birds: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Vieu, Jacques Guillot, François Beaudeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mmy/myae112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aspergillosis remains a common and life-threatening disease in captive and wild birds all over the world. Diagnosis is currently based on clinical signs or lesions, diagnostic imaging and a variety of biological tests. This systematic review aimed to compare the accuracy of antemortem diagnostic tests for Aspergillus infection in birds. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CAB until January 2024. The methodological quality was assessed with QUADAS 2 risk of bias tool. The thirteen studies, selected for the review, included results from a wide variety of birds (mainly Spheniciformes but also Falconiformes, Psittaciformes, and Galliformes) from wildlife rehabilitation centers, zoological parks or veterinary practices. Aspergillus infection was mainly confirmed by fungal culture and/or histopathology. Serum markers included Aspergillus components (galactomannan, ß-D-glucan, mannoproteins and gliotoxin), anti-Aspergillus antibodies, 3-hydroxybutyrate as well as protein electrophoresis and acute phase molecules. Sensitivity and specificity displayed a large amount of variation despite threshold arrangement. Disparities in the number of individuals per study did not allow for reliable comparison. Platelia Ag Assay (Bio-Rad), the most commonly used test in the studies, demonstrated moderate specificity and low sensitivity. Overall, non-specific tests demonstrated more consistent performance, whereas specific tests showed greater variability. Based on current knowledge, none of these tests provide sufficient accuracy to reliably detect Aspergillus infection in birds in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical mycology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical mycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myae112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical mycology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myae112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
曲霉菌病仍然是世界各地人工饲养鸟类和野生鸟类的一种常见病,也是一种威胁生命的疾病。目前的诊断依据是临床症状或病变、影像诊断和各种生物检测。本系统综述旨在比较鸟类曲霉菌感染死前诊断检测的准确性。根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,我们在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和CAB上进行了检索,直至2024年1月。方法学质量采用 QUADAS 2 偏倚风险工具进行评估。被选中进行综述的 13 项研究包括来自野生动物康复中心、动物园或兽医诊所的各种鸟类(主要是雀形目,也包括隼形目、鹦形目和瘿形目)的结果。曲霉菌感染主要通过真菌培养和/或组织病理学证实。血清标记物包括曲霉菌成分(半乳甘露聚糖、ß-D-葡聚糖、甘露蛋白和胶毒素)、抗曲霉菌抗体、3-羟丁酸以及蛋白质电泳和急性期分子。尽管对阈值进行了排列,但灵敏度和特异性仍存在很大差异。由于每项研究的个体数量不同,因此无法进行可靠的比较。研究中最常用的检测方法 Platelia Ag Assay(Bio-Rad)显示出中等程度的特异性和较低的灵敏度。总体而言,非特异性检测的性能更稳定,而特异性检测的变异性更大。根据目前的知识,这些检测方法的准确性都不足以在临床实践中可靠地检测鸟类是否感染曲霉菌。
Antemortem diagnostic tests for the detection of Aspergillus infection in birds: a systematic review.
Aspergillosis remains a common and life-threatening disease in captive and wild birds all over the world. Diagnosis is currently based on clinical signs or lesions, diagnostic imaging and a variety of biological tests. This systematic review aimed to compare the accuracy of antemortem diagnostic tests for Aspergillus infection in birds. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CAB until January 2024. The methodological quality was assessed with QUADAS 2 risk of bias tool. The thirteen studies, selected for the review, included results from a wide variety of birds (mainly Spheniciformes but also Falconiformes, Psittaciformes, and Galliformes) from wildlife rehabilitation centers, zoological parks or veterinary practices. Aspergillus infection was mainly confirmed by fungal culture and/or histopathology. Serum markers included Aspergillus components (galactomannan, ß-D-glucan, mannoproteins and gliotoxin), anti-Aspergillus antibodies, 3-hydroxybutyrate as well as protein electrophoresis and acute phase molecules. Sensitivity and specificity displayed a large amount of variation despite threshold arrangement. Disparities in the number of individuals per study did not allow for reliable comparison. Platelia Ag Assay (Bio-Rad), the most commonly used test in the studies, demonstrated moderate specificity and low sensitivity. Overall, non-specific tests demonstrated more consistent performance, whereas specific tests showed greater variability. Based on current knowledge, none of these tests provide sufficient accuracy to reliably detect Aspergillus infection in birds in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Medical Mycology is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on original and innovative basic and applied studies, as well as learned reviews on all aspects of medical, veterinary and environmental mycology as related to disease. The objective is to present the highest quality scientific reports from throughout the world on divergent topics. These topics include the phylogeny of fungal pathogens, epidemiology and public health mycology themes, new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of mycoses including clinical trials and guidelines, pharmacology and antifungal susceptibilities, changes in taxonomy, description of new or unusual fungi associated with human or animal disease, immunology of fungal infections, vaccinology for prevention of fungal infections, pathogenesis and virulence, and the molecular biology of pathogenic fungi in vitro and in vivo, including genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics. Case reports are no longer accepted. In addition, studies of natural products showing inhibitory activity against pathogenic fungi are not accepted without chemical characterization and identification of the compounds responsible for the inhibitory activity.